• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Give an account of Kant's ethics

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A.) Give an account of Kant's ethics Kantian ethics is a deontological and objective theory of ethics. It is the belief that one may understand what is right and wrong based on reason, and that one should do the right actions because it is the right thing to do. If something is wrong in one situation, it is wrong in any situation regardless of what the consequence might be. Kantian ethics is also based on the idea of one's duty and to obey moral law which is freely self-imposed on one's self by a mere awareness to moral obligations rather than it being imposed on by others. According to Kant one should not behave out of any inclinations or love and compassion. ...read more.

Middle

One dilemma that occurs with this idea is if a murderer is after a friend who is hiding in one's house, upon question of one's where a bout's is it permissible to lie? Kant's answer to this would be not to lie as lying breaks one's moral duty and one's duty is the highest possible good that exists and therefore it seems that it does not make sense to lie. Kantian ethics also states that duty and reason should control one's emotions rather than it being the other way around. The categorical imperative assists one to know which acts are prohibited and which are compulsory. The categorical imperative tells one what should be done. They are categorical because they are prescriptive and awareness is a reason for doing something and therefore moral statements are categorical as they prescribe behaviour and ignoring the outcome. ...read more.

Conclusion

R.M Hare describes how to test a rule by understanding the consequences on affected individuals, then to imagine yourself in the position of others and finally to ask if the rule should be followed for everyone involved in the situation. The treatment towards humans that is considered to be acceptable is unique as humans are the highest forms of creation. Such treatment includes every individual developing intellectually, morally and physically. Humans must also seek happiness upon each other evenly rather than giving someone more happiness and joy whilst another becomes sad or takes away one's freedom. The third principle of the categorical imperative states that all humans must treat each other as ends meaning that humans must treat themselves for the sake of others and not to use others for your own intentional benefit therefore certain rules can not be created such as lying to others because they do to you because everyone would become unbearable within society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

The essay presents most of the key points concerning the nature of Kant's moral philosophy. A lack of clarity means that many of these statements are very confused though and while they include the sort of words you'd expect to hear, the arbitrariness of the order makes it difficult to tell whether the student really know what they are saying. The discussion of the categorical imperative is particularly poor, as little understanding is shown of its three formulations.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Situation ethics

    3 star(s)

    Sometimes people think of love and justice and opposites and Brunner held the opinion that 'love must be between two people whereas justice exists in a group of people.' Fletcher uses this statement to back up his idea that Justice is love working out its problems.

  2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the teleological, deontological and hybrid systems of ethics ...

    This can be seen as a strength, as the this system has clear simple rules to guide us, one can make quick decisions easily in a medical situation in this century, which could save vital time in saving someone's life.

  1. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    Human beings also possess (in addition to the rest) a rational soul that permits representation and thought. Notice that each living thing has just one soul, the actions of which exhibit some degree of nutritive, sensitive, and/or rational functioning. This soul is the formal, efficient, and final cause of the

  2. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    Hence Mill argued that public opinion should not be a law that everyone should conform to, and that the individual should have protection of the law against the prevailing sentiments of society. - Essentially, we each need freedom to develop our individuality.

  1. Plato's Theory of Forms.

    This eternal world is more real than the world we experience through the senses (or Empirical knowledge - knowledge based on our senses), and it is the object of knowledge, pure knowledge, not opinion. Before Plato came up with this theory, philosophers before him, namely Heraclitus, viewed the world of as a subject of constant change.

  2. Explain and evaluate the role of conscience in moral decision-making

    However convincing yourself that a wrong action is right is more evil than the action which results from it. John Henry Newman also took Conscience from a view point and took an intuitionists approach to conscience. This meant that the mind is able to percieve abstract concepts of truths normally thought to beyond empirical evidence.

  1. Do humans have innate knowledge?

    He further argued this point using his wax argument. If a person was presented was presented with solid wax and watched it melt into liquid form, unless they watched the transformation the person would not be able to make the connection between the solid and the liquid wax form, they

  2. Explain Kants Categorical Imperative (25 marks)

    However, if you try to make a universal law of the maxim ?I may always break my promises when it is for my benefit?, it does not work. This is because if everyone made false promises, the institution of promising would be pointless, a promise would be seen as worthless.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work