• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Give an account of Kant's ethics

Extracts from this document...


A.) Give an account of Kant's ethics Kantian ethics is a deontological and objective theory of ethics. It is the belief that one may understand what is right and wrong based on reason, and that one should do the right actions because it is the right thing to do. If something is wrong in one situation, it is wrong in any situation regardless of what the consequence might be. Kantian ethics is also based on the idea of one's duty and to obey moral law which is freely self-imposed on one's self by a mere awareness to moral obligations rather than it being imposed on by others. According to Kant one should not behave out of any inclinations or love and compassion. ...read more.


One dilemma that occurs with this idea is if a murderer is after a friend who is hiding in one's house, upon question of one's where a bout's is it permissible to lie? Kant's answer to this would be not to lie as lying breaks one's moral duty and one's duty is the highest possible good that exists and therefore it seems that it does not make sense to lie. Kantian ethics also states that duty and reason should control one's emotions rather than it being the other way around. The categorical imperative assists one to know which acts are prohibited and which are compulsory. The categorical imperative tells one what should be done. They are categorical because they are prescriptive and awareness is a reason for doing something and therefore moral statements are categorical as they prescribe behaviour and ignoring the outcome. ...read more.


R.M Hare describes how to test a rule by understanding the consequences on affected individuals, then to imagine yourself in the position of others and finally to ask if the rule should be followed for everyone involved in the situation. The treatment towards humans that is considered to be acceptable is unique as humans are the highest forms of creation. Such treatment includes every individual developing intellectually, morally and physically. Humans must also seek happiness upon each other evenly rather than giving someone more happiness and joy whilst another becomes sad or takes away one's freedom. The third principle of the categorical imperative states that all humans must treat each other as ends meaning that humans must treat themselves for the sake of others and not to use others for your own intentional benefit therefore certain rules can not be created such as lying to others because they do to you because everyone would become unbearable within society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)


The essay presents most of the key points concerning the nature of Kant's moral philosophy. A lack of clarity means that many of these statements are very confused though and while they include the sort of words you'd expect to hear, the arbitrariness of the order makes it difficult to tell whether the student really know what they are saying. The discussion of the categorical imperative is particularly poor, as little understanding is shown of its three formulations.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Situation ethics

    3 star(s)

    Sometimes people think of love and justice and opposites and Brunner held the opinion that 'love must be between two people whereas justice exists in a group of people.' Fletcher uses this statement to back up his idea that Justice is love working out its problems.

  2. "All Religious Language is meaningless"

    It would seem if one takes these conclusions then religious language is indeed meaningless. However both of these theories eventually fall, the claim, that religious language is meaningless again is unfounded, both theories misunderstand the nature of religious language.

  1. Assess the claim that we can have synthetic a priori knowledge

    A rationalist might argue that this is not true, how could you have the idea of a unicorn when it is a mythical creature? You can still have the idea of it without experiencing it. This would agree with the argument that there is synthetic a priori knowledge.

  2. How fair is the claim that religious language is meaningless?

    true or false, there is no way that we can test if the statement is true in this world, thefore according to the Verification Principle that statement is meaningless.

  1. Explain the difference between Act and rule utilitarianism

    such as emotions, imagination and intellectual pursuits etc, and lower pleasures are bodily things such as food, intercourse, drugs and drink etc, and it is better to seek higher pleasure than lower pleasure, so from this Mill said we can evaluate a situation and experiences should tell a person that

  2. Explain the strengths of natural law

    It takes the view that there are common rules that apply to all people in all communities and there for is easy to follow as a rule is a rule and should not be broken. This is very strong strength of natural law and gives a good approach to ethics.

  1. Critically assess the claim that the conscience is the voice of reason (35)

    in society, and the voice of our parents prescribing their beliefs onto their children, therefore Fromm, Piaget ad Kohlberg disagree with the statement. Rather than parents and authority figures dictating the morals of man, under Piaget and Fromm, Freud argues that the conscience is the product of the mind that

  2. Critically assess with reference to William James the arguments from religious experience.

    are fundamentally identical. In addition, most religions make claims that conflict with each other, for example, Christians claim that Jesus is the Son of God whereas Muslims claim Jesus was simply a prophet who did not die on the cross and Jews reject Jesus? divinity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work