• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

God Knows the ethical decisions we will make. Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'God knows the ethical decisions we will make.' Discuss. Although as humans we behave as if we are free, is it possible that our actions are determined by an external force beyond our control? Although it appears that every event has a cause, some believe that only God knows what we will do and when. God is believed to be omniscient and also omnipresent; that nothing can be hidden from God, as he knows our past, present and future. This theory suggests that perhaps human beings are not free, as if God knows what we will do next week then how can we be said to be acting freely? Augustine believed that in this life God has already decided who will achieve salvation and be saved or not saved, and that human has very little understanding of God's purpose and plans for us. Some people would argue that if God had already decided whether we are to be saved or not, our actions and purpose become irrelevant, and this would cause people to lose faith and act immorally, as it would not affect their after-life. ...read more.

Middle

Kant says that moral responsibility is only possible with free will. He argued for the idea of transcendental freedom, freedom that is as a presupposition of the question "what ought I to do?" This is what gives us sufficient basis for ascribing moral responsibility: the rational and self-actualising power of a person, which he calls moral autonomy: "the property the will has of being a law unto itself." Libertarians accept that universal causation would apply to a mechanistic world, but that this would not influence human choice. A kleptomaniac (someone with an irrational urge to steal in the absence of an economic motive) may be inclined to steal, but has the choice not to. There is a difference between the personality and morality. All of our actions are based on the assumption that we are free. We can only make decisions about what to do if we do not already know what we are going to do. ...read more.

Conclusion

Having discussed the three main conflicting theories of determinism and free will, we can see that there is not truth on either end of the line. As stated earlier in the paper, "it is not either black or white." The truth can be found in the soft determinism, as it identifies with reality the most. Throughout history, people have always sought freedom, and hard determinism meanly deprives people their ability to act freely and follow internal call of will. The natural response is obvious. Libertarians on the other hand, claim that people are god-like, omnipotent beings, who are completely free in their choice, but at the same time they cannot explain the causes of a particular decision. Surely, free will is compatible with determinism, and the act of writing this paper is a perfect example. The desire to express my thoughts and to pass the course harmoniously coexist with the necessity to complete the assignment given by the professor. If not, then are people truly that free? Or, is there really a common determinant in the universe? Why then there is no order in universe and in molecules? ?? ?? ?? ?? Daniel Flood TM06 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. We are free to make ethical decisions, discuss

    If this is true we must question our whole ethics as a world. Libertarians argue that determinists straight forward view of the world is wrong, and they are mistaken. Libertarians believe in universal causation and that it can be applied to the world, but they do not accept the view that human choice is affected.

  2. Compare Mill and Kant's ethical theories; which makes a better societal order?

    Aristotle presents multiple arguments as to appropriate moral action (see his son's book of notes, entitled Nicomachean Ethics) on ways to achieve them. I believe however that he falls short when he uses and describes the term, "good." Aristotle maintains that proper moral motivation involves "appropriate desires and emotions in addition to correct judgement."

  1. Consider the view that humans have no free will.

    In ethics there are three philosophical approaches to freedom. There are those who maintain that humans can't be morally blameworthy for their actions because all of their actions are determined, this group of people are called Hard Determinists. Then there are those who maintain that we are free to act and morally responsible at all times throughout our lives,

  2. Free essay

    Hard Determinism Negates Free Will, Discuss

    which suggests that when making a moral decision free will and prior causes both come into effect. This compatiablist idea appears convincing; however as with determinism many would argue that this theory has great weaknesses. For example, it cannot identify the departure point of cause and effect.

  1. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    We contrast this flexible, conscious control that we enjoy with the involuntary action of, say, our heartbeat or digestion, and with the instinctual imperative of a bird's nest-building or a dog's conditioned response. Our decisions are far more independent of nature and nurture than any animals; we are aware of

  2. Hard determinism and the religious approach to ethical living are not compatible"

    Rewards and punishment for moral behaviour makes sense only if the actions were not caused by another. Further Determinism leads to fatalism. If everything is determined beyond our control, then why do good and avoid evil? Indeed, if determinism is right, evil is unavoidable.

  1. Assess the claim that Free Will and Determinism are compatible

    Satre, unlike thinkers such as Aristotle, refused to accept a common human nature which could be the source of morality. Whilst a penknife's essence is pre defined (it should consist of a blade which is able to cut), human beings have no essence to begin with.

  2. A Right Ethical Act Is One Approved By God. Discuss.

    Whatever God commands becomes the standard of moral rightness, and there are no moral standards external to God to limit what he would or would not command. So if God commanded one person to rape another, Devine command theory entails that rape would be moral because ?doing the right thing? is logically equivalent to ?doing what God commands?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work