• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the Irenaean Theodicy

Extracts from this document...


1. Explain the Irenaean Theodicy The problem of evil is a challenge to the existence of God due to his qualities of omnipotence, omnibenevolence and omniscience. It maintains that according to theists, God possesses all of these qualities, and indeed has to in order to exist, but that these qualities are inconsistent with the existence of evil and suffering in the world. Macke labelled the Problem of Evil a ?logical problem? that faces all theists, and that they must be able to ?solve? the problem in order to justify their beliefs. A theodicy is an attempt to do just that. The Irenaean Theodicy was set out by Irenaeus and does not attempt to deny the existence of evil, which is a criticism of the Augustinian Theodicy, and accepts that God created a world of both good and bad elements on purpose. ...read more.


He says that it is not moral for people to be forced into belief, and an imperfect world allows there to be doubt about God?s existence, and therefore allows for people to choose whether to believe in God or not. However, this only explains the existence of moral evil in the world. Irenaeus continued to justify natural evil in what is sometimes known as the ?soul-making? argument. He believed that although we are made in God?s image, we have to become in his likeness and natural evil help us to become stronger, better people. It helps people to develop attributes like generosity through giving to charity and to appreciate their lives. This is similar to the Story of Job, where God made lots of awful things happen to Job like murdering his family in order to help him appreciate the privileged life he previously lived and to test his faith in God. ...read more.


Irenaeus interpreted the Bible literally, meaning that he believed that mankind was cursed with an imperfect world as the result of Adam and Eve?s actions. Irenaeus believed that they had to be punished and that although punishment may seem cruel at the time, similarly to punishing a child it will eventually be rewarded because boundaries need to be set. He also saw that Jesus? incarnation was evidence of God?s love, as it gave humans the chance to be saved and to reunite with God. Also an important part of this idea is the afterlife, as that seems to be where God?s omnibenevolence is shown, as it is the perfect world where there is no pain and suffering. To Irenaeus, it is important that the world is imperfect otherwise heaven would not be a reward. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain Hick's Irenaean Theodicy

    It is also important to note that there are degrees of hardness with regards to suffering and in certain cases it can be too intense, for example, the third world suffering in Ethiopia is easily soul destroying and not soul making.

  2. Explain the free will defence. Both the Augustinian and Irenaean theodicies contain the argument ...

    He says since this world contains free agents that often fail to act in a morally good manner; it cannot have been created by an all-powerful, all-loving God.

  1. Article: "Will Brown Faces Again Be a Rarity?" by Jesus Mena.

    There is also an appeal to pity when it is stated, "the numbers are especially stressful." This statement seems to be appealing that pity is an argument for special treating. Thus, subtle wording is being used in this argument. Mena goes on to say that the numbers of minorities currently there need to be preserved.

  2. Irenaen Theodicy cannot justify the existence of evil. Discuss

    Thus evil must exist for there to be a choice as, if there was no evil, there would be no choice and no way for the generic ?human animal? to change and advance into a ?child of God? which possesses morals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work