• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explore the view that morality without religious belief is impossible

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explore the view that morality without religious belief is impossible (15) Many would agree with the statement that morality without religious belief is impossible, because religions provide an unchanging moral code whereas secular morality varies depending on society and culture. Documents such as the Decalogue transcend time, but constitutions and laws of man are constantly being amended and reviewed. Morality without God is merely subjective; two people will have different ideas on what is to be considered moral. This will only lead to confusion. ...read more.


Correspondingly, some of the most notorious criminals such as Hitler and Stalin were staunch atheists - this is not to say that all atheists are on the level of these men, but it is evident that when a society attempts to crush religion rampant immorality will soon follow. You cannot look to a leader of a country for your morals because they are fallible humans just like you. You need a perfect standard to look up to: God. Atheists lack this perfect standard to base their morality off. ...read more.


This suggests that an adult?s morality could owe more to upbringing than religious understanding; this would explain why standards of morality vary between people. Moreover, religions have been known to cause vast immorality. An early example of this would be the Crusades, when Christians butchered Muslims in the name of religion. A more modern example would be the rise of Islamic extremism, causing incidents such as 9/11 and the 7/7 bombings. If religions are supposed to inspire morality, why do they cause so much harm and bloodshed? Finally, morality can be achieved through legal means. Human laws prevent us from harming ourselves or others through our actions. An atheist can follow these laws and be a good person without religious beliefs. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    Libertarians find it very difficult to argue with the laws of physics and the laws of randomness be it physical randomness such as natural disasters or human randomness such as mental illness or the effects of dictators who impose their "values" on a victimised society, for example Hitler.

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    This is the only legitimate reason for humanitarian intervention, according to prescriptive realism. Functional realism is of the opinion that the state should only pursue its national interest. If each state did this, it would produce the best consequences globally.

  1. Consider the view that humans have no free will.

    unless circumstances claim otherwise (referring back to the drugs and alcohol), these people are called Libertarians. Finally there are those who maintain that some human actions are determined, but that we still have moral responsibility, they are the Soft Determinists, also known as the "Compatibilism" view or "the middle way" between the two extremes.

  2. Anaylse of the critiques of Religion and Morality.

    However, Dawkins adds that religion acts as a 'memetic virus'; this meaning, as with a virus, it may not be completely be beneficial, but simply has a higher success rate in replicating. This characterized as the result of faith, which is defines as 'blind trust, in the absence of evidence,

  1. Religion and Morality

    from God is an autonomous belief, and there are many arguments in compliance with Autonomy, very much to do with the idea of free-will. If we really are to act with personal freedom of choice then we cannot act out of fear of God's punishment, it totally voids the notion

  2. The arguments for and against the view that morality is dependant on religion, and ...

    continuing the species through reproduction, educating children and living in a society which worships God. Therefore acts such as masturbation, adultery and truancy are morally wrong. God's authority commands what is wrong and right. Kant declared that to act morally is to do ones duty, and one's duty is to obey moral law.

  1. Discuss critically the belief that conscience is the voice of God.

    in men by which they distinguish between approval and disapproval of their own actions... this principle in man... is conscience' and that humans are influenced by two basic principles; self-love and benevolence. He believed conscience determines and judges the rightness and wrongness of actions without introspection; 'had it strength as

  2. Examine the key ideas of one critique of the link between religion and morality. ...

    This therefore counters the claim that God?s will is arbitrary as she argues that God can only command things of humanity which are reflective of his own virtues, such as charity. Although some may criticise the deontological aspect of God?s instructions, as they view the arbitrary nature and eschatological reward

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work