• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the main weaknesses of Benthams version of Utilitarianism. Does Mills version of Utilitarianism avoid the problems associated with Benthams?

Extracts from this document...


Explain the main weaknesses of Bentham's version of Utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham never classed himself as, or was classed by others in his time as an Act Utilitarian. This is merely a label that has been assigned to him in future years, to solidify and categorise his ethics in somewhere by which an onlooker can begin to understand them. However, Act Utilitarianism ethics throw up many weaknesses, many of which can be deeply scrutinized and developed. One of the main weaknesses of Bentham's version of Utilitarianism is that there is the potential to justify any act. This is because Bentham's version is based, yes on the consequences of an action, but on the pleasure gained from an action. For example, if seven men were walking down an alley and stabbed a girl to death, then according to Bentham's device 'The Hedonic Calculus' the amount of the men's pleasure would completely outweigh the amount of the woman's pain, and would therefore make the action of killing the women morally right. ...read more.


Not only is this a huge flaw as I have previously stated, but to measure up consequences is another big weakness. Surely consequence is not measurable because we do not know when a consequence will end? For example, a man falls over in the street, but a boy comes over to help him up. To most, this seems like a morally right thing to do. However, the man may then stand up, walk on and then murder someone. This is seen as another major loophole in Bentham's thinking. When do consequences of our actions really come to an end? How can one judge amounts of pleasure, and weigh it up side by side with measures of pain? These are but a few questions that arise after scrutinising Bentham's reasoning, and exploiting his weaknesses. Mill's version of Utilitarianism avoids the problems associated with Bentham's. Discuss. ...read more.


amount of happiness is so low, that the small amount of happiness that the men are attaining from the action does not add up enough to be seen as acceptable in comparison to the pain and suffering the woman is experiencing. This would make the action morally wrong. Saying this however means in no way that Mill's version of Utilitarianism is bulletproof, there are still weaknesses in it. One being that it is still difficult to predict the consequences of an action, and therefore difficult to make an ethical decision about the action, but the other being that it is extremely difficult for anyone to define what actually constitutes as happiness. How can one measure up and compare happiness with pain, and vice versa? It seem Mill's version of Utilitarianism does not avoid Bentham's weaknesses, as it poses that we as humans, we humans that do not always make the right decisions, have to picture in our heads the measure of happiness to pain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. What are the Main Features of Utilitarianism as an Ethical Theory?

    For example, the rule 'never tell lies' and the rule 'protect life' clearly conflict so if a mass murderer was to ask where the hiding place of his next victim was the utilitarian would simple lie to him where as people who might follow a rule based approach will be forced to break one of these rules.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of utilitarianism, what are the main problems of ...

    Act utilitarianism is flexible; it is able to take into account various situations. A critique of act utilitarianism is that it has the possibility to justify almost any act, if it creates the greatest amount of pleasure. We may not be information from the hedonic calculus in all situations, this

  1. Explain Mills Version of Utilitarianism. Mills version of utilitarianism is morally unacceptable. Discuss.

    and the rest of the body was for the appetites, for desire. He said that we aiming to pleasure the mind, that the head should rule your heart all of the time. Mill said we should aim for the higher pleasures at the top of the body than the lower pleasures.

  2. Outline and explain the ethical theory of utilitarianism b) ...

    In Mills theory, it clearly addresses the problem of the pleasure of the majority being abused by them to the detriment of the minority. The benefits of utilitarianism are sizeable, as one can see where in modern day life and in organisations it would work, for example hospitals where budgets

  1. Analyse and explain the strengths and weaknesses of deontology

    One rather feels that Kant is not justifying the existence of such a being through his argument, but rather using God to help support his argument, which is a very different thing.

  2. Examine how Benthams utilitarianism may be applied to one ethical issue of your choice. ...

    is seen as a higher pleasure. * Remoteness - When will the pleasure/pain occur? If the pleasure is to occur immediately, rather than in the future, it is seen as a higher pleasure. * Certainty - the likeliness the pleasure/pain will occur.

  1. Examine the key features of utilitarianism and its strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    in a certain circumstance, as an overall principle lying cannot be supported because in the end it does not support the greatest good for the greatest number. Mill acknowledged by breaking the rule may contribute to an individual's short term happiness but is detrimental to long term happiness for all those concerned, this was then known as rule utilitarianism.

  2. "Explain Bentham's Utilitarianism" and Act Utilitarianism has immoral consequences Discuss.

    based purely on the word of God, which may not always produce a good outcome, as Divine Command would state that you cannot steal in any circumstances, whereas Utilitarianism would argue that the pleasure it gives the thief (e.g feeding himself/his family)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work