• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Give an account of Kant's ethics

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A.) Give an account of Kant's ethics Kantian ethics is a deontological and objective theory of ethics. It is the belief that one may understand what is right and wrong based on reason, and that one should do the right actions because it is the right thing to do. If something is wrong in one situation, it is wrong in any situation regardless of what the consequence might be. Kantian ethics is also based on the idea of one's duty and to obey moral law which is freely self-imposed on one's self by a mere awareness to moral obligations rather than it being imposed on by others. According to Kant one should not behave out of any inclinations or love and compassion. ...read more.

Middle

One dilemma that occurs with this idea is if a murderer is after a friend who is hiding in one's house, upon question of one's where a bout's is it permissible to lie? Kant's answer to this would be not to lie as lying breaks one's moral duty and one's duty is the highest possible good that exists and therefore it seems that it does not make sense to lie. Kantian ethics also states that duty and reason should control one's emotions rather than it being the other way around. The categorical imperative assists one to know which acts are prohibited and which are compulsory. The categorical imperative tells one what should be done. They are categorical because they are prescriptive and awareness is a reason for doing something and therefore moral statements are categorical as they prescribe behaviour and ignoring the outcome. ...read more.

Conclusion

R.M Hare describes how to test a rule by understanding the consequences on affected individuals, then to imagine yourself in the position of others and finally to ask if the rule should be followed for everyone involved in the situation. The treatment towards humans that is considered to be acceptable is unique as humans are the highest forms of creation. Such treatment includes every individual developing intellectually, morally and physically. Humans must also seek happiness upon each other evenly rather than giving someone more happiness and joy whilst another becomes sad or takes away one's freedom. The third principle of the categorical imperative states that all humans must treat each other as ends meaning that humans must treat themselves for the sake of others and not to use others for your own intentional benefit therefore certain rules can not be created such as lying to others because they do to you because everyone would become unbearable within society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

The essay presents most of the key points concerning the nature of Kant's moral philosophy. A lack of clarity means that many of these statements are very confused though and while they include the sort of words you'd expect to hear, the arbitrariness of the order makes it difficult to tell whether the student really know what they are saying. The discussion of the categorical imperative is particularly poor, as little understanding is shown of its three formulations.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Situation ethics

    3 star(s)

    Sometimes people think of love and justice and opposites and Brunner held the opinion that 'love must be between two people whereas justice exists in a group of people.' Fletcher uses this statement to back up his idea that Justice is love working out its problems.

  2. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    Plato made two contributions to the theory of knowledge. One was that knowledge is recollecting what is in your head already, not perceiving new things. The other was his theory of forms. Plato faced two major problems when he came to consider what true knowledge is. A philosophical problem; he has to reconcile the problem of One and the

  1. "All Religious Language is meaningless"

    Ramsay spoke of models and qualifiers, we use human models such as 'good' and qualify them with another word to show they apply differently, such as 'infinitely good'. Yet analogy does not provide a satisfactory way to talk meaningfully about God, it seems to be a compromise between univocal and equivocal language.

  2. falsification principle

    Mitchell also wanted to show that religious statements are meaningful even if they are not straightforwardly verifiable or falsifiable but took a different approach to Swinburne to challenge the falsification principle. He argued that Flew was wrong when he said that people don't allow anything to go against their beliefs

  1. Assess the claim that we can have synthetic a priori knowledge

    Hume would counter with the explanation of we can only have the idea of a unicorn because 'you've experienced a horn and you have experienced a horse'. Considering this, we can say an empiricist would believe that there is no such thing as synthetic a priori knowledge; instead Hume suggests that you have complex ideas.

  2. How fair is the claim that religious language is meaningless?

    make the beginning of the Universe meaningless, this opposes what Flew said. R. B. Brainwaite is another opposition of Flews theory, he argued that religious language can have truth and meaning without always making propositions. Brainwaite stated that symbols for example can still be meaningful to religious language however these

  1. Explain Plato's Form of the Good

    He soon sees, with amazing clarity, objects which he thought he knew before. He sees the sun for what it truly is- the source of all life. For the first time he would understand the truth. He completely disregards the cave and the shadows, and realises that they are not what is real.

  2. Critically assess the claim that the conscience is the voice of reason (35)

    will be influenced by the values of the society they live in. Man?s personality is made from the Super-ego, ego and the id; the super-ego specifically sets moral codes that are given by outside influences. This understanding of the conscience rejects the idea that the conscience is the voice of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work