• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Satisfactory is Kant’s Theory of Duty for practical purposes?

Extracts from this document...


How Satisfactory is Kant's Theory of Duty for practical purposes? Undoubtedly Kants ethics have several strong points which logically make sense and make his theory very successful which is why many people have used it when faced with moral decisions on a practical day to day basis. However we need to ask, are these strengths enough for us to use it to make a fair and rational decision in the modern world despite its inevitable weaknesses? To answer this we need to analyse the criticisms as well as the amendments of Kant's ethics more closely and then come to a logical conclusion that takes all of the factors into account. One of the most fundamental factors of deontological ethics is the importance placed on justice. It is in direct opposition to the utilitarian opinion where an innocent person can be punished if it benefits more people on a larger scale. Naturally our human instinct tells us this is wrong and unfair. The morality of an action comes from its intrinsic value and knowledge that it is the right thing to do and therefore our duty to do it not for the maximum happiness received to the largest number of people. ...read more.


For example the maxim 'whenever you are driving a red and yellow sports car you should smile'. This has no morality at all; yet it is universalisable so does this mean I should do it? So how exactly do we know what exactly is the right thing? Kant provides a guide to this with his formula for universalisability however there lies one major flaw within it. He states that all people know what duty requires of us because we are all rational beings, but what he fails to notice is that we 'don't all have the same temperaments or desires and therefore don't find all the same situations intolerable'. For example Hitler saw it as completely acceptable to punish, torture and kill thousands of people and you or I may say this was barbaric and wrong. We also may find ourselves in a situation where the act is right but we would not want it to be done to us (e.g. a punishment we deserve because we have done something wrong). Just because we would not want it to be done to us does not mean it is necessarily wrong. An example is the 'capitalist doctrine of self help' where we accept that life is ruthless and we strive to do the best we can for ourselves. ...read more.


If they were considered lesser than the rest of us because they can not think as rationally as we can, then would Kant allow abortions because they are not technically humans yet? The final flaw Kants ethics has is the fact that life has more to it than morality. Humans naturally look at the consequences of any act without even knowing they are doing it. It is human instinct to look at the results of an act before we decide to do it. In conclusion we can see that Kants deontological ethics has many criticisms as well as good qualities. Practically many would argue that it is a very helpful and useful moral theory because we use it every day in our lives, sometimes without even knowing it. However others argue that it lacks compassion and isn't very realistic for everyday use because we can not help calculating consequences and what are we to do when we have two conflicting duties? However, the practical use of this form of ethics must be a personal choice. We have to weigh up the pros and cons of Kants theory and decide if it would be practical for our personal use in our lives today and if it is, then we should do our best to apply it! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain Kant's ethical theory

    Clearly, if this was a universal principle then there would be no sense in making promises in the first place, therefore Kant would deem this action to be universally wrong.

  2. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    actually want yourself or anyone else to commit suicide, could easily be universalised. Whilst some might feel it is your 'duty' to go to the funeral, even if it is just so that you can comfort your mother, it could lead to your death.

  1. Examine the Strengths and Weaknesses of Kants Ethical Theory

    not to act in this manner.' On the other hand: 'Someone who lives comfortably but contemplates refusing any assistance to people who are struggling under great hardships. The maxim here would be that it is permissible never to help those who are less well-off than ourselves.

  2. Kant's theory of Ethics

    This underpins the Human Rights Act, which suggests that all humans have intrinsic worth simply because of our freedom and rational nature. The third formulation is entitled 'The Formula of the Kingdom of Ends' 'Every rational being must so act as if he were by his maxims in every case

  1. Utilitarianism is unjust

    But why do his values make utilitarianism false? If being inside the experience machine would allow every desire of mine to be filled without my knowing of it being fake, I personally would rather be in the machine. Does that make me wrong to do so? Life is a struggle, it provides much dissatisfaction as well as pleasure as one goes through the course of their lives.

  2. Give an account of Kants theory of ethics.

    The first kind of imperative was known as hypothetical and these prescribed what you should do as a means to an end. Kant said that it is not the consequences of an action that make them right or wrong, but the motives of the person who carries out the action.

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    'Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.' In other words, one's actions become morally good if done with conviction and without the prospect of self-contradiction if everyone else does the same.

  2. Does the "War on Terror" mean the just war doctrine is dead?

    torture or grossly mistreat prisoners in Guantanamo Bay, they are subjecting those treatments to non-combatants and violating the laws of war. The second jus in bello principle advocates for proportionality when conducting military operations, that no non-combatants be put in harms way.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work