• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How valid do you think the teleological argument is as a proof of the existence of God?

Extracts from this document...


Adileh Fard How valid do you think the teleological argument is as a proof of the existence of God? The design argument, sometimes called the teleological argument suggests that the world has a certain order or purpose in its appearance and so its specific structure points to a designer such as God. First of all the most important form of the design argument was put forward by a man called William Paley in his book 'Natural Theology'. Paley put this argument forward in the form of a simple analogy. He said if we were to come across a watch, we would conclude that all the parts fitted together for a purpose, and had not come together by chance. ...read more.


Also Hume argued that if God is all transcendent then the use of an analogy of manufactured objects would imply that it is more usual for a machine to be designed and made by many hands. This would suggest that there were many Gods. However, there are also arguments for the design argument. So we know that the design argument is a posteriori argument - it uses evidence of the world to create theories. Therefore the evidence provided is obvious to humankind because we can understand it and relate to it. This is a very strong point as we know that the world does exist and we know that it is complex for example: the way in which the planets in the solar system rotate, how they obey ...read more.


If the designer was all loving then suffering wouldn't have been included in the design. But some may argue that suffering and evil is due to the free will that humans have. If it wasn't for this free will, everyone would operate like robots and of course the world would be more or less perfect. But we do have free will and therefore we make mistakes in the world and some believe that these mistakes are what make us appreciate life itself. The weight of evidence from for and against arguments seems to be quite equal. There are good arguments for each side but in my opinion I think that the design argument tips the boat. I like the simple ness of the argument, it is easy to understand, makes perfect sense and it proves sufficient enough as an argument as it cannot be disproved by science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The design argument is also known as the teleological argument. The argument looks at ...

    3 star(s)

    the mark of design perceived in the world could be due to 'generation', 'self-regulation' and 'growth' rather than design. Darwin supported this criticism. Darwin proposed a theory of the survival of the fittest. He called this principle natural selection. The fittest members of the species survive and their characteristics become part of the character of the species.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    He argues it is possible to conceive of an effect without conceiving of the course of that effect.65 In reply, Frederic Copleston argued if you refuse to sit down at the chessboard, you cannot be checkmated. So he is saying you cannot prove an argument wrong, simply describing it as non-existent, as Russell tried to do.

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    The most important of his criticisms being that using an analogy to contrast the world with a human created object was inappropriate, as they are on two entirely different scales. We have experience in everyday life of many things being built and created but as far as we are aware there is nobody yet creating a new universe.

  2. Assess the view that the design argument provides a convincing proof for the existence ...

    This is basically highlighting the leap many theist philosophers take when deciding that the designer must be God. Conversely, as Paley stated, the only being we know of, who is benevolent, omnipotent and external is God - so as

  1. Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

    Then he looked at nature, he found it amazing that such a complex thing could come to be there, how could such a thing of beauty come about from pure chance? He concluded that there must be a great designer of nature, God.

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Hume describes miracles as being a violation of the laws of nature. The law of nature is regularity without expectation, so they have evidence amounting to proof. Therefore Hume claims that the testimony would only be sufficient if it amounted to stronger proof, or in other words it would be

  1. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    Consider the following two arguments: (1) Euthanasia is murder (2) Murder is wrong (3) Therefore euthanasia is wrong. (l) jiggiwig is murder (2) murder is wrong (3) Therefore jiggiwig is wrong The word euthanasia has simply been substituted for a nonsense word jiggiwig. The structure remains the same and in both cases if you deny the conclusion you must also reject at least one premise.

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    how the argument might be structured, and it is certainly an alternative perspective to consider. In order to understand the impact of these two assessments it is perhaps useful to look at what effect they have had on modern morality, and the society we live in today.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work