• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Killing Ever Morally Justifiable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ?IS KILLING EVER MORALLY JUSTIFIABLE?? Most moral codes forbid murder; murder is against the law in most countries and people will most often be punished for murder and even in the bible, murder is considered wrong, it says ?thou shalt not kill? in the 10 commandments. From and absolutists view, killing is never justifiable, it is always wrong and it can never be right but a relativist thinks killing can be justified depending on the circumstances and being a relativist I do think that killing can be justified. I believe morals are objective ? they are not black and white and every person has a different way of thinking and one cannot determine whether or not a person?s actions are morally wrong unless you are that person. Killing is a tragedy but if the person believes it is right because of their circumstances, religion or culture then the person would believe there is a just cause. ...read more.

Middle

On the other hand, war is sometimes unnecessary, for example, jihadists declaring war on non-believers. In the case of euthanasia, I think it is right because I think helping a person to end their suffering is sometimes the most loving thing a person can do for them and also people have free will and have the ability to think for themselves and so should be allowed to choose. Situation Ethics is easy to apply here; you can dispense with rules about killing because the most loving thing to do may well be to give someone a peaceful death. Situation Ethics is personal - it puts people before rules. It is also pragmatic, allowing us to do whatever works best in the circumstances. What is the use in keeping someone alive to suffer? Relativism is at the heart of the theory. This means that in any situation, when faced with a difficult decision about whether to help someone to die, we need to act out of love, which means ignoring any hard and fast rule and doing what the situation requires. ...read more.

Conclusion

Having an abortion because of financial pressures, other family members' needs, education, work are justifiable reasons. It may in some circumstances be right to deny a woman the right to choose to have an abortion if doing so would bring about the greatest good. An example of a current affair which questions whether killing is morally justifiable is the when UK forces shot British ISIS fighters in Syria. This is killing but I think it can be justified because if the UK forces hadn?t shot the ISIS fighters then they would have tortured and killed innocent people. Another example is one where 2 white-American police officers shot a black teenager because they suspected he was in possession of cocaine. I don?t think that this is morally justifiable because they had no reason to kill him. First of all possession of cocaine isn?t a good enough reason to murder someone and secondly he was only a suspect, they shot him even though they were not 100% sure that he was in possession of cocaine. In conclusion, I do think killing can be morally justifiable depending on the circumstance for example for self-defence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. RE euthanasia for and against

    He feels we are duty bound to follow these obligations. In reference to euthanasia, he would be against it, as he does not believe euthanasia to be a moral obligation. Kant believes that we just do know what to do because he said we have categorical imperatives, which are a set of immutable rules that we all follow.

  2. Just War

    Christian members of organizations such as CND argue that the Just War theory may have applied in a pre-nuclear age but in the nuclear, biological and chemical age, modern weapons of mass destruction make nonsense of the theory.

  1. This essay will seek to prove that the statement "the end justifies the means" ...

    Moreover, Machiavelli goes on to argue that a ruler must necessarily act against the interests of his people. To Machiavelli, the people do not know what is best. Thus, the prince must utilize cruelty, fear, deception, and brute strength to subdue the interests of the people.

  2. How far is killing in warfare more justifiable than other kinds of killing?

    Many were attacked; some had their houses bombed yet none retaliated violently, and eventually the segregation laws were suspended, and the movement gained massive publicity (largely due to the humanist method of protesting). However, not all pacifists are Christians. In certain cases Utilitarians can adopt the pacifist position - if

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work