• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the ontological argument from Anselm and Descartes.

Extracts from this document...


Explain the ontological argument from Anselm and Descartes. "Ontological" literally means, "concerned with being". The ontological argument attempts to prove God's existence through theoretical reasoning alone. The argument is entirely a priori, meaning it involves no empirical evidence at all. Rather, the argument begins with an explanation of the concept of God, and seeks to demonstrate that God exists on the basis of that concept alone. It does not rely on our observations of the universe, the world around us. It uses logic, and the idea that it is illogical to say that God does not exist, as its main argument. This argument was most classically put forward by Anselm (1033-1109) in his book entitled "Proslogion". The argument was criticised in his own time and centuries later by philosophers such as Aquinas and Kant. Among those who have supported it lays Descartes. The argument works better for those who already believe in God than for the atheist. It is doubtful Anselm intended for the ontological argument to appeal to the atheist. ...read more.


Anselm says that a necessary being is far greater than a contingent being, which has to depend on something to exist. A contingent being which is dependant, cannot be the greatest conceivable being. He believes this 'necessary existence' quality is unique to the greatest conceivable being and not for anything else with a contingent existence because a contingent being is not the greatest conceivable being that can be thought. For Anselm, God's reality is inescapable and he is trying to express this in his argument. He is trying to understand more fully what he already believes. This is very different from trying to prove God's existence to someone who does not accept it. Rene Descartes (1596-1650) took this argument a little further. He was a supporter of the ontological argument, had to adapt his argument to make it work His version of the argument is some way clearer than that of Anselm. He declared that to say that God does not exist is a logical contradiction. ...read more.


Instead of defining God as a being than which nothing greater can be conceived, Descartes defines God simply as "a supremely perfect being." Overall, Descartes and Anselm both believe in the existence of God. Descartes tried to prove God's existence and he believes that because God is a supremely perfect being, He possesses all perfections. Anselm believes that God exists, he is a believer in God and he tries to prove that God exists in his second form of the argument. For Anselm there is no doubt that existence makes a thing more perfect so to say that the most perfect thing must have existence as one of its characteristics is clearly logical. Hence Anselm's agreement with the Psalmist who says, 'only the fool says in his heart there is no God'. The Ontological Argument claims to arrive at the existence of God by analysing the idea of God and this idea does not depend on experience - it is therefore an a priori argument. Anselm and Descartes expand on this idea and try to prove the existence of God. ?? ?? ?? ?? Gurleen Chaggar LVI5 Miss. Thacker Philosophy Essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    Kant argued that existence, in the form which Descartes presented it, was not a true predicate to anything; Kant maintained that, for something to be a true predicate, it must change our perception of the object it refers to: a valid predicate to a book may be hard backed, it

  2. Evaluate Descartes Method of Doubt

    right in front of us, totally into doubt However, in his quest for knowledge and a water tight argument, Descartes again adds another caveat.

  1. Does the ontological argument work?

    because you are making an illogical jump in the argument, de dicto de re ("Ontos" deriving from the Latin meaning of an illegitimate jump in an argument). Norman Malcolm, a disciple of Wittgenstein developed on Anselm's second argument as well and said that God must exist because the statement, "God necessarily exists".

  2. Outline the ontological argument as presented by Anselm and Descartes.

    of me than just the idea of a chocolate bar in front of me. His next few points take a bit more explaining. Anselm said that if we can conceive of a being than which none can be greater conceived, surly if he was so magnificent, he would exist in reality as well as in the mind.

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Hume describes causation as a feeling of expectation we get when we have experienced a constant conjunction of events. The teleological argument is the argument from the order in the world to the existence of a being that created it with a specific purpose in mind.

  2. Explain Descartes' Ontological Argument

    This again rests on the doctrine of clear and distinct ideas. Descartes argues that what one can perceive clearly and distinctively is true. Because we can clearly and distinctively perceive the connection between God and God?s existence, it follows that God must exist.


    The conclusion that Anselm reaches is that because God is the greatest being that can be thought of, part of a ?being? or ?thing? of any sort is that you exist. So God must exist. For Anselm, God?s existence is thus analytic.

  2. Explain Anselm and Descartes ontological argument

    it is greater to have a pile of money than to think of money, therefore it is impossible to think that God does not exist.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work