• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Immanuel Kant - discussing Critique Of Pure Reason.

Extracts from this document...


Immanuel Kant was born in 1724 in Konigsberg East Prussia he became a lecturer in philosophy and became concerned with metaphysics (the study of what lies beyond nature). Most importantly he became interested in ethics and one of his most important works is The Critique Of Pure Reason this addresses three important questions 'what can I know?' 'What ought I do?' And 'what may I hope for?' The dictionary definition of ethics is '1.ethic set of principles concerning right and wrong and how people should behave. 2.Ethics the branch of philosophy concerned with moral principles.' To believe in a certain ethical system you have to have certain morals or standards. The dictionary Definition of Moral is '1. Concerned with the principles of right and wrong behaviour. 2. Conforming to accept standards of behaviour. A lesson about right or wrong that you learn from a story or experience. Kant's theory is deontological 'concerned with actions and motives.' There are several confusing key terms that Kant uses to describe his ethical theory for which the meanings are: A Priori - Knowable without prior reference to experiences. A Posteriori - Knowable through experience. ...read more.


There are three principles to The Categorical Imperative. 1. Universalisation, If its good for one person its good for everyone else. It is applied to people in the same situation, what they do should be applied to everyone and if it is morally good then it would be a universal law. 2. Treat humans as ends In themselves. You must treat everyone as equals. You have not got the right to exploit or enslave any other human. You may seek the happiness of others as long as its within the law and allows freedom of others.3. Act as if you live in a kingdom of ends. You should act as a rule maker of society, you must not follow bad examples of others just to impress them. You must assume everyone is doing the morally right thing. If everyone followed these rules then hypothetically we would live in a wonderful society where no selfish actions would take place and no bad crimes would ever be committed. We all know that this would never be the case as people do not stop to think about their actions. People wouldn't always follow The Categorical Imperative even though they should so Kant devised a term called the hypothetical imperative which is not a moral decision it is to do with wants and desires. ...read more.


There are also many weaknesses to Kant's ethical theory, the theory refuses to allow exceptions to different situations. It says all people should be treated equally and sometimes this is not possible depending on the situation. It is impossible to always do a duty without having some sort of selfish motive no mater how small. It is also never possible to sit and think about the categorical imperative before you decide on an action to take. Kant's theory is to general no two situations are ever the same therefore you cant apply the same theory every time. If I had to chose an ethical theory it would have to be Kant's even though I do not totally agree with it, I agree that it seems to be a fair theory but I like to take situations into account and consider actions, motives and consequences, Kant completely contradicts his deontological view when universalising situations as he considers consequences which in one way is good but then it makes me think if Kant's theory is that reliable and it may possibly be to confusing to use. Kant's ethical theory is not practical and I would suggest that people use a mixture of different theories to make decisions. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    about it. However, the criticism is unfounded. Although there are three formulations of the moral law each one is remarkably clear. And what is important about each is the impeccable logic that underpins it. Every time we universalise a maxim (such as 'Always tell the truth' and so on)

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    If the membership of the Church finds them in harmony with the tradition, and if they are not widely challenged, the formulation may remain at that level, and become part of the teaching ministry of the Church. If it is challenged and debated, it may become the subject of conciliar decision.

  1. Ethical Theories are of no help when discussing matters of sex and relationships

    with marriage acting purely as a stop-gap for those who can not exercise sufficient self-control, 'it is better to marry than to be aflame with passion'. REFERENCE. Augustinian thought supports this restrictive approach by explaining the apparently sinful nature of sexuality as being rooted in the Fall: the irrational nature

  2. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    The well meaning fool is often bought up in opposition to Kant as an example of why consequences should at least be considered. Someone with flawless intentions who foolishly doesn't take into account all the connotations and repercussions of his action, creating disaster, would seemingly be a highly moral person under the Kantian ethics.

  1. What does being good mean for Kant.

    Utilitarian ethics is some thing that Kant theory directly disagrees with. Utilitarian would for instance say its ok to lie if in the result of lying greater happiness is caused, but Kant would say that to lie would be wrong no matter what.

  2. utilitarianism and kant

    Act utilitarianism has the ability to justify virtually any act; however it may be impractical to suggest that we should measure each moral choice at any time. Rule utilitarianism establish the best overall rule by determining the course of action which, when pursued by the whole community, leads to the greatest result.

  1. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    therefore makes it his fundamental identity, and to see it that way paves him to see himself as a Citizen of the Kingdom of Ends. This is moral identity. Like the social identities, moral identity carries obligations. And this identity stands with other identities.

  2. Examine the key ideas of one critique of the link between religion and morality. ...

    Plato?s second horn, ?Is X good because God commands it?? suggests that God becomes the sole arbiter of morality and he does not need to justify his demands because whatever he wills must become good. It presents a tautology, as ?good? is equated with ?God? and effectively argues that a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work