• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

For what reasons may situation ethics be regarded as a useful ethical theory?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

For what reasons may situation ethics be regarded as a useful ethical theory? An Anglican theologian Joseph Fletcher developed situation Ethics. Legalism is the idea that there are fixed moral laws which are to be obeyed at all times. Antinomianism is the idea that there are no fixed moral principles but that one acts morally spontaneously. Fletcher rejects Legalism because it cannot accommodate 'exceptions to the rule'. If you reject one aspect of the law you surely reject it all. He also rejects Antinomianism on the basis of existentialist ethics which argues that reality is composed of singular events and moments in time. In advocating a situationist ethic Fletcher argued that it is not the 'primary precept' which is the bedrock for the 'secondary precept' but quite the reverse. It is in fact the individual and the situation that is the most important thing as it is the application of an ethical principle that makes an action good or evil. Within each context it is not the overriding 'primary precept' that is to be followed, but instead the law of love 'to do whatever is the most loving thing'. ...read more.

Middle

Its advocates would also claim that situation ethics focuses on humans rather than what amounts to a worship of laws and abstract principles. These only have ultimate value to the extent that they help people. The argument is that the only basis for something being morally good can be the resultant feelings of human beings, and situationalists like Joseph Fletcher have argued that because Christianity's God is a personal one, its moral approach should be centred around human beings too. This allows us to make more personal decisions on actions to be taken because you can choose to do the most loving thing in your opinion. Outline the main weaknesses of situation ethics. To what extent do these undermine the theory? Situation Ethics has been criticised in a number of ways. For example, in order to 'do the most loving thing' in every situation one must look to the long-term consequences of one's actions in the present moment. We do not know if our actions will lead to heartache or joy but the promotion of love for the Situationist requires us to do so if we are to avoid acting selfishly as we cannot always tell what the results of our actions shall be e.g. ...read more.

Conclusion

The definition of love can't be too narrow, or else a number of actions, which would properly be described as loving, will not qualify. It is often very hard for someone to individually judge what is "loving", as they are bound to see things from their perspective. A strong argument against is the fact love is de-valued with this argument, situation ethics is fundamentally vague, resting on a very indefinite definition of love, and could in practice be used to justify anything. It takes relativism in the sense of opposing an excess of absolute rules to the extreme of relativism in the sense of 'anything goes, so long as the motive can be described as "loving".' If the basis of right and wrong is the way actions affect human beings - as situation ethics agrees - then surely we should just consider their consequences, and not some conception of how loving the person in question's motives were. I believe that with all these weaknesses it leaves the theory very weak as it can be used to justify anything as it is forcing you to think from quite a selfish point of view. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the main ethical principle of Christianity.

    The final framework of Christian ethics is situation ethics. Situation ethics, popularised in the 60s by J. Fletcher, stated that there was only one rule or absolute; agape love.

  2. What are the Main Features of Utilitarianism as an Ethical Theory?

    doing so, in theory, abandoning the utilitarianism criteria and in doing so are also using other ways of deciding. The next question that we have to ask ourselves is, 'Is happiness quantifiable'. Is it sensible to believe that actions can be changed into a mathematical formula that measures their respective

  1. Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

    Either choice is unsatisfactory, and they seem at least in conflict, if not mutually exclusive. Unfortunately, the weakness in butler's theory is also one of his greatest credits. The divorce of the supremacy of conscience from divine authority is valiant but ultimately flawed.

  2. Examine the key features of situation ethics, and the main criticisms of it, and ...

    Michael Schofield, saying that they wanted to reassess where Christian moral truth lay. The report was conducted in 1965, and concluded that in the 1960's young people were exposed to these factors; "greater independence; more money in their pockets and purses; the weakening of family bonds and religious influences; the

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    Even success and happiness are not in themselves good, honour can lead to pride, happiness without good will is underserved good luck. A key for Kant is autonomy. If my intention is right, then I will not act at the whim of my sense, but with autonomy.

  2. The Ethics of Stealing

    The rightness or wrongfulness of an act is determined by its ?utility? or usefulness. In this case a Utilitarianist would feel that the ?utility? of the act would make it right.

  1. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    However if it has a selfish or wrong intention then the action is not justifiable. He believed that all humans should act selflessly and virtuously in order to flourish and live a moral life. For example; giving to charity should not have a bad intention such as to seek attention.

  2. How are religious and ethical principles used in the abortion debate?

    comparison of being alive to being dead: 'Death is not an event in life: we do not live to experience death.' Glover's views may seem extremely controversial, but it is reasonable to question what it is about life which is regarded as valuable, rather than singularly regarding all human life as sacred, as the religious treatment of the principle does.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work