• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than expression of opinions.

Extracts from this document...


Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than expression of opinions. (33) Before this question can be answered, terms such as meta- ethics and theories associated with this topic must be explained to ensure that all the terms are understood in the correct way. Meta- Ethics explores the meaning and function of moral language. Instead of looking at whether abortion is right or wrong, meta- ethics looks at methods to use and how to approach the issue. Meta- ethics is important because if there is 'no agreement about the meaning of ethical language (some argue that it has no real meaning at all), then ethical debate is pointless and will never achieve anything.'(1) Meta- ethics looks at questions like, What, if anything, do we mean when we use words such as 'good' or 'bad, 'right' or 'wrong?' When we use these words, what are we doing? Are we expressing our approval? And do we all mean the same when we say something is good? This is harder to answer than it first appears. A meta- ethical theory, unlike a normative ethical theory, does not contain any ethical evaluations. Some of the approaches used are divided into cognitivist and non- cognitivist views. Cognitivist views hold the opinion that moral statements are about facts, things that are true or false. ...read more.


(6) Moral Skepticism: holds the view that ethical statements are generally false. 'We can not sufficiently justify any ethical claims, and therefore maintain doubt about whether they are true or false.' (5) So when scholars say ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinions they could be correct, but at the same time they could be erroneous. Moral subjectivism would back up the claim that ethical statements are expressions of opinion because subjectivism states that things are true or false dependant upon the individual. So if person X thinks abortion is wrong, then that's their opinion, and if person Y thinks abortion is justifiable, then it's their opinion so it is also correct. So therefore, ethical statements are opinions based upon the individual and therefore, opinions would differ from place to place. On the other hand, ethical naturalism says that it is possible to establish moral facts, so therefore, ethical statements must be more than opinions otherwise it would not be possible to determine this. Naturalism is well presented in the works of Mill. G.E.Moore argues that 'ethical naturalism makes a mistake, and that moral statements cannot be verified simply by looking at the evidence available.' (1) This mistake is known as the 'Naturalistic Fallacy.' Non- cognitivism (emotivism) ...read more.


If not, then ethical statements could be like expressions of feelings, as everyone's would be different. Moore believed that it is still possible for us to decide whether moral statement is true or false, even if we cannot use our powers of observation to give us the answers. According to Moore, we cannot use our five senses to determine whether something's right or wrong, but use our 'moral intuition.' 'There is no way that we can explain yellow, especially to someone who has never seen it, and if we try to say what it is like, we end up giving examples of yellow things rather than defining yellow itself; but we still know what's yellow when we see it.' (1) It could be said that it is just not a matter of opinion, but something that we can be certain about. In conclusion, I think ethical statements are more than just matters of opinion and I think certain theories within this, for example emotivism, takes away the value ethical statements should bare. Although certain theories like intuitionism have some truth, it is hard to pin point the 'exact truth' as there are so many different opinions and theories to consider. Therefore, it could be considered ethical statements are mere expressions of opinion, but as intuitionism says, there are objective moral principles and we have an intuitive awareness of moral truths, although sometimes these differ from culture to culture. Francesca Ricci. Theology Essay (Ethics) 21st October, 2003. Meta- Ethics. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain why there maybe problems about the meaning of ethical language

    Logical positivists hold moral statement to be meaningless, unless they are what they termed; analytic or synthetic statements. Basically, an analytic statement is one which is correct by definition, for example the statement; all parents have produced children is an analytic statement because to be a parent you must have produced a child or children.

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    And if genes are linked to identity, does the child lose the possibility of being truly unique? James Q. Wilson's article "The Paradox of Cloning" discusses many of the issues brought to light by Kass. However, Wilson believes that a total ban on cloning would be hasty.

  1. "All ethical statements are relative." By examining the justifications for-and implications of- making this ...

    At 18 years old, many children leave their homes. The goal of many American parents is to prepare their kids to leave the house at 18 years of age. This detachment continues in their adult lives, as every move they make is seen as a personal advancement towards materialistic goals.

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    It is possible to test these propositions: For example 'aliens have just landed in London' is a synthetic proposition, because we could prove this statement by going to London and seeing the aliens with our own eyes. Therefore, we can say that 'a posteriori' propositions are scientifically or empirically testable.

  1. Emotivism - Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no ...

    Stevenson was interested in observing how people use moral terms in everyday conversation. He analyses that general agreements or disagreements occur within them. He also steers to the fact that moral terms either make you attracted to them or repel them and also the fact that you cannot apply analytic or synthetic methods of verification to ethical language.

  2. To what extent should our emotions be considered an important aspect of our ethical ...

    But let them be examined with a magnifying glass. Where is their beauty?"1 We can also say, that it is aesthetically true that the sun plunges into the sea, but it is false logically and objectively. But to what degree it is necessary to combine logical truth with emotions the

  1. How are religious and ethical principles used in the abortion debate?

    This belief that human life is valuable for its own sense and not as a means for something else is a stance advocated by hugely influential philosopher Immanuel Kant, who argues that people and foetuses have intrinsic value and not instrumental value - they cannot be disposed of for the benefit of others.

  2. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    The presence of a unique human DNA code is scientific evidence that this early stage is the start of a human life. Another possible moment when personhood begins is viability, the point at which the foetus can survive outside the womb.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work