• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How valid do you think the teleological argument is as a proof of the existence of God?

Extracts from this document...


Adileh Fard How valid do you think the teleological argument is as a proof of the existence of God? The design argument, sometimes called the teleological argument suggests that the world has a certain order or purpose in its appearance and so its specific structure points to a designer such as God. First of all the most important form of the design argument was put forward by a man called William Paley in his book 'Natural Theology'. Paley put this argument forward in the form of a simple analogy. He said if we were to come across a watch, we would conclude that all the parts fitted together for a purpose, and had not come together by chance. ...read more.


Also Hume argued that if God is all transcendent then the use of an analogy of manufactured objects would imply that it is more usual for a machine to be designed and made by many hands. This would suggest that there were many Gods. However, there are also arguments for the design argument. So we know that the design argument is a posteriori argument - it uses evidence of the world to create theories. Therefore the evidence provided is obvious to humankind because we can understand it and relate to it. This is a very strong point as we know that the world does exist and we know that it is complex for example: the way in which the planets in the solar system rotate, how they obey ...read more.


If the designer was all loving then suffering wouldn't have been included in the design. But some may argue that suffering and evil is due to the free will that humans have. If it wasn't for this free will, everyone would operate like robots and of course the world would be more or less perfect. But we do have free will and therefore we make mistakes in the world and some believe that these mistakes are what make us appreciate life itself. The weight of evidence from for and against arguments seems to be quite equal. There are good arguments for each side but in my opinion I think that the design argument tips the boat. I like the simple ness of the argument, it is easy to understand, makes perfect sense and it proves sufficient enough as an argument as it cannot be disproved by science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The design argument is also known as the teleological argument. The argument looks at ...

    3 star(s)

    Hume also argued that we can only attribute to a cause whatever qualities are needed to produce the effect. So the design argument, if it works only proves the existence of a design producing being. We cannot also say that this being has any of the attributes traditionally ascribed to God (classical theism).

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Hume had claimed that it was not justifiable to make the move from saying that every event in the universe has a cause, therefore the whole universe must have a cause. Coppleston believed that the universe must have an explanation whereas Russell saw no need.

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    6) Universe accidental Hume suggests that we can't be certain that the universe was not just one big cosmic accident. The argument from miracles is the argument that the occurrence of miracles demonstrates both the existence of God and the truth of Christianity.

  2. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    * Machines and devices have a human designer, but for the world there must be a bigger designer. I.e. God. * The amount of accuracy and perfect in the world is far greater than could be achieved by any human.

  1. The Design Argument for the Existence of God

    Philosophers to this day like Vardy are arguing it; therefore this perennial argument which comes up year after year is in its self a strength. William Paley in his book called Natural Theology offers possibly the most famous analogy for the existence of God through the teleological argument.

  2. Outline one version of the design argument for the existence of God

    person, the scientist trying to prove a theory or even the athlete trying to prove that he is better than any of his competitors. However, basically we can take to understand that proof is when someone attempts to show that something is true and that they are correct, to use the common legalistic phrase "beyond reasonable doubt".

  1. Assess the view that the design argument provides a convincing proof for the existence ...

    Also, the disorder may be part of the overall plan - such as freewill - which is all relative. Finally, this argument doesn't suggest that God still intervenes with the world, so therefore even if God did designed the world, that doesn't stop external factors from affecting it, which could explain the instances of disorder Hume was commenting upon.

  2. Can a computer think? Really think?

    Furthermore, his lack of understanding goes to show, he argues, that 'computers do not understand Chinese neither, because they are in the same situation as he is. They are mindless manipulators of symbols, just as he is - and they do not understand what they are saying, just as he doesn't.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work