• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways does the existence of evil and suffering pose physical problems for theists

Extracts from this document...


In what ways does the existence of evil and suffering pose physical problems for theists? Discuss. (33) "Theism is the belief in the existence of one or more divinities or deities. There is also a narrower sense in which theism refers to the belief that one or more divinities are immanent in the world, yet transcend it, along with the idea that divinity(s) is/are omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent". Therefore, one of the greatest problems facing a believer in a good, all powerful God is the existence of evil and apparent undeserved suffering in the world. The problem has been presented as: "Either God wishes to remove evil but is unable and therefore cannot be all - powerful, or he is able to remove evil but is unwilling and therefore cannot be wholly good. The assumption is that a good God would eliminate evil as far as he is able. Given that he is all-powerful therefore he should eliminate it all. However evil exists. In other words God has the means (power) ...read more.


Human action brought it about. Importantly, Augustine said that God is justified in not intervening, because the suffering is a consequence of human action. So, God is perfect. The world he created reflected that perfection. Lastly, he said that evil is not a substance - but it is a deprivation. Augustine's theory hinges on the idea that evil is a privation. He uses the analogy of the blindness - blindness is not an "entity", but an absence of sight. Augustine accounts for evil by ascribing it to human agency. Evil came about as a result of the misuse of free will. All suffering is therefore a consequence of this abuse of free will. However, God has not abandoned any responsibility for the world. If God were simply just, everyone would be suitably punished. Instead, God's grace brought about the possibility of reconciliation through Jesus Christ, whose crucifixion saved a certain number from eternal punishment. Theists would respond to this in several ways by commenting on different aspects. For example, by placing the responsibility for evil on the Devil and human agencies it might be thought that God is absolved from blame. ...read more.


Also, theists believe that God is wholly good and omnipotent, but if He is to be these qualities, then why does He allow suffering to enter the world? This is important, and theists would look at Irenaeus's theodicy and formulate that, perhaps, God created this evil and suffering for human beings to develop and, eventually evil and suffering will be overcome and everyone will develop God's likeness, living in glory in heaven. Overall, theists would look at this problem in different ways as explained above in Irenaeus' and Augustine's theodicy. They believe in the existence of God and that He is immanent in the world, yet transcendent, along with the idea that He is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent. From this, theists would say that evil and suffering should not be a problem in the world, because God is all loving and wholly good, and He would not allow this to be present in the world today. However, by looking at Irenaeus's theodicy, one could say that suffering and evil are present in order for us as humans to grow and develop into better people. ?? ?? ?? ?? Gurleen Chaggar LVI5 Miss. Thacker Philosophy Essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays


    Also, the creation of Hell is puzzling because surely God would not create it unless 'He' knew that 'The Fall' would happen which further questions 'His' perfection.

  2. Explain how the theodicy of Irenaeus differs from that of Augustine and Evil cannot ...

    It seems totally unfair that innocent children are given such extreme suffering in comparison to others across the globe. Another sticking point for criticisers or Irenaean theory is that it is totally dependent in belief of the afterlife, it is claimed that we are challenged by evil and suffering to become closer to God and grow closer to his likeness.

  1. Explain the problem of evil (25 marks). Are the theodicies attempts to ...

    the purpose of our lives a mystery so we as humans continue to strive to reach a state of holiness and ultimately , God. A criticism to the Iranaen theodicy is that the theodicy views evil as a means to an end, humans can then ask " is the end worth it?"

  2. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    Rather, Augustine suggests that the free will of humans has led to suffering in the world. Thomas Aquinas also supports this theory, who also suggests that evil is necessary for the appreciation of good. St. Augustine accounts for evil by ascribing it to human agency.

  1. problem of evil

    It presents itself as a philosophical problem as it compels the believer to accept conflicting claims that are logically impossible to reconcile. It is also a diverse problem; evil manifests itself in many different ways, demanding separate explanations. The problem of evil has proved itself to be a challenging problem,

  2. Problem of evil

    Rowe gives the example of a fawn that is burned but no-one knows - who can possibly grow spiritually? It can be summarised thus; 1) Evil and Suffering Exists 2) An Omnipotent and Omnibenevolent God could and would prevent such a sheer amount of evil 3)

  1. Utopia - The Impossibility of Perfection

    This method of achieving so-called social harmony cannot but remind one of Fredrich Nietzsche's views in "Morals as Fossilized Violence": "by [methods of punishment] the individual was finally taught to remember five or six "I won'ts" which entitled him to participate in the benefit of society."

  2. Irenaen Theodicy cannot justify the existence of evil. Discuss

    as a lesson and is also not usually understood by the child as being a good thing for them later on. For example being punished for playing with fire, the child may think that this is unjust at the time as they hadn?t actually done anything they thought was ?bad?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work