• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Give an account of the ethical arguments in support of suicide.

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Give an account of the ethical arguments in support of suicide. [35] In a broad sense suicide can be defined as, ?the act of intentionally ending your life.? However, there are many different types of suicide. Durkheim identified four kinds: egoistic suicide, which is the result of feeling one?s life is meaningless; altruistic suicide, the act of giving one?s life for the greater good; anomic suicide, the result of a major social change that disrupts a person?s sense of order; and fatalistic suicide, the results of excessive regulation, when one?s future is pitilessly blocked by oppressive discipline, such as in a prison or dictatorship. ...read more.


Suicide could be justified if one fell victim to severe pain or disease, but otherwise suicide would usually be seen as a rejection of one's social duty. Furthermore, Hume was another writer who believed that suicide could be ethically justified. He wrote, ?a man who retires from life does no harm to society: he only ceases to do good.? David Hume was attempting to refute the idea that suicide was a sin against God. Hume argues that suicide is no more a rebellion against God than is saving the life of someone who would otherwise die, or changing the position of anything in one's surroundings. ...read more.


Freud claimed that we all have a death drive and that our ego may not be able to cope with negative experiences such as guilt and we may self-destruct. In terms of morality, suicide is not an act of free will, and therefore the person that takes their own life cannot be held responsible for their actions. Furthermore, altruistic suicide could be a courageous and selfless act, in line with both utilitarianism and situation ethics. For example, falling on a grenade refers to the deliberate act of using one's body to cover a live time-fused hand grenade, absorbing the explosion and fragmentation in an effort to save the lives of others nearby. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    life expectancy, some complications with the procedure at some point, and have to remain on immunosuppressant drugs for the rest of their lives, so they do go through a significant amount of suffering too. Weighed up against each other from a relativist point of view, the donor does not really

  2. RE euthanasia for and against

    our own choices and we should not have anything 'determined' for us whether it be by destiny or law. AGAINST EUTHANASIA (GENERAL) Some would be blinded by their pain and think for the short term. They could decide that the pain is too great and they would be happier if the moment stopped.

  1. Explain religious and ethical arguments in favour of Euthanasia

    Death is preferable to living a miserable life. The idea of Christian agape is linked to situation ethics as they both promote always doing the most loving thing, which, in the case of a suffering patient, would be to allow euthanasia.

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    Unless one believes that decreased intelligence makes a person less human, sexual reproduction always produces children that are equally human and unique. Kass does not indicate that reproductive biotechnologies are immoral, he simply tries to reinforce the idea that cloning may take something away from the natural process.

  1. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    another is not a bargain, even if it is permissible as in self-defense. But to kill some to save more is agonizing precisely because it is not forbidden by the principle. Most SL proponents in practice are stymied by the question whether one life may be sacrificed to save many.

  2. Compare Mill and Kant's ethical theories; which makes a better societal order?

    were to act, whether you are willing for that rule to be followed by everyone all over. If you are willing to universalize the act, it must be moral; if you are not, then the act is morally impermissible. Kant believed that the welfare of each individual should properly be

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work