• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways may suffering create a philosophical problem for religious believers? Outline 2 solutions to these problems

Extracts from this document...


A) In what ways may suffering create a philosophical problem for religious believers? Outline 2 solutions to these problems Suffering is an unfortunate concept in the world today and creates a philosophical problem for religious believers, especially those that believe in God. God is seen to as an all loving and all knowing figure and the reputed creator of the universe in a lot of religions. God's qualities are that he is omnipotent (he can do anything), omniscient (he knows everything), omnipresent (he is everywhere) and omnibenevolent (he is all loving). If God is established to have these qualities, then why is evil and suffering a part of this world? Surely if God has these attributes, no suffering would exist. This is a main problem for religious believers as it seems to lower the evidence for Gods existence. Also, while suffering is present it doesn't seem to affect just the people, who are better off than others, it is distributed throughout society, to a large extent, and to those people that already live an unfortunate life. God is supposed to represent a moral figure that shows omnipotence and goodness. J.L Mackie, a philosopher, observed that these propositions cannot all be true at the same time. This is known as the inconsistent triad: Suffering comes from two forms of evil. Natural and Moral. ...read more.


In conclusion Augustine's theodicy in theory is a rather successful explanation and defence for the existence of evil however there are some criticisms in the theodicy as with every other belief. The Ireanean theodicy is another more modern approach to why suffering exists in the world and unlike Augustine, St Ireanaus claimed that man was created imperfectly, but was reaching to be perfect like God. God created the universe with possibility of evil and he would not intervene, as that would stop human free will. However, God is all loving, so eventually humans would develop into the image of God and live forever with him. The solution in this theodicy falls under the three responses to natural evil. One being, useful as a means to knowledge, meaning suffering can be useful as a basic means for staying alive, two, soul making, where a person can build upon their character and finally a predictable environment. As natural evil is inevitable it provides us with a stable and predictable environment. This theodicy is seen as a popular answer to the Problem of Evil from a Christian point of view. This is because it gives a reason for pain and also, it gives hope. St Augustine's theodicy also deals with the Problem of Evil, but it is not as popular as an answer, since many people see it as giving no hope. ...read more.


Evil exists, but it is very close to his upbringing. To him it's the indifference that is primarily offensive. Ivan notes that those who do not believe in God but strive to accomplish "the transformation of all humanity on a new pattern" turn the religious idea of salvation inside out. In other words anarchism and socialism are just a reversed glove of Christian Kingdom of Heaven. Again the problem of evidence arises. There is not sufficient evidence to explain whether the existence of God is probable or not. Where as the logical side seems easier to take on board. There is clearly evil in the world so either God does not exist or there is no evil in the world. Or If God and evil are to exist at the same time, then God must have a very good reason for permitting evil to exist. (Could be some points mentioned in the theodices). In conclusion the solutions can be successful to some extent that you do believe in God. However, now that scientific evidence for evolution and astrology has become more popular and believable, the theory of God being the creator of the world may be left in the dark. If solid evidence could be produced for the existence of suffering and God then the theodices would proof to be a lot more successful as many more people could easily agree. Carmen Barlow Richard Dunn R.S Essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    The only solution is that he does not exist at all. Moral Evil is simply suffering/evil caused by mankind actions, with the greatest example being the Holocaust; moral evil is inside every human being, and if God created man in his "own image" then surely the choice to commit evil

  2. Explain the free will defence. Both the Augustinian and Irenaean theodicies contain the argument ...

    This insistence that God is the cause of free human action leads to a problem. If God is the cause of freely chosen good actions, then He is also the cause of evil actions. If God is the cause of moral evil, then He isn't good.


    Therefore, the possibility of evil is necessary as the world can never be as perfect as God. 'The Fall' is also central to his theodicy because when Adam and Eve disobeyed God, man's original purity was lost and all their descendents inherited original sin and original guilt because they were 'seminally present in the loins of Adam'.

  2. Examine and Comment on a philosophical analysis of religious experience

    is an illustration of the differing nature of an attempt to prove or disprove God to that of events in the phenomenal world: "Two people return to their long neglected garden and find, among the weeds, that a few of the old plants are surprisingly vigorous.

  1. Critically assess the problems for believers who say that God is omniscient

    God cannot do what is logically impossible. Swinburne places limits on divine omniscience. God knows everything that happened in the past and knows everything that is happening at any given moment in time. God does not possess foreknowledge otherwise He would have no freedom to act in the future.

  2. What is meant by the problem of evil and suffering for religious believers? Examine ...

    Flew believes that this is the biggest problem for religious believers because they do not have an answer as to why God should not intervene. Evil and suffering raises question about God?s goodness and it may lead people to believe that God is not all good, therefore he is morally imperfect.

  1. Why does evil and suffering cause problems for religious believers?

    God is also omnipotent and as such is more powerful than evil. Just because God does not overpower evil or stop something from happening only means for reasons known to Himself He chooses to restrain His power. This happens day in and day out in the natural world.

  2. Examine two solutions to the problem of suffering

    had gone wrong; either the world wasn't perfect to begin with or God had created it to go wrong. This leads to another criticism of Augustine; Science. All scientific explanations of the universe suggest evolution, that humanity along with everything else is evolving to get better, for example the eye.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work