How moral a historian is Herodotus?

Authors Avatar

Duncan Spalding

How moral a historian is Herodotus?

        A moral historian is someone, who does not necessarily write their account from a terribly factual point of view, but instead writes in order to get across a point or a set of morals to their readers. Moral historians also tend to believe that there is an objective truth and may give an account in order to highlight a universal moral truth. This type of historian may also choose episodes from history that will illustrate their point, whilst conveniently ignoring those events that tell the opposite.

        Herodotus it would appear tends to fit this description of a moral historian almost seamlessly. Herodotus’ writing is an account of the Persian wars, and its main theme is the heroic and successful struggle of a small and divided Greece against the aggressively expansionist empire of Persia. Herodotus was an Athenian by birth, and it comes as no surprise that his writing had its leanings towards the rest of Greece and Athens in particular and that his account is somewhat biased. However in the case of the Persians, Herodotus constantly throughout his account is attempting to emphasize their arrogance and ‘Hubris’ or lack of respect for the gods.

Join now!

        ‘Having left none of them alive, they stripped the temple of its treasure and burnt everything on the acropolis.’

Herodotus constantly throughout his account gives the impression that the Persians are lacking in religious zeal, and emphasizes their worship and deification of their Kings, whereas the Greeks are largely portrayed as being very religiously conscious and as a result they are supported by the gods.

        ‘You know my lord that amongst living creatures it is the great ones that god smites with his thunder, out of envy of their pride. The little ones do not vex him.’

        Herodotus is also ...

This is a preview of the whole essay