• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Humes criticism of the cosmological argument do not succeed. Discuss (10)

Extracts from this document...


Hume?s criticism of the cosmological argument do not succeed. Discuss (10) The Cosmological argument cannot succeed giving the evidence of Hume?s criticisms. The most famous expression of the Cosmological Arguments is known as Saint Thomas Aquinas' 'Five Ways,' seen as proofs of God's existence. These ways are formatted from the use of ?posteriori' knowledge, and because of this we can be uncertain of the validity if this theory. A posterior reasoning can only offer us probability, and not conclusive proof. Finding truth from our experiences/ senses can be doubted as we can be false judgments or get things wrong. ...read more.


who began the chain of events. This Prime Mover, who is unchanging, must have the power to change things thus starting the domino effect off. Hume criticises this and argues that there is no reason why the cause and effect chain cannot be infinite. We do not have to look back at the beginning of time when it must have started. This point is valid because one may say that the first and second ways state that nothing can cause its own existence, yet there is an exception for God who causes its own existence and therefore questions that if God is an exception to this rule then surely the universe itself could be an exception and therefore makes the need for a creator invalid as the universe could have formed itself. ...read more.


In contrast we cannot say this for certain. Hume pointed out that one event would not necessarily lead to another. You cannot infer the cause by looking at the effect; therefore we can?t assume God is the cause by looking at the universe as the effect. Furthermore we cannot assume that the Christian God is the cause of the universe. There could be many Gods that caused the universe to exist or even a team of daemons. All these points clearly out weight the strengths of the cosmological argument and Aquinas?s attempt to prove this. From the evidence that we know I believe that the statement is false and that Hume does provide a successful argument against the cosmological one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain Aquinas cosmological argument for the existence of God. Humes criticisms ...

    gives the name of God", therefore there needs to be a first cause - that is God. It is not possible for the efficient cause to go back to infinity, because if there is no efficient first cause, there will be no following causes.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    God's existence is a necessary presupposition of there being any moral judgements that are objective, that go beyond mere relativistic moral preferences; such judgements require standards external to any human mind-that is, they presume God's mind.51 Although, a person may know that God is omnipresent but that does not mean they fully understand his being.

  1. Assess Humes reasons for rejecting miracles

    The stories these people reported were usually circulated and exaggerated, altering them significantly as is the case with urban myths, such as that after Hurricane Katrina stating that law and order had broken down. Hume also considered the general level of education of the country as a whole to be important.

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    triangle together with its three angles' But Descartes reply is to agree this is true when it concerns a triangle, but false when it comes to God. Descartes argues that for God existence is part of essence. However Kant objects even further by claiming that Descartes treats existence like a property.

  1. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    perfect island must exist in reality - a conclusion which is clearly false. This was a challenge to the validity of the argument. Gaunilo worked with Anselm's skeleton argument, and showed that with the same skeleton your premises lead you to a false conclusion.

  2. Fathers and Sons - The Quarrel – Chapter 10 .

    without the principals that aristocrats preach; he is directly implying that Bazarov is ignorant and stupid. This argument I feel was more of a personal statement made towards Bazarov rather than a good argument to debate over, however Bazarov retains his dignity and moves to another topic, naming a few words used in aristocracy and labeling them as utter nonsense.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work