• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does Kant support God's existence?

Extracts from this document...


(a): How does Kant support God's existence? (10 marks) Immanuel Kant feels that no-one, human or otherwise, can "know" that God exists. This is due to various flaws and necessities for humanity. For one, when we cannot have an a posteriori proof for God's existence due to the fact that it is completely dependent on our personal experience of the world and, therefore, our senses. This is not to be relied upon as we can never see the world for what it really is; only what it appears to us. Kant names the real world, the world we cannot see, the Noumenal World. The world which we perceive through our senses is known to him as the Phenomenal World. The Phenomenal World is the way it is as we cannot help but see the world in a spatio-temporal state of mind, as we are spatio-temporal beings ourselves. ...read more.


This highest good is both moral perfection and perfect happiness. For the Summum Bonum to be achieved, these must both be present, as one cannot be without the other. Morality, a universal concept, demands of us that we must aim for this Summum Bonum. We must all strive to be perfectly good, attain moral perfection and the perfect happiness. However, we cannot possibly achieve this ultimate good. This is due to the fact that we are flawed, weak and contingent beings, prone to mistakes and filled with imperfections. Although we may be able to strive towards virtue in our thought and conduct, we cannot achieve true happiness along with it to ensure perfection. We cannot achieve what we deserve for our efforts because we are not omnipotent. Therefore, we cannot hope to achieve this Summum Bonum. However, in Kant's point of view, "ought implies can". ...read more.


In this argument, there are two major assumptions upon which the argument rests upon. These are that, firstly, there is an absolute moral order within the world. This is shown to us through both the Bible and Church teachings. Another of the major assumptions is that we, humanity as a whole, are responsible to some transcendent self, in our unconsciousness. This means that we do not feel guilt, do to morality, to our superior, equals or inferiors in society. Rather, all our guilt is towards God. We all account towards him. Therefore, although Kant feels that we cannot possibly prove God's existence, he feels that His existence must be a necessary postulate for the world to make sense. He, therefore, doesn't necessarily make sense of God's existence and support it using his moral argument, but, instead, he uses it to make sense of, and support, morality and why it exists. He had no intention of ever arguing towards the existence of God. Instead he vehemently opposed it, using our senses as our drawback in our arguments. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Utopia - The Impossibility of Perfection

    to despise for its complexity and sins, Prospero is bound to leave his contemplative life behind on the mystical Isle. The Commonwealth is, in the end, but a play within a play, a dream within a dream. Though drastically different in their approach and vision of the perfect states, More's Utopia and Shakespeare's Commonwealth share two common fatal flaws.

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    Yet, as has been mentioned, in order to understand Nietzsche's view of morality you must bear in mind his perspectivist views. The reason that the slave sees the master as bad is that the actions of the master have bad consequence for him, the reason that the master sees them as good is that they have good consequences for him.

  1. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    Jesus might be a mortal centaur (half man and half horse), or he might be a bionic man. The claim that he is not just a man does not in itself justify the conclusion that he is not mortal. I have used the above examples not in order to present

  2. The Metamorphosis: Existence.

    (pg 4). Gregor passes time by avoiding his boss, trying to earn enough money so that he can pay back his parents, which he claims will take up to "five or six years" and painlessly avoiding intimate relationships, a side effect he argues comes with the profession.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work