• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Give an account of Kant's ethics

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A.) Give an account of Kant's ethics Kantian ethics is a deontological and objective theory of ethics. It is the belief that one may understand what is right and wrong based on reason, and that one should do the right actions because it is the right thing to do. If something is wrong in one situation, it is wrong in any situation regardless of what the consequence might be. Kantian ethics is also based on the idea of one's duty and to obey moral law which is freely self-imposed on one's self by a mere awareness to moral obligations rather than it being imposed on by others. According to Kant one should not behave out of any inclinations or love and compassion. ...read more.

Middle

One dilemma that occurs with this idea is if a murderer is after a friend who is hiding in one's house, upon question of one's where a bout's is it permissible to lie? Kant's answer to this would be not to lie as lying breaks one's moral duty and one's duty is the highest possible good that exists and therefore it seems that it does not make sense to lie. Kantian ethics also states that duty and reason should control one's emotions rather than it being the other way around. The categorical imperative assists one to know which acts are prohibited and which are compulsory. The categorical imperative tells one what should be done. They are categorical because they are prescriptive and awareness is a reason for doing something and therefore moral statements are categorical as they prescribe behaviour and ignoring the outcome. ...read more.

Conclusion

R.M Hare describes how to test a rule by understanding the consequences on affected individuals, then to imagine yourself in the position of others and finally to ask if the rule should be followed for everyone involved in the situation. The treatment towards humans that is considered to be acceptable is unique as humans are the highest forms of creation. Such treatment includes every individual developing intellectually, morally and physically. Humans must also seek happiness upon each other evenly rather than giving someone more happiness and joy whilst another becomes sad or takes away one's freedom. The third principle of the categorical imperative states that all humans must treat each other as ends meaning that humans must treat themselves for the sake of others and not to use others for your own intentional benefit therefore certain rules can not be created such as lying to others because they do to you because everyone would become unbearable within society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

The essay presents most of the key points concerning the nature of Kant's moral philosophy. A lack of clarity means that many of these statements are very confused though and while they include the sort of words you'd expect to hear, the arbitrariness of the order makes it difficult to tell whether the student really know what they are saying. The discussion of the categorical imperative is particularly poor, as little understanding is shown of its three formulations.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how moral decisions should be made according to: Act and Rule utilitarianism

    3 star(s)

    The one of the key benefits of rule utilitarianism is that it solves some of the problems involved when assessing act utilitarianism.

  2. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    Hick himself speaks of the asymmetry of his notion. He shows this in his story of celestial city. Hick imagined 2 travellers on the journey through to the celestial city. The journey is unavoidable. One traveller believes that there is a celestial city at the end of the journey and

  1. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    Plato made two contributions to the theory of knowledge. One was that knowledge is recollecting what is in your head already, not perceiving new things. The other was his theory of forms. Plato faced two major problems when he came to consider what true knowledge is. A philosophical problem; he has to reconcile the problem of One and the

  2. Explain Plato's Theory of Forms

    The most important is good, the ultimate principle. Good illuminates the other forms. The forms flow down form of the Good going from most general, abstract, and objective (the Good)

  1. falsification principle

    Tillich said that religious language communicates religious experience through symbols which 'open up' new levels of reality. He argued this was because symbols go beyond the external world to an 'internal reality', a higher reality which allows us to understand the concepts of God in our level of reality and understanding.

  2. Analyse the key features of Virtue Ethics and Deontology; to what extent is one ...

    look at the consequences of an action, unlike deontological ethics which only allows the person to look at the action.

  1. Analyse paragraphs 11 & 12 of Peter Donovans article 'Can we know God by ...

    Aquinas applied his reason to come to the conclusion that 'some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end'. William Paley went on to use nature to attempt to come to the conclusion that God was creator of the universe, comparing the Earth to a

  2. Critically assess the claim that the conscience is the voice of reason (35)

    Newman?s reasoning to believe that the conscience is the voice of God outweighs the belief that it is purely the voice of reason and consequently disagrees with the beginning statement. To reason and rationalise makes man different from animals and thus one may argue that the conscience is the voice

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work