• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than expression of opinions.

Extracts from this document...


Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than expression of opinions. (33) Before this question can be answered, terms such as meta- ethics and theories associated with this topic must be explained to ensure that all the terms are understood in the correct way. Meta- Ethics explores the meaning and function of moral language. Instead of looking at whether abortion is right or wrong, meta- ethics looks at methods to use and how to approach the issue. Meta- ethics is important because if there is 'no agreement about the meaning of ethical language (some argue that it has no real meaning at all), then ethical debate is pointless and will never achieve anything.'(1) Meta- ethics looks at questions like, What, if anything, do we mean when we use words such as 'good' or 'bad, 'right' or 'wrong?' When we use these words, what are we doing? Are we expressing our approval? And do we all mean the same when we say something is good? This is harder to answer than it first appears. A meta- ethical theory, unlike a normative ethical theory, does not contain any ethical evaluations. Some of the approaches used are divided into cognitivist and non- cognitivist views. Cognitivist views hold the opinion that moral statements are about facts, things that are true or false. ...read more.


(6) Moral Skepticism: holds the view that ethical statements are generally false. 'We can not sufficiently justify any ethical claims, and therefore maintain doubt about whether they are true or false.' (5) So when scholars say ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinions they could be correct, but at the same time they could be erroneous. Moral subjectivism would back up the claim that ethical statements are expressions of opinion because subjectivism states that things are true or false dependant upon the individual. So if person X thinks abortion is wrong, then that's their opinion, and if person Y thinks abortion is justifiable, then it's their opinion so it is also correct. So therefore, ethical statements are opinions based upon the individual and therefore, opinions would differ from place to place. On the other hand, ethical naturalism says that it is possible to establish moral facts, so therefore, ethical statements must be more than opinions otherwise it would not be possible to determine this. Naturalism is well presented in the works of Mill. G.E.Moore argues that 'ethical naturalism makes a mistake, and that moral statements cannot be verified simply by looking at the evidence available.' (1) This mistake is known as the 'Naturalistic Fallacy.' Non- cognitivism (emotivism) ...read more.


If not, then ethical statements could be like expressions of feelings, as everyone's would be different. Moore believed that it is still possible for us to decide whether moral statement is true or false, even if we cannot use our powers of observation to give us the answers. According to Moore, we cannot use our five senses to determine whether something's right or wrong, but use our 'moral intuition.' 'There is no way that we can explain yellow, especially to someone who has never seen it, and if we try to say what it is like, we end up giving examples of yellow things rather than defining yellow itself; but we still know what's yellow when we see it.' (1) It could be said that it is just not a matter of opinion, but something that we can be certain about. In conclusion, I think ethical statements are more than just matters of opinion and I think certain theories within this, for example emotivism, takes away the value ethical statements should bare. Although certain theories like intuitionism have some truth, it is hard to pin point the 'exact truth' as there are so many different opinions and theories to consider. Therefore, it could be considered ethical statements are mere expressions of opinion, but as intuitionism says, there are objective moral principles and we have an intuitive awareness of moral truths, although sometimes these differ from culture to culture. Francesca Ricci. Theology Essay (Ethics) 21st October, 2003. Meta- Ethics. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. “Without real freedom there would be no ethical decisions to make,” Discuss.

    No matter how much the events around us may be pre determined the human mind still has the capability of acting in a completely unpredictable manner without any specific cause being suggested for actions. Soft determinism is the third deterministic standpoint and one where determinism and free will are completely compatible.

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    It is possible to test these propositions: For example 'aliens have just landed in London' is a synthetic proposition, because we could prove this statement by going to London and seeing the aliens with our own eyes. Therefore, we can say that 'a posteriori' propositions are scientifically or empirically testable.

  1. Outline the general ethical responsibilities on helping relationships and discuss them with examples from ...

    This will be accepted within the principles of utilitarianism that although, initially Mark would likely be upset, morally, the end result would be aimed at prolonging the lives of others involved. It should be made clear to him that the sooner the issue is disclosed the better the chances for prolonging the lives of those involved.

  2. Moral and Ethical Views on Forest Fires

    Arguably speaking, it is agreeable that the taxes may become too high, but it would be for the sake of their own country - for the sake of not only the people, but also the land, and themselves. However, ethically, they should be willing to pay more.

  1. Explain why there maybe problems about the meaning of ethical language

    The teleological approach states that the moral action is the one that aims to fulfil the purpose of the agent. However, the teleological approach can assess how moral an action is on how well it achieves particular ends. Whereas the deontological approach believes that true morality is derived from a

  2. How are religious and ethical principles used in the abortion debate?

    Those who are rational and faithful would find five primary precepts; basic moral commands which God has embedded in nature: to preserve life, reproduce, educate, live in society, and worship God. The first of these to protect and preserve human life, is widely used to argue that killing is intrinsically

  1. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    There are many different theories that support that there is a point in the pregnancy when we become human, however there is no medical evidence of this. The foetus remains a human throughout the pregnancy; it just goes through different stages of development.

  2. Does the "War on Terror" mean the just war doctrine is dead?

    The Bush administration has never been able to provide certainty of any grave threats to the Untied States by the Iraqi regime, nor a situation of an impending attack. Although a military response by the United States against al Qaeda after the September 11 attack can be justified as just

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work