• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explore the view that morality without religious belief is impossible

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explore the view that morality without religious belief is impossible (15) Many would agree with the statement that morality without religious belief is impossible, because religions provide an unchanging moral code whereas secular morality varies depending on society and culture. Documents such as the Decalogue transcend time, but constitutions and laws of man are constantly being amended and reviewed. Morality without God is merely subjective; two people will have different ideas on what is to be considered moral. This will only lead to confusion. ...read more.


Correspondingly, some of the most notorious criminals such as Hitler and Stalin were staunch atheists - this is not to say that all atheists are on the level of these men, but it is evident that when a society attempts to crush religion rampant immorality will soon follow. You cannot look to a leader of a country for your morals because they are fallible humans just like you. You need a perfect standard to look up to: God. Atheists lack this perfect standard to base their morality off. ...read more.


This suggests that an adult?s morality could owe more to upbringing than religious understanding; this would explain why standards of morality vary between people. Moreover, religions have been known to cause vast immorality. An early example of this would be the Crusades, when Christians butchered Muslims in the name of religion. A more modern example would be the rise of Islamic extremism, causing incidents such as 9/11 and the 7/7 bombings. If religions are supposed to inspire morality, why do they cause so much harm and bloodshed? Finally, morality can be achieved through legal means. Human laws prevent us from harming ourselves or others through our actions. An atheist can follow these laws and be a good person without religious beliefs. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    Libertarians would disagree with the statement "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill" because they believe we have the freedom to act and have moral responsibility. We are free to make our own choices and decisions.

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    This reverts back to Hobbes' social contract tradition. Hobbes believed that, in order to gain security, each person agrees with others to obey the state, provided others enter into such a contract as well. Hence the state is authorised to pursue the interests of its citizens, but not the interests of citizens of other states.

  1. Consider the view that humans have no free will.

    unless circumstances claim otherwise (referring back to the drugs and alcohol), these people are called Libertarians. Finally there are those who maintain that some human actions are determined, but that we still have moral responsibility, they are the Soft Determinists, also known as the "Compatibilism" view or "the middle way" between the two extremes.

  2. Anaylse of the critiques of Religion and Morality.

    However, Dawkins adds that religion acts as a 'memetic virus'; this meaning, as with a virus, it may not be completely be beneficial, but simply has a higher success rate in replicating. This characterized as the result of faith, which is defines as 'blind trust, in the absence of evidence,

  1. The arguments for and against the view that morality is dependant on religion, and ...

    presence of God calls for the amount of moral actions we can take to reach him.

  2. Discuss critically the belief that conscience is the voice of God.

    in men by which they distinguish between approval and disapproval of their own actions... this principle in man... is conscience' and that humans are influenced by two basic principles; self-love and benevolence. He believed conscience determines and judges the rightness and wrongness of actions without introspection; 'had it strength as

  1. Religion and Morality

    the belief in the existence of an afterlife gives us incentive to live a moral life, which we otherwise may not be able to force ourselves to do. The presence of such an afterlife, and the fear of punishment make it rational (According to William Craig)

  2. Examine the key ideas of one critique of the link between religion and morality. ...

    However, the Old Testament is open to interpretation and has been written by man, there may be errors and there is no means of verifying every story. On the one hand, there are documents in the Bible that contain profoundly sophisticated morals from the Decalogue, while on the other hand there are texts discussing self interested tribalism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work