• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the main features of the design argument for the existence of God.Science makes the design argument irrelevant assess the claim

Extracts from this document...


a.) Explain the main features of the design argument for the existence of God. (AO1 30 marks) To begin with, there are traditional design arguments that seek to explain the existence of a God. Thomas Aquinas used design qua regularity when developing his argument. He reasoned that everything functions to certain purpose and an inanimate object has no rational power so this indicates that an external power must have directed its purpose. To support his argument, he argued that objects such as the earth, the moon, and the planets are somehow endowed with knowledge and intelligence, which mean determine their own place in the universe. For example, the sun and the moon did not work out their orbit for each of them. Therefore, this means someone must have directed it to their purpose. Aquinas strongly believed that the order of the solar system presents valid evidence for the existence of an external being and concluded the being is God. ...read more.


He argued that the rotation of the planet, and how the obey the same universal laws suggest that they could not have come about by chance. This means that an external agent must have imposed order on the universe. On the other hand, there are also modern design arguments which explain the design argument. Tenant disagreed with the claim that coincidence led to the evolution of human life. He believed that the universe was designed in an evolutionary process to create an environment in which an intelligent life could exist. Tennant concluded that human life part of God's plan. Tennant developed his argument further by suggesting that the world it's not just ordered, but it beautiful. This part of his argument is called the aesthetic argument. Tennant argued that humans have the ability to appreciate this beauty, but it's not necessary for survival. Therefore this evidence suggests a creator. These are four main arguments explain how the world came into existence with or without the influence of God. ...read more.


Swinburne's argument stated that need an explanation for how the world's fundamental laws works with regularity. He argued that an intelligent being is behind and we can find this when we look how humans tend to behave. For example, we able to nature and observe seeds when planted, therefore we use this information to aid for survival. This indicates that God is caring for humanity, and giving them the autonomy to make our own choices and gain knowledge from experience. Therefore this proves that the divine intelligence is God. I personally believe that science doesn't make the design argument irrelevant. Particular modern design argument tends to their intellect and scientific evidence to prove the existence of God, which is irrelevant. Moreover, I strongly disagree with Richard Dawkin's claim that religion does not encourage. Christians do not need to examine further to find the truth, because they need faith to believe in the existence of God. If God wanted to prove he exists, he would have produced enough evidence. Instead, he gave people the choice to whether to believe him or not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    This does not however explain the existence of genetic disorders. If God had created evolution to run the way it does, then why would he have included terrible disease passed through generations? Unless God was, as Hume suggests, not all-loving.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    that the universe needs an explanation outside the universe; that the question 'what caused God' is illegitimate; and the kalam argument may be held to point to an originating rather than a conserving cause, and thus to a deist view of God.47 Nevertheless, it does point to the fact that we do not know what caused the Big Bang.

  1. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    Norman Malcolm gave a 20th century version of the second form. In it he argues 7 steps which take him from "God can neither begin to exist or cease to exist" to step 6-7 "God's existence is possible therefore God's existence is necessary."

  2. summary of the design argument

    For example, photosynthesis is vital for our existence and plants do not fail to follow this cycle, furthermore many animals migrate to hotter or colder climates or to breeding grounds at the same time annually or monthly in order to ensure survival.

  1. Outline the main features of virtue ethic

    In another way, it is not enough to be told that I should be patient. To become patient, I need to practice patience. Aristotle believes that every action is directed towards an aim. I get up in the morning because I want to go to work, I go to work

  2. What are Mill’s four main arguments in defence of freedom of speech?

    It fact there are any number of outside influences which may have contributed to this perceived lapse into hypocrisy which it is out with the scope of this essay to discuss. It remains, however, that each example of a possible cause of this lapse detracts from the strength of Mill's argument.

  1. Assess the view that the design argument provides a convincing proof for the existence ...

    be rejected, as it would suggest that all humans would share this power - which clearly we do not. Another major flaw with this criticism is that the world came about long before mankind developed, so how could a human have created it?

  2. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    If this is right, then Aquinas? argument is undermined as he is wrong to claim that a first cause started the chain and the cosmological argument fails. Aquinas presents a further version of the cosmological argument; the argument from contingency.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work