Explain the main features of the design argument for the existence of God.Science makes the design argument irrelevant assess the claim
Are you in the right place?
Jump to Philosophy and Ethics and see how teachers think you should prepare in:
Extracts from this document...
a.) Explain the main features of the design argument for the existence of God. (AO1 30 marks) To begin with, there are traditional design arguments that seek to explain the existence of a God. Thomas Aquinas used design qua regularity when developing his argument. He reasoned that everything functions to certain purpose and an inanimate object has no rational power so this indicates that an external power must have directed its purpose. To support his argument, he argued that objects such as the earth, the moon, and the planets are somehow endowed with knowledge and intelligence, which mean determine their own place in the universe. For example, the sun and the moon did not work out their orbit for each of them. Therefore, this means someone must have directed it to their purpose. Aquinas strongly believed that the order of the solar system presents valid evidence for the existence of an external being and concluded the being is God.
He argued that the rotation of the planet, and how the obey the same universal laws suggest that they could not have come about by chance. This means that an external agent must have imposed order on the universe. On the other hand, there are also modern design arguments which explain the design argument. Tenant disagreed with the claim that coincidence led to the evolution of human life. He believed that the universe was designed in an evolutionary process to create an environment in which an intelligent life could exist. Tennant concluded that human life part of God's plan. Tennant developed his argument further by suggesting that the world it's not just ordered, but it beautiful. This part of his argument is called the aesthetic argument. Tennant argued that humans have the ability to appreciate this beauty, but it's not necessary for survival. Therefore this evidence suggests a creator. These are four main arguments explain how the world came into existence with or without the influence of God.
Swinburne's argument stated that need an explanation for how the world's fundamental laws works with regularity. He argued that an intelligent being is behind and we can find this when we look how humans tend to behave. For example, we able to nature and observe seeds when planted, therefore we use this information to aid for survival. This indicates that God is caring for humanity, and giving them the autonomy to make our own choices and gain knowledge from experience. Therefore this proves that the divine intelligence is God. I personally believe that science doesn't make the design argument irrelevant. Particular modern design argument tends to their intellect and scientific evidence to prove the existence of God, which is irrelevant. Moreover, I strongly disagree with Richard Dawkin's claim that religion does not encourage. Christians do not need to examine further to find the truth, because they need faith to believe in the existence of God. If God wanted to prove he exists, he would have produced enough evidence. Instead, he gave people the choice to whether to believe him or not.
This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.
Found what you're looking for?
- Start learning 29% faster today
- 150,000+ documents available
- Just £6.99 a month
- Join over 1.2 million students every month
- Accelerate your learning by 29%
- Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month