• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the problem of evil (25 marks). Are the theodicies attempts to deal with moral and natural evil and suffering doomed, in the face of so much evil and suffering?

Extracts from this document...


The problem of evil A) Explain the problem of evil (25 marks) The fact that there is evil in the world is a problem for theists as they claim to worship a god who is all-knowing, all- powerful and completely good, the problem arises because surely such a being would be aware of evil and suffering in the world as they are all-knowing , would have the power to prevent it from happening as he is all-powerful and as he is supposedly completely good ,and he would not allow for such evil to ever even occur, as Christians believe him to bear all three of these divine attributes , the allowance of evil to persist on a daily basis throughout the world surely disproves the existence of God. There are two separate types of evil that affect the world, firstly there is moral evil. Moral evil defines the bad actions of us as humans such as: rape, theft and murder, where as Natural evil makes reference to the natural processes of the world such as: volcanoes, earthquakes and forest fires, it is said that as humans commit such atrocities as murder through moral evil , natural evil occurs as punishment. ...read more.


the fawn endures is pointless , yet it is nature , surely a wholly good God would end this suffering quickly as it is pointless. To conclude, the problem of evil lies in that devoted theists such as Christians and Muslims believe in a God who possesses all of the divine attributes and yet suffering is so prominent , they believe in such a God regardless of what evil may strike them in their lifetimes yet surely their God would protect the devotee from having to experience such pain. The problem of evil however is only a challenge for the religious, for atheists this is not an issue as they do not believe in a God who should be responsible for it, the existence of evil is the biggest destroyer of the belief in God. B) Are the theodicies' attempts to deal with moral and natural evil and suffering doomed, in the face of so much evil and suffering? Each of the theodicies oppose atheism and attempt to prove that God holds all of the divine attributes he supposedly has , regardless of the evil in the world. Firstly is Augustine's theodicy. ...read more.


A criticism to Leibniz's theodicy comes from Voltaire, a French writer. Voltaire published a novel named 'Candide' , in the novel a character named Dr Pangloss regularly announces that this is the best world possible, eventually Candid witnesses the hanging of Dr Pangloss and states " If this is the best possible world, what can the others be like?" , Voltaire contrasts the horrific pain and suffering in the world against Leibniz's theodicy. To conclude, the theodicies' attempts to deal with moral and natural evil in the face of so much evil and suffering are doomed, as each of the criticisms against them bring into question how a God who holds each of the divine attributes can justify such suffering in the world as a means to an end in the next life. In my opinions , the existence of Hell alone blows the theistic ideal of a God out of the water as it simply connotes that some humans will have to experience large amounts of pain infinitely to God's approval, thus God cannot justify suffering in this life as he has the power to inflict it on mortals forever should they rebel against the system in their life previous to the afterlife. ?? ?? ?? ?? Kate Verity Blueman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain how the theodicy of Irenaeus differs from that of Augustine and Evil cannot ...

    For instance with the theodicy of Irenaeus it is claimed that suffering is part of the test of life and that through this process we grow closer to God. Yet if this is the case why is suffering not equally spread out through all people?

  2. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    In his theodicy, Irenaeus argues that the creation of humans in the likeness and image of God. First, humans are made in the image of God; this stage of creation is Irenaeus claims, incomplete, so in order to achieve perfection, according to Jordan, it must be developed via free choice as well as co-operation with other humans as well.

  1. In what ways may suffering create a philosophical problem for religious believers? Outline 2 ...

    Human beings deserve to suffer because the first parents (Adam and Eve) who were sinned by misusing their free will. Augustine saw original sin as working in two ways, inherited guilt for a crime and spiritual sickness/weakness. This made the presence of evil in the world easier to understand, and


    This means evil is not an entity, but a lack of goodness or righteousness therefore evil only happens when good goes wrong.

  1. ) Explain the theodicies of Irenaeus and Augustine ?

    no suffering however Adam and Eve brought it about through their disobedience it is there for our fault it is here and we should learn from it in order to become the better people we were given the capability of being.

  2. What is meant by the problem of evil and suffering for religious believers? Examine ...

    Humans were created imperfectly because attaining the likeliness of God requires willing cooperation from individuals, for which God gave them freewill. The universe was created with the possibility of evil, and humans have freewill to do both good and evil.

  1. Irenaen Theodicy cannot justify the existence of evil. Discuss

    Therefore ?evil? is a way for humans to learn and evil also allows us to empathise with each other which lets us help others that need it; how could you help a hungry person if they did not know they were hungry?

  2. Evaluate the claim that the existence of natural evil in the world makes it ...

    Consequently, God has no right to intervene and put a stop to suffering; theoretically, we cannot complain about natural evil as, according to Augustine, we deserve what we get. Augustine argues that, as evil originates from Adam and not God, it is possible for an all loving all powerful God to exist alongside natural evil.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work