• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far does the Ontological argument provide the existence of God?

Extracts from this document...


How far does the Ontological argument provide the existence of God? 'Ontological' means 'nature of being. It is a branch of metaphysics and set of entities presupposed by a theory. It states that if we understand the meaning of the word God we will realise that God exists, it is in the very nature of God that he should exist. And God wouldn't be God if he didn't exist. ...read more.


This is dissimilar to an 'a posteriori' argument which only gives merely probability unlike an 'a priori' argument, which can be sound and offer reliable proof. It's an argument based on Logic. Logical truths are true by definition. We know they are true independently of experience e.g. We do not need to check that all circle as are round because a circle cannot be anything else but round, it is tur by definition. ...read more.


There are two main principal contributors to the 'classical argument' St Anselm of Canterbury and Rene Descartes. Anselm's defined God as 'a liquid quo nihil maior cogitari possit', which means 'that than nothing greater can be conceived'. Then he says it is better to exist in reality than in the mind alone. Therefore God exists. He also says that even the atheist must have a definition of God, if only to dismiss His existence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    As the text of Way seems to suggest, the second way is concerned with generous casual questions rather than particular ones. In a sense, it is arguing about causality itself.63 Bertrand Russell was simply unimpressed with the argument. He declined even to show interest in an explanation or cause for

  2. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    a cow exists in reality, while the concept of a unicorn has no instances in reality and this again is a powerful argument against the ontological argument being a proof. The second form of the argument tries to prove that God is a necessary being and that he exists necessarily.

  1. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    greater than to create whilst existing Thus, to create our world whilst not existing would be the greatest achievement Therefore, as God is the greatest conceivable being, God must not exist. Obviously, there are many flaws in this argument; for instance, why is it that our world is the greatest

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Movement: A moved by B moved by ............first mover itself unmoved = God Cause: A caused by B caused by ...................first cause itself uncaused = God Existence: always dependent or contingent A is what it is because B is what it is...............first existence is necessary Descartes uses the cosmological argument

  1. The religious experience argument is the most convincing proof for the existence of God. ...

    He stated that we should therefore allow religious experience some credulity unless there is some evidence against them. Both Davies and Swinburne's arguments are inductive. An inductive argument is one in which the premises are supposed to support the conclusion in such a way that if the premises are true, it is improbable that the conclusion would be false.

  2. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    Jesus is not just a man (3) Jesus is not mortal If we posit the opposite conclusion, that Jesus is mortal, are we obliged to reject one of the premises? No, the premises can hold whether the conclusion is true or false.

  1. Give an account of the ontological argument for the existence of God

    He says that by the word God we mean a supremely perfect being. He is a very important person and does not have any flaws. You cannot improve on perfection. For God to lack existence, it would mean that God is lacking perfection and that cannot be the case.

  2. Outline the Ontological Argument for the existence of God.

    Thomas Aquinas also had this criticism suggesting that people do not know the nature of God and therefore cannot conceive, Aquinas adds the ontological argument would only be useful to someone who understands the essence of God and he does not believe any human is capable of such great understanding.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work