• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Can the Religious View Be Defended As a Way of Seeing the World?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?How Can the Religious View Be Defended As a Way of Seeing the World?? The philosopher John Wisdom suggested that the divergence between religious believers and non-believers exists as a disagreement between different perspectives of seeing the world. For the believer, the world is seen as God?s creation, while the atheist sees the world as one independent of God. Thus for Wisdom the disagreement isn?t on whether the world exits or not, but simply rather a difference in a way of perceiving the world. Anthony Flew takes Wisdom?s analogy of the invisible gardener and claims that the religious believer isn?t making a genuine hypothesis of the world at all, and that their claims are actually meaningless, because there is no evidence whatsoever that would falsify them. Wittgenstein, for very different reasons, argues that religion is not a hypothesis because he believes that religious claims should not be interpreted as scientific claims. Scientists make hypotheses; believers however, do not. Although, some religious believers might be uncomfortable with this argument because they believe that when the make religious statements, what they are saying are meaningful statements that are genuinely about the world Paley?s design argument also offers support to the claim that the religious view can be defended as a way of seeing the world. ...read more.

Middle

Each time the gardener isn?t found, the believer simply modifies their belief so that it isn?t falsifiable. Flew is essentially arguing that a statement such as ?there is a gardener? can only be meaningful if it is a genuine claim about the world. However, it can only be a genuine claim, if the person producing the statement can consider it being wrong, or to put it simply, falsified. Someone who refuses to renounce their faith, no matter what is discovered about the world, is not talking about the world at all. When shown evidence that their statement isn?t true, they add to or and qualify it so that the new evidence no longer rebuts it. An example would be how Christians used to believe in the creation as being literally 6 days, but now most accommodate scientific advances into their faith as well, almost taking a deistic approach to it. This is due to modern cosmology and evolutionary theory causing doubts on original claims. Therefore, in Flew?s view the religious view cannot be defended as a way of seeing the world because the religious believer essentially ?dies the death of a thousand qualifications?. No matter what proof against the religious view is given to them, the religious believer simply just qualifies the evidence. ...read more.

Conclusion

If we are not immersed in the religious ?form of life?, or if we don?t share those beliefs, or use the concepts in a regular and familiar way, then we will be unable to understand those religious statements. Hence, for Wittgenstein religious views can be seen as a way of seeing the world because the language games which we use to express religious views are a way of expressing things in the world in a religious perspective. In conclusion, the religious view can be defended as a way of seeing the world through a number of ways. Through Paley?s design argument view you can see the world from a religious viewpoint because there are so many indicators in the natural world that indicate to a greater being, and through a religious perspective, this being is God. In addition, as defended similarly by Hare and Mitchell, there are certain beliefs, such as religious views, that we keep no matter what evidence there is against it. Sometimes we may accept the existence of such evidence; however we still keep our faith and perceive the world from a religious perspective. Finally, as shown by Wittgenstein?s language games, religious believers express words from a religious perspective through following the rules of these ?language games?, hence defending the claim that religious views can also be a way of seeing the world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Free essay

    Language game

    Finally language games defend language against criticisms from other 'forms of life', since truth is understood as relative and statements are to be judged against their context and no on whether they are inherently or objectively true or false.

  2. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    David Hume would call into validity the nature of the people who make and verify these claims, stating that either they are religious and seek to prove their beliefs to be true, or are mentally unbalanced and cannot be relied upon to make accurate claims.

  1. The idea of miracles is a major obstacle to faith in the modern world ...

    One does not have to be a fundamentalist evangelical to agree with Paul here, and it is hugely important to many believers who are traditional theists whether miracles could or could not occur, and if one could justify a belief that they did occur.

  2. "Religious Language is meaningless." Discuss.

    They are proportionate. God is also wise, but on a greater scale than both Aristotle and David Beckham. Although Aquinas makes a good point in his Analogy of Proportion, as it is a logical approach and it helps us recognize that God is different to us, it still leaves us asking questions.

  1. How to create a completely peaceful world. To create a fully peaceful world, ...

    Each nation has the nature drive for economic gain, safety and glory. Conflicts between nations are inevitable because of the natural drive. Therefore, war becomes inevitable. Furthermore, the fast growing globalization has changed the world to be a "small village".

  2. Examine the contributions that two of the following may make to a study of ...

    The best supporter of religious language being symbolic is protestant theologian called Tillich his argument was basic and that all religious language was symbolic and can not be taken as literal assertions about the world. Religious words, actions, objects and events can be interpreted symbolically.

  1. Distinguish between atheism and agnosticism. Analyse a critique of religious belief and consider critically ...

    Darwin's theory should be respected and that his ideas are correct, because it is backed up with empirical evidence. Dawkins position on Darwin's argument is not surprising since he is a biologist and therefore he wants empirical evidence before he believes in a theory and Darwin gives evidence evolution.

  2. Critically Assess the Claim That the Religious Believer Dies a Death of a Thousand ...

    Regardless of any evidence shown to the believer, against the gardener, the believer maintains their belief. Each time the gardener isn?t found, the believer simply modifies their belief so that it isn?t falsifiable. Flew is essentially arguing that a statement such as ?there is a gardener? can only be meaningful if it is a genuine claim about the world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work