• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain two versions of the ontological argument for the existence of God

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explain two versions of the ontological argument for the existence of God Ontological Arguments are based on ontology which is the study of the nature of being. They attempt to prove the existence of God on an entirely logical basis using 'a priori' (without empirical evidence) reasoning and deduction (reasoning by logical premises to reach a conclusion). In Anselm's ontological argument he begins with a definition of the God before going on to argue that existence is a predicate (quality) of God. He defines God as 'a being that which nothing greater can be conceived'. In this context 'greater' is synonymous with 'perfect' and conceived refers to anything that can be thought of. ...read more.

Middle

In other words, God must exist in re (in reality) not just in the mind (in intellectu) or else he would not be perfect. In Anselm's second form of his argument he argues that God not only exists but he is a necessary being (self-causing) and by extension cannot not exist. He makes the point that if God existed in intellectu alone as a contingent being, then we could conceive of a necessary being which by extension would be more perfect than God. This would be contrary to Anselm's definition of God as a being that which nothing greater could be conceived so therefore God must exist necessarily or without cause. ...read more.

Conclusion

This would be illogical as a supremely perfect being must have 'all the perfections'. In Descartes argument he doesn't require the stating of a definition but instead relies on an innate idea of the perception of God. To further demonstrate his argument he used various analogies to convey the idea of inherent ideas. In one of these analogies he discusses how a triangle must have three sides or else it would cease to be a triangle. Similarly God must be exist necessarily as an innate concept as with the triangle. A being without necessary existence wouldn't be God, just as a shape without three sides wouldn't be a triangle. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    to the ontological argument - Both Anselm and Descartes's arguments hinger on existence being a property one can assign to God. Ontological arguments are also subject to many parodies, the first being Gaunilo's perfect island, and as such can be thrown into the realms of absurdity; a serious flaw is

  2. Give an account of the ontological argument for the existence of God

    You would always be adding to it and changing things to make it a perfect island. He said that is you were to believe that you could create such an island then you would be a fool to believe it.

  1. Utopia - The Impossibility of Perfection

    state that can only exist in one's wistful imagination, the Commonwealth from William Shakespeare's last play The Tempest is much more explicitly a creation of fancy. It is plausible that Shakespeare at least knew of More's work; and while The Tempest may not be a direct response to Utopia, it

  2. Synoptic Study, Satre, Engels and Marx

    It is the works exploitation which allows the capitalist to profit and creates the class struggle which eventually will destroy the current society leaving communism to take over in which man will be free from alienation and reunited with their human nature.

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    and second of all some beliefs by philosophers thought to be a priori truths about the world were mistaken and proved otherwise by science. For example to Aristotle inertia seemed self-evidently impossible. Hume claims that a priori 'self-evidence' truths can't be trusted as a guide to truth in the actual world.

  2. The Metamorphosis: Existence.

    He does not share with the community for he ignores all women in which a relationship is likely to occur since it is not something he has the time for. This prevention to live the typical life is an awareness that Gregor truly does not know how to live.

  1. Outline the Ontological Argument for the existence of God.

    more than you can the angles of a triangle equalling two right angles as it is an analytic statement.

  2. Conscience is innate. Discuss

    For Freud, the mind is split into 3 parts; Instinctive Desires (Id), Super-Ego and Ego. The immature conscience can be identified with mass feelings of guilt, reinforced and conditioned by childhood as previously stated for example, going to Sunday service at church as that?s what you did as a child

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work