• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far must a religious view of life be fatalistic

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How far must a religious view of life be fatalistic? A religious view of life may be fatalistic. Fatalism is the idea that all events all predetermined by fate and are therefore unalterable. Under predestination, a religious view of life may be considered as fatalistic as it?s considered that God has already decided on who will go to heaven, and those who won?t. John Calvin the protestant reformer stated that ?the eternal decree of God, he ordains eternal life for some and eternal damnation for others?. This means that some humans are not free to earn salvation, and not free to earn rewards or punishments. St Augustine states that ?The potter has authority over the clay from the same lump to make one vessel for honour and another one for contempt?. ...read more.


Under omniscience, a religious view of life may be seen as fatalistic. The idea of omniscience is that God is all knowing. As God is all knowing he will know what we are about to do, so how can humans be free to decide our action for ourselves? The solution to this issue may be that although God knows what will happen it is not that God that causes those choices to be made. For example, if God has knowledge that someone will go to school tomorrow, then you will engage in that event without realising it has been pre-planned to happen. Philosopher Thomas Aquinas claims that God does exist outside of time, he does not simply know the future, but he knows everything. ...read more.


No good or bad, no choices, no rewards or punishment. It is all based on our upbringing, through socialisation where we learn the norms and values of the society we live in. Therefore, in different cultures free will is considered to be limited as we all have to follow the strict guidelines set in place. However, humans do have some free will to make their own choices such as Adam and Eve deciding to break god?s command of not eating the forbidden fruit. The consequence of this is that there are punishments if people decide to use their free will if it breaks any legalistic laws. To conclude, I agree that a religious view of life may be fatalistic as it is argued that God knows every action one will take, and we as humans are not aware of this. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    Of course, this helps to illustrate a key difference between power and authority. For example, we all have in us the physical strength to murder (although, obviously, we don't usually have the mental state to want to do it) and this is power in one sense - just like a dictator killing thousands of people because he can.

  2. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    Indeed if the energy is little more than a reflection of what once was, it fails as an argument intended to prove what know is.

  1. An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

    One aspect of Plato's embodied theory concept is the idea that the soul has existed prior the body and therefore had understanding of the world of the forms.

  2. All of our Choices are Predetermined

    For example, if one were to believe in a soul, then it is possible to argue the physical laws of cause and effect have no bearing on our actions. This does seem to contradict fairly obvious observable evidence. Psychology has frequently found causes for human behaviour, and it is difficult

  1. Socrates’ View of Persuasion

    After Gorgias and Polus are forced to concede Socrates' claim, Callicles then argues Socrates to a draw by positing sinisterly that "might makes right." Therefore, according to Callicles, using rhetorical skill to be powerful in the city-state is "right" because the power to do what one wishes is the only reliable criterion for good.

  2. Philosophy: Life After Death Analysis

    lump of raw ore and the other a well-defined, precise piece of machinery capable of performing a function. He held that the distinction between these two is that one has a designer and one does not, the wider implication of this being that the universe's/human being's complexity was evidence of design.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work