• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the ontological argument from Anselm and Descartes.

Extracts from this document...


Explain the ontological argument from Anselm and Descartes. "Ontological" literally means, "concerned with being". The ontological argument attempts to prove God's existence through theoretical reasoning alone. The argument is entirely a priori, meaning it involves no empirical evidence at all. Rather, the argument begins with an explanation of the concept of God, and seeks to demonstrate that God exists on the basis of that concept alone. It does not rely on our observations of the universe, the world around us. It uses logic, and the idea that it is illogical to say that God does not exist, as its main argument. This argument was most classically put forward by Anselm (1033-1109) in his book entitled "Proslogion". The argument was criticised in his own time and centuries later by philosophers such as Aquinas and Kant. Among those who have supported it lays Descartes. The argument works better for those who already believe in God than for the atheist. It is doubtful Anselm intended for the ontological argument to appeal to the atheist. ...read more.


Anselm says that a necessary being is far greater than a contingent being, which has to depend on something to exist. A contingent being which is dependant, cannot be the greatest conceivable being. He believes this 'necessary existence' quality is unique to the greatest conceivable being and not for anything else with a contingent existence because a contingent being is not the greatest conceivable being that can be thought. For Anselm, God's reality is inescapable and he is trying to express this in his argument. He is trying to understand more fully what he already believes. This is very different from trying to prove God's existence to someone who does not accept it. Rene Descartes (1596-1650) took this argument a little further. He was a supporter of the ontological argument, had to adapt his argument to make it work His version of the argument is some way clearer than that of Anselm. He declared that to say that God does not exist is a logical contradiction. ...read more.


Instead of defining God as a being than which nothing greater can be conceived, Descartes defines God simply as "a supremely perfect being." Overall, Descartes and Anselm both believe in the existence of God. Descartes tried to prove God's existence and he believes that because God is a supremely perfect being, He possesses all perfections. Anselm believes that God exists, he is a believer in God and he tries to prove that God exists in his second form of the argument. For Anselm there is no doubt that existence makes a thing more perfect so to say that the most perfect thing must have existence as one of its characteristics is clearly logical. Hence Anselm's agreement with the Psalmist who says, 'only the fool says in his heart there is no God'. The Ontological Argument claims to arrive at the existence of God by analysing the idea of God and this idea does not depend on experience - it is therefore an a priori argument. Anselm and Descartes expand on this idea and try to prove the existence of God. ?? ?? ?? ?? Gurleen Chaggar LVI5 Miss. Thacker Philosophy Essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Analyze the distinctive features of the Ontological Argument

    According to Russell the argument is a Syllogism it starts off with reasonable premises and attempt to prove something which one cannot actually prove.

  2. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    no greater can be conceived, could be thought of as a common truth, and any conclusions drawn from this concept could be held as truth. However, even if we were to take a platonic view of the world, we would still have to deny Kant's second criticism.

  1. Evaluate Descartes Method of Doubt

    right in front of us, totally into doubt However, in his quest for knowledge and a water tight argument, Descartes again adds another caveat.

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Hume describes causation as a feeling of expectation we get when we have experienced a constant conjunction of events. The teleological argument is the argument from the order in the world to the existence of a being that created it with a specific purpose in mind.

  1. Outline the ontological argument as presented by Anselm and Descartes.

    of God in our mind, God therefore exists, in what he called, 'the understanding'. Anselm's next point was to say that it is far better to exist in reality rather than the mind. Once again, this is straightforward. I would much rather have a bar of chocolate sat in front

  2. Explain Anselm and Descartes ontological argument

    Kant states that existence is not a predicate; this is stating that if X exists it does not tell us anything about X; this is explained in this quote ?By whatever predicates we may conceive of a thing, we do not make the least addition to the thing when we further declare the thing is?.


    both in the intellect and outside it, it does not follow that there is no possibility of God not existing. And so he concludes that God has to exist and cannot fail to exist.

  2. Explain Descartes' Ontological Argument

    actually exists.? Descartes then refutes this point by saying that the relationship between God and existence is not like the relationship between mountain and existence, but rather the relationship between mountain and valley. Just as the idea of a valley is implied by the idea of a mountain, the idea of existence is implied by the idea of God.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work