• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Give an account of Kant's ethics

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A.) Give an account of Kant's ethics Kantian ethics is a deontological and objective theory of ethics. It is the belief that one may understand what is right and wrong based on reason, and that one should do the right actions because it is the right thing to do. If something is wrong in one situation, it is wrong in any situation regardless of what the consequence might be. Kantian ethics is also based on the idea of one's duty and to obey moral law which is freely self-imposed on one's self by a mere awareness to moral obligations rather than it being imposed on by others. According to Kant one should not behave out of any inclinations or love and compassion. ...read more.

Middle

One dilemma that occurs with this idea is if a murderer is after a friend who is hiding in one's house, upon question of one's where a bout's is it permissible to lie? Kant's answer to this would be not to lie as lying breaks one's moral duty and one's duty is the highest possible good that exists and therefore it seems that it does not make sense to lie. Kantian ethics also states that duty and reason should control one's emotions rather than it being the other way around. The categorical imperative assists one to know which acts are prohibited and which are compulsory. The categorical imperative tells one what should be done. They are categorical because they are prescriptive and awareness is a reason for doing something and therefore moral statements are categorical as they prescribe behaviour and ignoring the outcome. ...read more.

Conclusion

R.M Hare describes how to test a rule by understanding the consequences on affected individuals, then to imagine yourself in the position of others and finally to ask if the rule should be followed for everyone involved in the situation. The treatment towards humans that is considered to be acceptable is unique as humans are the highest forms of creation. Such treatment includes every individual developing intellectually, morally and physically. Humans must also seek happiness upon each other evenly rather than giving someone more happiness and joy whilst another becomes sad or takes away one's freedom. The third principle of the categorical imperative states that all humans must treat each other as ends meaning that humans must treat themselves for the sake of others and not to use others for your own intentional benefit therefore certain rules can not be created such as lying to others because they do to you because everyone would become unbearable within society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

The essay presents most of the key points concerning the nature of Kant's moral philosophy. A lack of clarity means that many of these statements are very confused though and while they include the sort of words you'd expect to hear, the arbitrariness of the order makes it difficult to tell whether the student really know what they are saying. The discussion of the categorical imperative is particularly poor, as little understanding is shown of its three formulations.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    The soul, according to Plato is the directing force of the body. According to Aristotle, every animate being is a living thing, which can move itself only because it has a soul. Animals and plants, along with human beings, are more like each other than any of them are like any inanimate object, since each of them has a soul.

  2. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    On the other hand John Hick argued that God talk is eschatologically verifiable. He suggested that religion is not meaningless because its truth is verifiable in principle, thus meeting the conditions of verificationism. Hick said that the truth of god's existence is verifiable in principle if true, but not falsifiable if false, at the end of things.

  1. falsification principle

    The symbols of religious language therefore have a meaning, which can change through time in order to direct us to what they did in the past , and if religious language has meaning then religious statements must therefore be meaningful concreting religious belief.

  2. Analyse the key features of Virtue Ethics and Deontology; to what extent is one ...

    Therefore in conclusion, Kant argued that being moral means that people should freely choose to follow duty for it own sake and for no alternative reason. Both virtue ethics and deontological ethics have there strengths and weaknesses. Since virtue ethics is teleological it allows the person in the situation to

  1. Explain Plato's Theory of Forms

    A material object, such as a basketball, has many properties: roundness, ballness, orangeness, elasticity, etc. These are all put together to make up this individual basketball. A form is just one of these properties, existing by itself apart from space and time.

  2. "All Religious Language is meaningless"

    of its predecessor, where the verification principle states that for an assertion to be meaningful it must be proved. The falsification principle, on the other hand, specifies that the grounds on which it can be un-proved must be established before it is accepted as meaningful.

  1. Analyse paragraphs 11 & 12 of Peter Donovans article 'Can we know God by ...

    One example of this is Thomas Aquinas (1224-74) who stated in his Summa Theologica that knowledge of God could be reached through our human reason, and in particular if we applied reason to the evidence that we see around, that we can reach valuable truths about God.

  2. Critically assess the claim that the conscience is the voice of reason (35)

    in society, and the voice of our parents prescribing their beliefs onto their children, therefore Fromm, Piaget ad Kohlberg disagree with the statement. Rather than parents and authority figures dictating the morals of man, under Piaget and Fromm, Freud argues that the conscience is the product of the mind that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work