• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the main features of the design argument for the existence of God.Science makes the design argument irrelevant assess the claim

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

a.) Explain the main features of the design argument for the existence of God. (AO1 30 marks) To begin with, there are traditional design arguments that seek to explain the existence of a God. Thomas Aquinas used design qua regularity when developing his argument. He reasoned that everything functions to certain purpose and an inanimate object has no rational power so this indicates that an external power must have directed its purpose. To support his argument, he argued that objects such as the earth, the moon, and the planets are somehow endowed with knowledge and intelligence, which mean determine their own place in the universe. For example, the sun and the moon did not work out their orbit for each of them. Therefore, this means someone must have directed it to their purpose. Aquinas strongly believed that the order of the solar system presents valid evidence for the existence of an external being and concluded the being is God. ...read more.

Middle

He argued that the rotation of the planet, and how the obey the same universal laws suggest that they could not have come about by chance. This means that an external agent must have imposed order on the universe. On the other hand, there are also modern design arguments which explain the design argument. Tenant disagreed with the claim that coincidence led to the evolution of human life. He believed that the universe was designed in an evolutionary process to create an environment in which an intelligent life could exist. Tennant concluded that human life part of God's plan. Tennant developed his argument further by suggesting that the world it's not just ordered, but it beautiful. This part of his argument is called the aesthetic argument. Tennant argued that humans have the ability to appreciate this beauty, but it's not necessary for survival. Therefore this evidence suggests a creator. These are four main arguments explain how the world came into existence with or without the influence of God. ...read more.

Conclusion

Swinburne's argument stated that need an explanation for how the world's fundamental laws works with regularity. He argued that an intelligent being is behind and we can find this when we look how humans tend to behave. For example, we able to nature and observe seeds when planted, therefore we use this information to aid for survival. This indicates that God is caring for humanity, and giving them the autonomy to make our own choices and gain knowledge from experience. Therefore this proves that the divine intelligence is God. I personally believe that science doesn't make the design argument irrelevant. Particular modern design argument tends to their intellect and scientific evidence to prove the existence of God, which is irrelevant. Moreover, I strongly disagree with Richard Dawkin's claim that religion does not encourage. Christians do not need to examine further to find the truth, because they need faith to believe in the existence of God. If God wanted to prove he exists, he would have produced enough evidence. Instead, he gave people the choice to whether to believe him or not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    God's existence is a necessary presupposition of there being any moral judgements that are objective, that go beyond mere relativistic moral preferences; such judgements require standards external to any human mind-that is, they presume God's mind.51 Although, a person may know that God is omnipresent but that does not mean they fully understand his being.

  2. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    Norman Malcolm gave a 20th century version of the second form. In it he argues 7 steps which take him from "God can neither begin to exist or cease to exist" to step 6-7 "God's existence is possible therefore God's existence is necessary."

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    Darwin's theory of evolution is probably the biggest threat to the teleological argument as it explains a natural way that everything has developed to its current state, yet is in extreme conflict with the Christian view of the creation of the universe: * Genesis claims that God created man and

  2. Outline the main features of virtue ethic

    In another way, it is not enough to be told that I should be patient. To become patient, I need to practice patience. Aristotle believes that every action is directed towards an aim. I get up in the morning because I want to go to work, I go to work

  1. summary of the design argument

    For example, photosynthesis is vital for our existence and plants do not fail to follow this cycle, furthermore many animals migrate to hotter or colder climates or to breeding grounds at the same time annually or monthly in order to ensure survival.

  2. Assess the view that the design argument provides a convincing proof for the existence ...

    be rejected, as it would suggest that all humans would share this power - which clearly we do not. Another major flaw with this criticism is that the world came about long before mankind developed, so how could a human have created it?

  1. Discuss the characteristics of the scientific method which makes it superior over other methods ...

    Theories which cannot be tested, because, for instance, they have no observable ramifications, do not qualify as scientific theories. One of the key factors of scientific method is that the theory must be falsifable. Sir Karl Popper (1902-1994): Falsificationism (1993)

  2. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    is meaningless and absurd, if this is true then it would greatly undermine the argument. The most profound weakness is the ?Fallacy of composition?, which is the misconception of thinking that there is a property or predicate to each part of a given group, it must be logically follow that the whole group has the same properties or predicates.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work