• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I will be discussing John Stewart Mill theory on utilitarianism. Then I will point out an important objection the to his ethical theory. Then in conclusion I will compare and contrast the theory of utilitarianism to ethical vegetarianism.

Extracts from this document...


Utilitarianism I will be discussing John Stewart Mill theory on utilitarianism. Then I will point out an important objection the to his ethical theory. Then in conclusion I will compare and contrast the theory of utilitarianism to ethical vegetarianism. John Stewart Mill is the man most famous for using the utilitarianism view. It can be used to answer the practical question "What ought a man to do?" The utilitarian answer is to act in a manner to produce the best consequences possible for an action. This means that the moral worth of an action is determined by the action's consequences. So the view of utilitarianism is also the view of a consequentialist. One of the main views of utilitarianism is the greatest happiness view. Mill states "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness." From this statement it should be clear that utilitarianism is a consequentialist view. The moral worth of an action, by whether it produces pleasure or pain, is determined by its consequence. Consequences of the utilitarian includes all of the good and bad produced by the action, whether happening after the action has been performed or during its performance. ...read more.


In conclusion there are three ways to maximize your overall happiness according to Mill. The first is overall happiness. You add up all the happiness in the word and then subtract the unhappiness. There will always be happiness in the world until unhappiness out weighs happiness. The second is average happiness. That is to have all the people in the world have the exact same amount of happiness as everyone else. The third is maximization of everyone's happiness to the fullest extent. Philosophers spend years trying to think of objections to views of the great philosophers. It would be hard for me to find a concrete objection to utilitarianism in a week. So the objection that I think is the most established is the "rule" utilitarianism. Think of the whole world lying and stealing to maximize happiness would have bad consequences. But it is not certain that an occasional lie to avoid embarrassment or an occasional theft form a rich man would not have good consequences, and would be acceptable or even required by utilitarianism. But the utilitarian would answer that the widespread practice of such acts would result in loss of trustworthiness and security to society. To meet the objection too not permit the occasional lie or theft would bring about the "rule" utilitarianism. ...read more.


There is evidence that humans do not need to eat fish to survive; generations and generations of vegetarians have proved this. So the argument must be that eating meat or animals makes people happier for the utilitarian maximizing their happiness. But for this to be a good happiness eating meat must make people happier than they would be not eating meat. And that there is no way that they can get the same benefit without something of lower cost giving a equal or greater happiness. Would the actions of humans eating animals bring about better consequences than leaving them be, with out taking their population out of equilibrium? That is where we have to weigh out the best possible action from a utilitarian view. Would it be morally correct to slaughter the animals for our own pleasure? The utilitarian would have to ask himself one question. Would he get more happiness out of eating meat or saving the lives of thousands of animals in his lifetime? I think that Mills utilitarian view is very strong. Everyone makes his or her decisions in life to be happy. When we come to a hard decision we should look at the consequences of each action and see which one will bring about the most happiness, that one will usually be the correct decision. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Outline the main features of Utilitarianism andExamine critically criticisms that have been offered against ...

    Examine critically criticisms that have been offered against utilitarianism As we see in Utilitarianism, we are utterly dependent on a consequence of an action but this can be seen to be its greatest weakness. Can we be sure what the outcome will actually be?

  2. Examine the key features of utilitarianism and its strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    an obvious flaw, as most people would be inclined to save their mother. Despite this, a theory that promotes pleasure must be a good thing as most people see pleasure as desirable over pain. The intention of Utilitarianism was not to create immorality but to please to maximum number of people possible.

  1. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make Utilitarianism unacceptable? ...

    However if a person were still dissatisfied with finding utilitarianism as advantageous then they should consider the other various types of utilitarianism. For example, Rule Utilitarianism is very different from the standard utilitarianism (which is otherwise known as Act Utilitarianism).

  2. Consider the view that humans have no free will.

    Protestant view that God has already decided who will be saved and who will not) and the determinist ethical viewpoint. This idea was used in a very famous court case involving Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb's desire to commit "the perfect murder" after claiming to be Nietzschean supermen (Friedrich Nietzsche

  1. Explain what you think is the strongest objection to this argument. Next, explain what ...

    He presents two pieces of behavior that are wrapped together in the exact same situation, but only differ to the "factor" in question. If the behavior differs morally, the factor is morally significant in itself. If not, it is morally insignificant.

  2. Examine how Benthams utilitarianism may be applied to one ethical issue of your choice. ...

    * Certainty - the likeliness the pleasure/pain will occur. A pleasure that is 100% likely to occur is a higher pleasure than one that is only 50% likely to occur. * Intensity - How intense will the pleasure/pain be? A pleasure that will only bring a little bit of happiness is seen less valuable than one that would bring more.

  1. Examine the distinguishing features of a deontological ethical theory.

    If it is always wrong to tell a lie and always wrong to break a promise what if I have to tell a lie to keep a promise? This is a major weakness of Kant's theory and he provides no answer to this problem.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of utilitarianism, what are the main problems of ...

    have no money to spend on what they wanted, even though it benefits the greater good. The individual's personal pursuit of happiness is drastically lessened. Rule utilitarianism takes into account the course of action when determining the greatest good for the greatest number, by looking at what should be pursued by a whole community.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work