• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain what is meant by moral absolutism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

a) Explain what is meant by moral absolutism? Moral absolutism is the ethical theory which believes that there are always absolute rules of which moral questions can be judged against. It means that certain actions are either right or wrong. Moral absolutists will judge the actions of those who steal, child abuse, murder etc. as being absolutely immorally wrong, regardless of ones belief or ones situation therefore making it impersonal. It is based on the deontological argument, people are led on a set of rules which people must obey. These pay no regard to exceptions and are set in stone. Moral absolutism adapts the theory that certain actions are either right or that they are wrong, regardless of when or why they happened to begin with. ...read more.

Middle

Rather than moral relativism where everything changes according to the situation it's put up against. It provides safety to mankind because justice would always been made because the laws always stay the same no matter what. For example, if the previous situation was based on moral relativism then the person who killed the other would be let free without a punishment because they weren't the one who initiated the attack. Then how can you say justice has been made, when someone has just gotten away with murder, purely because of the situation it was up against? Absolutism has no room to manoeuvre, it is the fixed truth and can never be manipulated. The famous philosopher Louis Pojan, who lived from 1935-2005, emphasises that a moral absolutist does not have to believe that all moral laws are universally ...read more.

Conclusion

They pay no regard to the type of situation and have been around since beginning of Christianity. Rules such as ?Thou shall not bear false witness? and ?Thou shall not steal? are one of the main rules that they follow. We can clearly understand from this that all the rules are generic and do not take a personal attack over something in particular. We also know absolute rules are based on 'a priori' events, which basically means that they are not dependant on a given experience but contain a logically necessary conclusion. The consequences of our actions are irrelevant to whether they are right or wrong. Evil actions may accidentally have good outcomes whereas acting heroically could actually result in a worse outcome. Moral absolutism is much easier to apply than moral relativism because the laws and actions will always stay the same. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Critically examine what is meant by natural moral law.

    According to natural law however, the rule 'do not steal' should be universalised and therefore never broken. Aquinas did come up with an idea of proportionalism. Proportanalism states that when there is a proportionate reason to break a rule i.e.

  2. Explain what is meant by Moral Relativism

    Many people in the west would push for the abolition of child labour, however if this were to be carried out it would result in the following situation: the children would become worse of as they would still receive no education or financial support from the state and to worsen

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    For example, when Erich Fromm says that "love is the only sane and satisfactory answet to the problem of human existence," he speaks and describes love exactly as a Christian would-except that he does not bring God into it. He thinks Christianly but talks humanistically.

  2. Examine what is meant by situation ethics

    3.Positivism- this is accepting to act in love by faith rather than by reason, once faith is declared it is supported by logic. In situation ethics positing a belief in God as love or a higher good and then reasoning what is required in any situation to support that belief.

  1. Explain what is meant by 'moral relativism'

    Thus some people may believe one action to be right, whereas others may believe it to be wrong whether it is a cultural or social belief. This means that everybody should be tolerant and be respectful of other people's beliefs and behaviour.

  2. Capital Punishment

    when he pleases, but he does not give us as humans the permission or does not grant us the will to take away another humans life rather that its his purpose. In addition, until God gives us the right or taking away a human life, human lives should be preserved,

  1. Can moral absolutism be justified?

    of higher importance that doing something just because it is believed to be intrinsically right. This is prominent in the teachings of Jesus Christ. Another weakness in the appliance of moral absolutism is the disagreement it could cause amongst different cultures.

  2. Explain the differences between Cultural Relativism and Cultural Absolutism

    This is the Emptiness Problem. If we cannot get our morals from a higher being, then where do they come from? Most atheists would agree that our morals depend on our upbringing, our culture and education. However, these values are not absolute.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work