• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Irenaen Theodicy cannot justify the existence of evil. Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Irenaen Theodicy cannot justify the existence of evil Going solely off what Irenaeus states in his theodicy does justify the existence of evil quite easily for somebody that is already a religious follower and needs to have his or her faith reaffirmed, however you would need to ignore a few glaring flaws in his argument for why God allows evil if you are an atheist or agnostic. Irenaeus follows a clear logical path making very few leaps (apart from that of the existence of God, but this is a proof for why evil can ?or even has to- exist if there is a God so, for arguments sake, God?s existence must be accepted for Irenaeus? explanation of evil to work) in logic. Irenaeus started off with the bible, stating that there is a difference between the ?likeness? and the ?image? of God and, in Genesis, God created man in his own image and an image is radically different from a likeness. That was Irenaeus first point, that the ?image? of God means that we might only look like God and we have yet to achieve the content, behaviour, morals, thoughts or feelings of God. ...read more.

Middle

Morals would also not truly exist if evil did not exist; if everybody did the right thing every single time, if everybody was forced to do the right thing by God, then all of our actions would be meaningless. Take, for example, an arranged marriage; in this scenario there tends to not be real love between the two people so the marriage is meaningless in the context of what a marriage is supposed to represent (love, unity, friendship, companionship) as forcing people to marry would not also force them to feel love. In the same line of thought forcing people to always be good and do the right thing would not mean that those people actually know what good or the right thing is, they have not developed or earned that knowledge of good and evil for themselves. Irenaeus thought that anything given, not earned, would be next to worthless as you never actually learn anything. Due to those two main point Irenaeus then argued that God is in fact doing a good thing by allowing what we perceive to be evil to exist as if there was no evil there would be no way for good to truly exist and there would also be next to no opportunities for people to learn. ...read more.

Conclusion

At the very least the amount of ?evil? and suffering in the world could be lowered or, as Swinburne argued, we could learn through pleasure more than through pain. As with the example before of learning about when to eat through hunger surely we could have learned when to eat from the pleasure of being full and the lack of pleasure when we are hungry or pleasure for committing good acts and a lack of pleasure for committing crimes or immoral acts. Irenaeus also believed that everybody will go to heaven at some point; personally I believe that this could make sense if Irenaeus also said that ?if you fail to get into heaven the first time- you are sent to retry life and you continue to retry life until you have learned from your mistakes. Alas Irenaeus in fact said that anything akin to reincarnation was ?absurd? and he instead believed in hell which, going off of his previous points, I believe is self-contradictory as hell would only offer a punishment and no true opportunity to learn from your mistakes. In conclusion Irenaen theodicy can justify the existence of evil easily to religious followers however it runs into problems when people begin to question the existence or power of God. Robert Rosca ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. "Religious Language is meaningless." Discuss.

    The second way is being equivocal. This is where the same word is used in two different situations and with totally different meanings, for example, a bar of chocolate and a bar at a pub. Therefore, all the words we use for God, such as love or superior, could mean absolutely nothing.

  2. Science Solves All The Problems About Where We Come From Discuss

    In the Middle Ages, when people didn't know or understand how something, they would simply use God to fill in the gaps in their knowledge out of ignorance of the truth. For example, the Bubonic Plague, which was an extremely contagious bacterium, unknown to those at the time.

  1. Explain how the theodicy of Irenaeus differs from that of Augustine and Evil cannot ...

    Why is it that whilst I sit here in the life of luxury children are dying every second in Africa from curable diseases? A particularly poignant question when we take into account the fact that many of these dying children are brought up in strong Christian families where god is an active part of their life.

  2. God is most clearly revealed to humanity through scripture. Discuss

    examples such as Timothy 3:16: "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correction and training in righteousness" In comparison, a non propositional view is generally believed by liberal Christians and is the view that the Bible is seen not as a source of infallible information provided by

  1. The concept of disembodied existence is coherent - Discuss

    God certainly might have created a perfect duplicate of the original manuscript, but it would not be that one; its earliest moment of existence would have been after Augustine's death; it would never have known the impress of his hand; it would not have been a part of the furniture of the world when he was alive; and so on."

  2. An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

    The resurrection is styled a conversion to distinguish it from creation by which an entirely new being comes into existence. In ancient times the resurrection was denied especially by the Sadducees, the Gnostics, the Maniehreans, and the medieval Albigenses, and is still violently attacked by atheists, materialists, and rationalists.

  1. problem of evil

    The conclusions drawn from this are that either God is not omnipotent and cannot stop evil from existing, or that God is not all-loving and chooses not to stop evil existing, or that in fact God does not exist. This can be used as an argument for the non-existence of God.

  2. Ethical language is meaningless. Discuss.

    This does mean that ethical statements can be based on emotions; however, these are not merely arbitrary, but rather based on our experience of the world and how we want it to be. As he saw ethical statements as not only expressions of emotion, but also the result of attitudes

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work