• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain what is meant by moral absolutism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

a) Explain what is meant by moral absolutism? Moral absolutism is the ethical theory which believes that there are always absolute rules of which moral questions can be judged against. It means that certain actions are either right or wrong. Moral absolutists will judge the actions of those who steal, child abuse, murder etc. as being absolutely immorally wrong, regardless of ones belief or ones situation therefore making it impersonal. It is based on the deontological argument, people are led on a set of rules which people must obey. These pay no regard to exceptions and are set in stone. Moral absolutism adapts the theory that certain actions are either right or that they are wrong, regardless of when or why they happened to begin with. ...read more.

Middle

Rather than moral relativism where everything changes according to the situation it's put up against. It provides safety to mankind because justice would always been made because the laws always stay the same no matter what. For example, if the previous situation was based on moral relativism then the person who killed the other would be let free without a punishment because they weren't the one who initiated the attack. Then how can you say justice has been made, when someone has just gotten away with murder, purely because of the situation it was up against? Absolutism has no room to manoeuvre, it is the fixed truth and can never be manipulated. The famous philosopher Louis Pojan, who lived from 1935-2005, emphasises that a moral absolutist does not have to believe that all moral laws are universally ...read more.

Conclusion

They pay no regard to the type of situation and have been around since beginning of Christianity. Rules such as ?Thou shall not bear false witness? and ?Thou shall not steal? are one of the main rules that they follow. We can clearly understand from this that all the rules are generic and do not take a personal attack over something in particular. We also know absolute rules are based on 'a priori' events, which basically means that they are not dependant on a given experience but contain a logically necessary conclusion. The consequences of our actions are irrelevant to whether they are right or wrong. Evil actions may accidentally have good outcomes whereas acting heroically could actually result in a worse outcome. Moral absolutism is much easier to apply than moral relativism because the laws and actions will always stay the same. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Can moral absolutism be justified?

    actions will be, so by having moral guidelines it makes it feasible to decide on a morally good action. Furthermore, some actions are almost unanimously agreed to be right or wrong. An example of this would be rape as most would agree that rape is morally unjustifiable in any situation and therefore wrong.

  2. Critically examine what is meant by natural moral law.

    If, as Aquinas believed, morality is based on reason then why is it that in a moral predicament we actually act on our emotions? For instance if one is in a crash and one has an option to save ones child or a doctor that is about to crack a cure for cancer, which is one likely to choose?

  1. Explain what is meant by Moral Relativism

    Situation ethics allows people to make their own decisions and use their freedom of choice to do so. It also explains why there are different cultural expressions and prohibits the dominance of one single culture. However regimes such as the Nazi regime can be looked upon by relativists as wrong.

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    Roy E. McDonald. fact that doctors are among our most conservative people, and therefore the very idea of collectivism is alien to their social values, therefore the very idea of collectivism is alien to their social values, but the hospital is obviously a radical collective.

  1. Examine what is meant by situation ethics

    For example the Catholic Church undertook the natural law approach to guide them in terms of their sexual behaviour. They saw the natural purpose for sexual intercourse to be procreation, so therefore anything that proves to be a barrier to this end result is not allowed i.e.

  2. Capital Punishment

    On the other hand there is a brief outline of the truth as Jesus is resurrected for a short time and met three women... 'Suddenly Jesus met them. "Greetings," he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him'17.

  1. Shakespeare's Purpose in Subverting the "Moral Universe" in Hamlet, Measure for Measure, and the ...

    His father is dead, his mother is lost to him, he is seeing ghosts, and he cannot trust those around him. Shakespeare's purpose in subverting the "moral universe" was to accentuate the unnaturalness of the acts and the appearance of the ghost.

  2. Explain the differences between Cultural Relativism and Cultural Absolutism

    it is important to uphold basic moral values which are the same worldwide. This is supported by the ?golden rule? or the idea that you should treat others how you want to be treated. This rule is found in all religious scripture albeit in different ways, for example ?Love your

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work