• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kant and the Categorical Imperative

Extracts from this document...


Kant and the Categorical Imperative a) Duty should be done simply because it is duty. Explain how Kant analysed this concept. Kant aimed to create a theory of ethics that relied not on emotion but reason and could be universally applied and not obscured by religion or person experience. To do this he created two fundamental rules of ethics; that if an action can be universalised and have good effects then it is moral, and that the morality of an action cannot be based on the consequences of an outcome. The best example to use and one that Kant used himself is lying. Kant analysed the concept of lying based on these rules. If the action of lying was universalised so that everybody did it then it would have a bad effect as no one could trust what anyone was saying, therefore it is immoral and must not be done. Some people argue that the consequences of lying justifies the action of lying; that the end justifies the means. For example if to save someone's life you must tell a lie then is acceptable to lie. ...read more.


Kant stated that a person who commits moral act or follows a moral law because they use reason to come to conclusion that that the act or law is more moral than someone committing an act or following a law because they gain pleasure or to please God. He believed that if something was your moral duty and you must do it regardless of whether you want to or what the consequences are. b) 'Categorical Imperatives allow no room for compassion in the treatment of women wanting abortions'. Discuss The categorical imperative is the idea that one should 'Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law'- Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason. Only actions which can be universalt applied (expected to be done by everyone) and have a good effect are moral and it is our duty to carry out theses moral duties regardless of circumstances or outcome. 'Categorical Imperatives allow no room for compassion in the treatment of women wanting abortions' is absolutely correct, for many reasons. ...read more.


The implications of this principle are that any activity that denies the individual dignity of a human being in order to achieve its end is undeniably wrong. The idea of abortion and the termination of human life are contradictory to the absolute fundamental points of the categorical imperative- that human life is priceless, and that humans should never be treated as a means to an end, as they are an end in themselves. The action of an abortion is denying a human life of all dignity, value, and is certainly treating humanity as a means to the end of a childless life. Kant, and the categorical imperative therefore show absolutely no room for compassion in the treatment of women wanting abortions, as, even though, for example, the mother may not be a suitable parent, or the child's quality of life may be poor, under no circumstances, according to the principles of the categorical imperative, can compassion be allowed for women wishing to murder another human, denying them their worth, and using them as a means to an end. Dr. Culbard Emily Oelrich Ethics 12RTR 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain what Kant meant by the Categorical Imperative.

    By not providing us with any rules or laws, it could be hard to see which moral rules can and cannot be universalised. When Kant applies the categorical imperative to this situation he discovers that it leads to a contradiction, for if breaking promises were to become universal then no

  2. Compare Utilitarianism With Kant's Theory of The Categorical Imperative And Explain Which You Think ...

    For example, if in one instance, it is morally correct to break the law, chaos would occur should everyone do so - even if in all their individual cases, breaking the law is morally correct. Also, pleasure is a subjective idea - what some class as pleasure, others class as

  1. 'Duty should be done, simply because it is duty.' Explain how Kant analysed this ...

    If he were to borrow from his friend, the maxim he would be applying would be: if you need money, lie about your financial status in order to borrow it. Kant strongly believed that this should not become a universal maxim, as no one would trust anyone, and no one would be prepared to loan money.

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    Three Formulations of the Categorical Imperative 1. The first formulation of the categorical imperative, referred to by Paton as the `Formula of Universal Law' (p.129) is stated thus: 'Act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a univeral law' (Fundamental Principles, p.38).

  1. Explain Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    that you act as if you, and everyone else were treating each other as ends. You can't act on a rule that presumes that others don't treat people as ends. You can't create a maxim such as "I may steal as all others steal."

  2. A. Explain what Kant meant by the categorical argument. B. Asses Kant's claims critically ...

    We might be tempted to think that some movements that make actions good and have a positive goal -to make people happy - are then moral. But this is not so Kant says if the act is not done with the right motive.

  1. The use of the Categorical Imperative makes no room for compassionate treatment of women ...

    The key issue in this discussion is whether or not the foetus is a human or not, and whether it has the status that comes with being human or not. If it is a human, then abortion is definitely not allowed.

  2. People should always do their duty. Explain how Kant understood this concept.

    Whilst "intelligence, wit" and "judgement" are all brilliant in most cases, they are automatically good. Someone could use their intelligence to hurt other people. Wit could be used to make fun of someone. You could be prejudice against different types of people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work