• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far must a religious view of life be fatalistic

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far must a religious view of life be fatalistic? A religious view of life may be fatalistic. Fatalism is the idea that all events all predetermined by fate and are therefore unalterable. Under predestination, a religious view of life may be considered as fatalistic as it?s considered that God has already decided on who will go to heaven, and those who won?t. John Calvin the protestant reformer stated that ?the eternal decree of God, he ordains eternal life for some and eternal damnation for others?. This means that some humans are not free to earn salvation, and not free to earn rewards or punishments. St Augustine states that ?The potter has authority over the clay from the same lump to make one vessel for honour and another one for contempt?. ...read more.

Middle

Under omniscience, a religious view of life may be seen as fatalistic. The idea of omniscience is that God is all knowing. As God is all knowing he will know what we are about to do, so how can humans be free to decide our action for ourselves? The solution to this issue may be that although God knows what will happen it is not that God that causes those choices to be made. For example, if God has knowledge that someone will go to school tomorrow, then you will engage in that event without realising it has been pre-planned to happen. Philosopher Thomas Aquinas claims that God does exist outside of time, he does not simply know the future, but he knows everything. ...read more.

Conclusion

No good or bad, no choices, no rewards or punishment. It is all based on our upbringing, through socialisation where we learn the norms and values of the society we live in. Therefore, in different cultures free will is considered to be limited as we all have to follow the strict guidelines set in place. However, humans do have some free will to make their own choices such as Adam and Eve deciding to break god?s command of not eating the forbidden fruit. The consequence of this is that there are punishments if people decide to use their free will if it breaks any legalistic laws. To conclude, I agree that a religious view of life may be fatalistic as it is argued that God knows every action one will take, and we as humans are not aware of this. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. All of our Choices are Predetermined

    This statement would suggest determinism and could only be argued against in two ways: Firstly, we could state that the serial killer has no personality, this however, seems nearly impossible to uphold. Without personality, we would have no preferences and without preferences we could not make any choice at all.

  2. An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

    Contemplation of the higher realities, allows a person's soul to enter eternity after the death of the physical body. This was the basic understanding behind the teachings of Plato, according to which the physical world of sense phenomena (our senses)

  1. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    and Nietzsche's subjectivism would agree. Human nature would be indulged in an ideal world, if happiness was the ultimate value, and this calls for freedom to be a central concept of any Authority. Freedom to vote, to those in the UK, seems to be a basic human right with few restrictions.

  2. Ensayo de teoria de conocimiento

    < Charles H. Duell> Comisionado de EE.UU. de Patentes, en 1899. H, Duell, el hombre que hab�a visto tantas maravillosas invenciones, tantos avances de la ciencia que el p�blico podr�a no saber a�n en 1899, dijo que no quedaba nada por descubrir.

  1. Philosophy: Life After Death Analysis

    This didn't go down too well with theologians of the time, notably William Paley who wrote an entire text against it (including a metaphor which provided Dawkins with the title for a book of his own). Paley's metaphor was one comparing a rock to a watch, one being a purposeless

  2. Socrates&amp;amp;#146; View of Persuasion

    At the end of the Gorgias, the definition of rhetoric seems to balance between Socrates' argument that rhetoric is merely a cosmetic 'knack' that only helps people do wrong and Callicles' equally unsatisfying argument that "rhetoric equals power, and power equals right."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work