• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Satisfactory is Kant’s Theory of Duty for practical purposes?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Satisfactory is Kant's Theory of Duty for practical purposes? Undoubtedly Kants ethics have several strong points which logically make sense and make his theory very successful which is why many people have used it when faced with moral decisions on a practical day to day basis. However we need to ask, are these strengths enough for us to use it to make a fair and rational decision in the modern world despite its inevitable weaknesses? To answer this we need to analyse the criticisms as well as the amendments of Kant's ethics more closely and then come to a logical conclusion that takes all of the factors into account. One of the most fundamental factors of deontological ethics is the importance placed on justice. It is in direct opposition to the utilitarian opinion where an innocent person can be punished if it benefits more people on a larger scale. Naturally our human instinct tells us this is wrong and unfair. The morality of an action comes from its intrinsic value and knowledge that it is the right thing to do and therefore our duty to do it not for the maximum happiness received to the largest number of people. ...read more.

Middle

For example the maxim 'whenever you are driving a red and yellow sports car you should smile'. This has no morality at all; yet it is universalisable so does this mean I should do it? So how exactly do we know what exactly is the right thing? Kant provides a guide to this with his formula for universalisability however there lies one major flaw within it. He states that all people know what duty requires of us because we are all rational beings, but what he fails to notice is that we 'don't all have the same temperaments or desires and therefore don't find all the same situations intolerable'. For example Hitler saw it as completely acceptable to punish, torture and kill thousands of people and you or I may say this was barbaric and wrong. We also may find ourselves in a situation where the act is right but we would not want it to be done to us (e.g. a punishment we deserve because we have done something wrong). Just because we would not want it to be done to us does not mean it is necessarily wrong. An example is the 'capitalist doctrine of self help' where we accept that life is ruthless and we strive to do the best we can for ourselves. ...read more.

Conclusion

If they were considered lesser than the rest of us because they can not think as rationally as we can, then would Kant allow abortions because they are not technically humans yet? The final flaw Kants ethics has is the fact that life has more to it than morality. Humans naturally look at the consequences of any act without even knowing they are doing it. It is human instinct to look at the results of an act before we decide to do it. In conclusion we can see that Kants deontological ethics has many criticisms as well as good qualities. Practically many would argue that it is a very helpful and useful moral theory because we use it every day in our lives, sometimes without even knowing it. However others argue that it lacks compassion and isn't very realistic for everyday use because we can not help calculating consequences and what are we to do when we have two conflicting duties? However, the practical use of this form of ethics must be a personal choice. We have to weigh up the pros and cons of Kants theory and decide if it would be practical for our personal use in our lives today and if it is, then we should do our best to apply it! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain Kant's ethical theory

    Clearly, if this was a universal principle then there would be no sense in making promises in the first place, therefore Kant would deem this action to be universally wrong.

  2. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    'Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end.' Because human beings are rational being, they count equally with one another.

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    Some may even be happy that you told them the truth as straight as you did, and considering it is your own father, distant relatives would be unlikely to question such an action even in their own minds. It might be best to leave out the suicidal tendencies when informing

  2. Compare the Natural Law Theory with Kant's approach in relation to killing in war.

    interest: "..the essence of morality is to be found in the motive from which the act is done alone...A good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes...it is good through its willing alone - that is, good in itself."

  1. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    Two things need to be said. Firstly, it will be obvious that Frank is working from a hypothetical imperative and that Fred is working from a categorical imperative. Secondly, it will be equally obvious that Fred's motive is derived from an autonomous will, whereas Frank's motive is derived from a heteronomous will.

  2. Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality

    and more steadily we reflect on them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me. I do not merely conjecture them and see the as thought obscured in darkness or in the transcendent region beyond my horizon: I see them before me, and I associate them directly with the consciousness of my own existence."

  1. Kant's theory of Ethics

    Kant then explains that however we decide to use the knife it must not be for reasons like increasing our reputation or to gain praise but because it makes sense to conform to a universal law, which asks us 'would we want others to use the knife in the same way we are about to use it?'

  2. Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

    It is therefore our duty to act without selfishness with out any specific goals or aims. We do our duty because it is our duty- not for any other reason. This poses a problem to many philosophers, as the idea is difficult to carry out.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work