• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is knowledge justified true belief? The knowledge being talked about in the question is propositional knowledge.

Extracts from this document...


Is knowledge justified true belief? The knowledge being talked about in the question is propositional knowledge. An example of prepositional knowledge is; "my name is Bert" justified true belief, is a proposition that someone feels is correct and for which they have a cogent argument for believing so and which is in fact true. But is knowledge equivalent to justified true belief? For knowledge to be equivalent to justified true belief, it follows that justified true belief is necessary and sufficient for knowledge. Belief is necessary for knowledge, since without belief you would be unable to maintain that you knew a certain proposition. For example you may say that you know that you are holding a pen in your hand but unless you believed you were holding a pen in your hand you couldn't know that. ...read more.


For example a psychic who predicts that a card picked from a pack will be a six of hearts, even though he has got the card right for the last 100 times cannot be said to know the card will be a six of hearts until it is picked from the pack. So all three are necessary for knowledge an example would be "I know it is raining since water is falling from the clouds above my head". The only question left is; are these three criteria sufficient? It would seem that they are, however it is possible to think of situations where a true belief can be based on a falsehood. ...read more.


So it would seem that a fourth condition is necessary for knowledge. Reliabalists believe that only beliefs that are justified by a reliable method can constitute knowledge. The problem with this is that 'reliable' is a very vague term for example a reliable car may break down once a year however if an aeroplane broke down once a year it would be unreliable. They also maintain that beliefs that are based on false beliefs are not formed by a reliable method. However there can be reliable methods for gaining true beliefs that are based on falsehoods for example the Aztecs believed that if they sacrificed people to their gods the sun would come up again the next day and when they did so the sun did indeed come up. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Discuss the characteristics of the scientific method which makes it superior over other methods ...

    What is the "scientific method"? The scientific method is the best way yet discovered for scrutinizing the truth from lies and delusion. It is based upon evidence rather than belief. This distinguishes science from faith. The scientific method revolves around the following key steps: 1.

  2. How might we combat the Gettier Problem? In giving your answer set forth two ...

    So it is true that the secretary is in the office, the executive accepts that it is true, and she is completely justified in so accepting that he is. So once again all the conditions are met however it is a false knowledge.

  1. Innate Knowledge

    and understand that it must be the universal. For instance, when I look at any bed, I relate it back to the perfect ideal of bed and see that it is a bed. Innate Forms are the only true knowledge for Plato because things that we experience are constantly changing

  2. What are the limitations on our personal liberty? Are all of them justified?

    in a more popular act (to use his example, a person playing sport), or a situation where both parties are not consenting (parental chastisement, a situation in which written law is just as subjective). Also, an interesting fact is that although the European Court of Human Rights ruled that there

  1. Theory of Knowledge

    He states that "there are never any sure signs of which being awake can be distinguished from being asleep", meaning that how can we be sure that when we are awake, eating an apple for example, we are not actually asleep, dreaming this experience.

  2. Do you know you are reading this question?

    Quine also seeks justification through foundationalism. A foundationalist takes the stance that the structure of all knowledge is similar to development of a building, with the necessary foundations being laid for a study structure to be built upon. Foundationalists see a structure with certain beliefs at the bottom, on which superstrucural beliefs are built upon.

  1. Explain and illustrate one criticism of the view that a belief is knowledge if ...

    It is from this that the most common flaw, with Coherentism is found. There may not be just one set of justifiable beliefs, relating to a certain number of beliefs. There can be multiple sets. Furthermore, internally all of these beliefs may be individually coherent.

  2. Theory Of Knowledge essay

    confirmation processes, it is still affected by the fundamental flaws of inductivism and basic criticism of the original scientific model. Questions such as, Why is it legitimate to assume that things will continue to behave as they always have done?, continue to be ignored and affect the validity of any conclusions drawn using this technique.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work