• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far does the Ontological argument provide the existence of God?

Extracts from this document...


How far does the Ontological argument provide the existence of God? 'Ontological' means 'nature of being. It is a branch of metaphysics and set of entities presupposed by a theory. It states that if we understand the meaning of the word God we will realise that God exists, it is in the very nature of God that he should exist. And God wouldn't be God if he didn't exist. ...read more.


This is dissimilar to an 'a posteriori' argument which only gives merely probability unlike an 'a priori' argument, which can be sound and offer reliable proof. It's an argument based on Logic. Logical truths are true by definition. We know they are true independently of experience e.g. We do not need to check that all circle as are round because a circle cannot be anything else but round, it is tur by definition. ...read more.


There are two main principal contributors to the 'classical argument' St Anselm of Canterbury and Rene Descartes. Anselm's defined God as 'a liquid quo nihil maior cogitari possit', which means 'that than nothing greater can be conceived'. Then he says it is better to exist in reality than in the mind alone. Therefore God exists. He also says that even the atheist must have a definition of God, if only to dismiss His existence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    the world, saying that the world was 'a brute fact', that it was 'just there'. He said it was not necessary to describe things as either continent or necessary.64 It was not necessary to postulate any previous cause. The cosmological argument, he thought, did not need to be demolished because it was a pseudo problem, not a real one.

  2. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    the apparent jump from definition, that is to say the imaginary, to what exists in reality; for instance, it can be said an ontological argument for God not existing: To create our world is the most supreme achievement God is the greatest conceivable being To create whilst not existing, is

  1. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    Descartes argument brought with it many criticisms, Gassendi was the first to say that existence was not a property but was something else. He argued that a being without existence would not be imperfect; the being would be nothing as it would not exist.

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Descartes version: Cause must have reality as it's effect, the idea of a perfect being is caused by God. Therefore God exists. However Hume also objects to Descartes cosmological argument for the existence of God by using his theory of causation in his book 'An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding'.

  1. The religious experience argument is the most convincing proof for the existence of God. ...

    We can even see examples from Biblical times as mentioned above with Saul. An argument put forward by Caroline Franks Davies goes on to prove the above statement. She states that if you weigh up all the arguments both for and against the existence of God the scales are balanced.

  2. Give an account of the ontological argument for the existence of God

    He says that by the word God we mean a supremely perfect being. He is a very important person and does not have any flaws. You cannot improve on perfection. For God to lack existence, it would mean that God is lacking perfection and that cannot be the case.

  1. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    Testing the validity (soundness) of deductive arguments If you cannot see plainly that an argument is valid, there is a crucial test which you can apply: deny the conclusion and see if you are then being contradictory in asserting the premises.

  2. Outline the Ontological Argument for the existence of God.

    This means that Descartes believes God to be a supremely perfect being holding all the perfections and explains if the notion of God did not include existence it would not be supremely perfect as it would be lacking a perfection and therefore he argues that this would be unintelligible and according to his nature God must exist.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work