• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain what is meant by Moral Relativism. Assess the strengths the weaknesses of situations ethics.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain what is meant by Moral Relativism. Assess the strengths the weaknesses of situations ethics. Part one: Every choice we make is due to each person individual morality. Morality is concerned with the free choice of rational human beings. Relativism shows that there are no absolute moral rules and each situation needs to be examined individually. Therefore moral relativism is the belief that morality does not relate to any absolute standards of right and wrong but good and bad are dependant on culture and circumstance. According to moral relativists there is nothing that is absolutely, invariably right or wrong, and there is no universal standard by which to measure our character or our actions. A course of action can therefore be right for a person but wrong for another or the some based on culture and society. Different views or interpretations can be equally valid for different people. They believe that everyone one should be tolerant of other people's beliefs and behaviour. ...read more.

Middle

For example the government says that murder is wrong so people don't murder. He also claims that if we believe morality has some kind of objective then it is difficult to know what form this absolute form must take. Relativists believe that you cannot say that one system is right or is better than the other. However sometimes society has to make rules that go one way or the other. Breaking these rules constitutes breaking a social contract. However there are many criticisms of moral relativism. One is that however extreme a action is there will always be some way to justify that it is right. This type of thinking would lead to mayhem. It also never actually condemns anything no matter how evil the situation may be. Also as they are accepting of all cultures whatever there views are they would not be able to condemn the people responsible for 9/11. Another criticism is that it is constantly contradicting itself. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also it is based on love that, rationally as well as emotionally is a key feature of all moral situations. For Christians it provides a way to make Christian decisions not mentioned in the bible e.g. fox hunting. But on the other hand there are also some significant disadvantages to situation ethics. The simple rule of what would be the most loving thing to do can be broken easily with a lack of will power. Not everyone may have the strength in character or may just not be bothered to start asking, "where is the love " for every situation they may face. Also you can't trust all human beings with that amount of power for example people would be able to justify killing someone because they were born with a slight learning disability. Two people using situation ethics both claim to be acting out of love and come to different conclusions. It would be impossible to judge which one was right Roman Catholics would feel it is wrong to appeal to individual circumstances to justify decisions which go against the decisions of the church. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. What is Natural Moral Law? What are the strengths and weaknesses of NML?

    Furthermore, how do we know what we are really supposed to do? We are told to fulfil our potential - but what is it? Do we have children or not have children? These choices are subjective and are ones individuals choose on their own accord - therefore our potential is chosen by us.

  2. Explain what is meant by Moral Relativism

    This proves a major problem in moral relativism, it the most knowledgeable people have different moral beliefs, then there is no way of proving that one is right and the other wrong. There is no universal authority. It could be argued that because there are no restrictions there is little

  1. Examine the key features of utilitarianism and its strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    utilitarian would choose but then you have let your own mother die. You have a special responsibility to your mum as she is your family and she brought you up and you both love each other. So this is a dilemma that some utilitarian's may have to face, as is

  2. Analyse and explain the strengths and weaknesses of deontology

    If we take this to the extreme, can any theory be truly deontological without relying on eschatological claims unless its commandments are purely arbitrary? As Barbara Herman argues, what value would there be in following your duty if it did not lead to any good at all?

  1. Explain Fletcher's theory of Situation Ethics (13) and Assess the strengths and weaknesses of ...

    requirements might not necessarily be interpreted as having a binding character and duty may well require them to be broken. Fletcher writes of the characteristic concept agape. Agape is an attitude of the will expressing a disinterested concern for anyone.

  2. Explain What Is Meant By Situation Ethics.

    Utilitarianism is very much the antithesis of situation Ethics, for utilitarianists they evaluate the morality or otherwise of an act in terms of its consequences. Thus, if an action produces good results, it is morally acceptable, if it produces ill consequences, it is not.

  1. Business Ethics

    > Intentional amoral managers * Simply believe that ethical considerations are for our private lives, not for business. There are people who reject the idea that business and ethics should mix. Believe that business activity resides outside the sphere to which moral judgments apply.

  2. Situation Ethics and Moral Decision Making.

    Last of all there is ?decisions are made situationally?. This is basically saying that moral decisions can only be made at the time, and cannot be predetermined. Situation Ethics can be applied to many situations and it must be noted that they are made hypothetically, on each individual situation and not pre-determined with fixed rules to follow.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work