• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why there maybe problems about the meaning of ethical language

Extracts from this document...


Explain why there maybe problems about the meaning of ethical language. (12) Discuss possible solutions to these problems. (8) Ethical language uses words, terms and phrases from normal language, but they normally do not have the same meaning. Words such as; 'good' have a variety of meanings in the normal everyday use, but also have several different meanings when used in moral philosophy. For example, the dictionary gives the following definitions of the word good; 'having the right or desired qualities, satisfactory, adequate, efficient, competent, reliable, strong, kind, benevolent, morally excellent, virtuous, charitable, well-behaved, enjoyable, agreeable, thorough, considerable.' Then 'good' can be used to mean the following in moral philosophy; an inherent quality which is widely beneficial, the opposite of bad or evil, something one or more persons approves of, useful in that the good action/concept/attitude enriches human life, or God-like or what God wants. The same problem applies to many other words within the English language, however is best illustrated by the word 'good'. ...read more.


For example, if a woman desperately wanted children but this was impossible except through fertility treatment, many would say that she ought to be offered fertility treatment. In this case the 'is' statement is; a marries woman wants a child, and the 'ought' statement is; she should be offered IVF. G E Moore would argue that the 'ought' statement does not logically follow from the 'is' statement, but there has to be an intermediate statement, however this would also be an 'ought; statement. JR Searle, argues that you can move from an 'is' to an 'ought', his argument is as follows; Jones says, 'I promise to pay you $5 Smith, Jones has, therefore, offered to pay Smith $5, Jones has voluntarily put himself under obligation to pay Smith the money, Jones is, therefore, under obligation to pay, Jones ought to pay Smith $5. In this argument the first four statements are all 'is' statements, and the last is an 'ought' statement. ...read more.


Moreover, there is the Naturalistic Fallacy, which is the is-ought debate; whether it is possible to move from an 'is' statement to an 'ought' statement. Furthermore, according to some people some ethical statements are 'meaningless', it could be argued that this is because of the ethical language used. The only possible solution to there being room for misinterpretation of words because they have many different meanings, is to create new words which have there own specific definition which is agreed on by all. Or just to have agreed on definitions of all words used in ethical language such as 'good', however this is not likely to work. The problem of the naturalistic Fallacy for ethical language cannot be readily solved, the only possibility is, in my opinion, for it to be accepted by all moral philosophers that you cannot move form an 'is' to an 'ought'. The same applies for the 'meaningless' statements, I agree with the logical positivists and see statements which cannot be verified in any way as 'meaningless'. Thomas Taylor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Religious Language cannot be proved, therefore it is meaningless

    individuals and communities, if a statement about God is understood to be true within a form of life then it should be seen as true, whether or not it corresponds with the state of affairs is irrelevant. Consequently when an anti-realists says a statement such as 'god exists' this means

  2. Outline the general ethical responsibilities on helping relationships and discuss them with examples from ...

    * Anti discriminatory practice - personal beliefs should not pose a threat to the quality of care administered to the patient or client * Contracts - This mainly applies to counselling were the counsellor or therapist needs to set terms and conditions on which counselling is offered, and this should be made clear to clients before the counselling sessions commences.

  1. The 21st century has raised more problems for equality than it has solved. Examine ...

    The Western culture has progressively legalised private homosexual acts between consenting adults. In the United Kingdom, the Sexual Offences Act 1967 decriminalised private sexual acts between men 21 years and over in England and Wales. In these same countries, consent to buggery and certain other homosexual acts was then reduced to 16, in the year 2001.

  2. Analyse the arguments which philosophers use to claim that ethical language is not meaningful ...

    Ayer demonstrated that verification of ethical statements is impossible and therefore ethical language is meaningless. Analytically, it is impossible to verify a statement such as 'abortion is wrong' because there is no logical connection between abortion and wrong. Whereas it is contradictory to say 'all bachelors are unmarried women,' it is not contradictory to say 'abortion is not right.'

  1. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    kidney transplant, but is equivalent in value to an organ (related to health and the body, rather than money), and would be a great attraction to many people who suffer from poor eyesight. Of course, a limitation of this argument would be that not everybody would benefit from laser eye

  2. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    Determinists state that people believe they are free only because they're ignorant of the causes of their actions. They make that point when they say that we are deceived in thinking ourselves free, a belief that consists of the causes by which they are determined.

  1. Discuss the claim that ethical and religious language is meaningless.

    Philosophers such as A.J. Ayer, writing in Language, Truth and Logic and members of the Vienna Circle, wanted to be able to break down language into its simplest components. All meaningful propositions were divided into two categories, analytic and synthetic.

  2. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    This reflective distance from our impulses makes it necessary and possible to desire which one we will act on. The reflective mind demands reason for it to endorse and therefore act on such presented desire. It forces the reflective self to act for reasons. When an impulse (i.e. moral desire)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work