• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the fundamental ideas of resurrection and immortality of the soul. (18)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked (a) (i) Explain the fundamental ideas of resurrection and Immorality of the soul. (18) One fundamental idea is the relationship between the mind and body and the criteria of self which affects the immorality of the soul and resurrection theory. Other fundamental ideas for resurrection include how we receive this new body and Hick?s Replica theory which provides the framework to show why resurrection is logically possible. Immorality of the soul is defined as the idea that the soul lives on after death of the body, whereas resurrection is the belief that after death, the body will rise again in bodily form or in a spiritual body that resembles the former individual. The mind and body problem is the debate of whether the mind and body are the same thing or can they be separated. The criteria for self effects fundamental ideas of the afterlife. Descartes for instance believes in dualism, the concept that the body and soul are two distinctive substances. He asserts the idea that the res cogitans is thinking and unextended whereas the res extensa is unthinking and extended; therefore as he states in Mediation 6 ?my mind (?) is entirely and truly distinct from my body and may exist without it.? This is because since the body is extended and unthinking it is divisible as if you were to remove parts of it such as an arm or destroy it, the res cogitans would remain unaffected, whereas the mind cannot be divided because it?s non-physical. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore this supports John Smith?s replica theory that fundamental ideas of resurrection include the resurrected person sharing their old characteristics and are physical beings, it also goes on to suggest that the resurrected person has physical and non-physical characteristics as Jesus was able to transport inside a house where all the entrances where closed but this could just be because Jesus is a special case and has not yet ascended to heaven so this may differ from what will happen to us in the afterlife; despite this it still remains a fundamental idea of resurrection. (ii) Discuss the view that arguments or evidence for belief in life after death are stronger than those against it. (12) Arguments and evidence for belief in life after death is not stronger than those against it as arguments as resurrection theories are merely hypothetical as is evidence for the immorality of the soul. However, this doesn?t make evidence and arguments against the belief in life after death any stronger as they only highlight how arguments for are weak, they do not disprove them. Therefore both arguments and evidence for and against belief in the afterlife are equally weak. Firstly, Hick?s Replica theory of resurrection may be viewed as a convincing argument for life after death as it sets out the framework for resurrection showing how it is logically conceivable for someone to appear in another word as a replica, thereby solving issues of resurrection such as how do those who have been cremated or died as a baby resurrect in their original body as it supports Richard Carrier?s argument that when we die God provides us with a new spiritual body. ...read more.

Conclusion

However Hick also argues that this just shows an ability of telepathy and indicates that there is life after death; it does not prove that there is actually life after death. Derren Brown would go further and argue that mediums are fakes, who use techniques such a cold reading to make complete strangers believe that you know a lot about them without any prior knowledge and therefore doesn?t? prove life beyond death at all for instance the technique of shot gunning where they state very general statements and then wait for the response of the ?subject? for instance: ?I sense a woman in your family with some sort of cancer.? Overall this shows how parapsychology is weak evidence in proving life after death; it simply indicates that it?s a possibility and cannot be proved or disproved. Therefore evidence for and evidence against life after death are both equally weak. Overall, arguments and evidence for belief in life after death is not stronger than those against it. Firstly, Hick?s Replica theory argument is merely a theory and doesn?t prove anything; it is simply hypothetical, as is evidence such as Jesus? resurrection or mediums as neither can be verified. However, this doesn?t make evidence and arguments against the belief in life after death any stronger as they only highlight how the arguments for life after death are weak, they do not disprove them. Therefore both arguments and evidence for and against belief in the afterlife are equally unsuccessful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Theories of the resurrection of the body are logically coherent.

    4 star(s)

    Obviously, we do not know how far this replica, or clone, would succeed in replicating the deceased person's behaviour and mental activity. Or whether memories could be the same, or whether he would be able to 'feel' that he has personal identity the same way as the deceased person.

  2. Compare and contrast the immortality of the soul and the resurrection of the body. ...

    In his dialogue Phaedo, he sets out a literary dialogue between Socrates and Plato and they are discussing the ideas of death and the immortality of the soul. Socrates gives a number of arguments in favour of the immortality of the soul, "the soul is that which renders the body living".

  1. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    without something there would be nothing else!). Plato's belief of the body and soul are similar to his ideas about duality. He believed that the human body was made up of different components: the physical body, the mind and the immortal soul.

  2. Discuss critically the use of symbol as a means of expressing ideas about God

    These are used in completely unrelated ways and if the language about God was used like this then there would be no connection between the language we use in the world and the language used about God and then the language about God would be meaningless.

  1. Body soul destinction

    Identity theory is against behaviourism and suggests that the mind and the brain are in the same place. In the brain, consciousness is generated as well as the other physical processes we link with the brain such as movement. Evidence for this is put foreward in "the philosophy files".

  2. Examine the concepts of immortality of the soul with resurrection of the body - ...

    the same way a soul must escape the physical body when it dies. The body is made up of physical matter and thus will eventually decay, the soul is a non-contingent entity which has an affinity to a higher place Plato describes as the ?realm of forms?.

  1. Examine the key concepts associated with two of the following: Immortality of the ...

    Consequently, rebirth finds itself in opposition not only to Christian teaching, but also to the teaching of Hinduism. The belief in the resurrection originates from the accounts of Jesus? followers and disciples concerning his resurrection as recorded in the Four Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles and the writings of St Paul.

  2. Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body:

    and indeed says ?science has either killed the soul or is in the process of doing so?. However, he does accept the definition of the soul in the Oxford Dictionary, which goes as follows: ?an intellectual power that alludes to the high development of mental faculties, deep feeling and sensitivity

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work