• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kant's theory of Ethics

Extracts from this document...


` Kant and the Deontological Argument Immanuel Kant was born in Konigsberg, East Prussia, 1724, and died in 1804 and so, was alive during much of the 18th Century. One of his most important pieces of work was the development of his own theory of ethics, which aimed to prove that ethics should be based on reason. That is why Kant's theory is considered to be of a deontological nature. The historical context of the 18th Century is important when trying to realise why Kant came up with his particular ethical theory based on reason. This period of time is named the 'Enlightenment Period' during which there was increased recognition of the need for the development of an ethical theory based on reason, and reason alone. Kant was, to a great extent, influenced by German pietism i.e. the view that religion should be based on human experience rather than study or rational proof. He stands as part of the 'European Enlightenment', the movement that aimed to go beyond authority and superstition so as to deal with morality based solely on human reason. In its basics, Kant's moral theory is deontological, meaning it rests on the concept of duty or obligation (derived from the Greek word 'ontos' meaning duty/obligation). Kant argues we should handle our affairs through duty to the moral law. Kant starts off by arguing that reason is the primary source of knowledge. ...read more.


This is in contrast to the 'hypothetical imperative', which is not absolute. The hypothetical imperative is characterised by the word 'if' 'IF you want to gain praise, you should help people' whereas the categorical imperative is characterised by the word 'ought' 'you OUGHT to follow the categorical imperative because it is the moral law'. The categorical imperative is not dependent on anyone's desire to make it an imperative; it is binding not just in some situations and for certain people, but always, for everyone. There are three formulations of Kant's categorical imperative. The first is 'The Formula of Universal Law'. This states 'Act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a universal law' (Fundamental Principles, page 38) that is to say, whatever moral law we choose to guide our actions, the law must make rational sense when universalised. In this case we can use the example of 'The False Promise'. A man is forced to take out a loan. He knows he will not be able to repay it but he knows that he will not get the loan if he does not promise to repay the money. He does not know whether to take the money and lie, or tell the truth and not be able to take out a loan. Suppose he decides to lie. ...read more.


As well as this Kant's view of human reason can differ from others. David Hume believed that reason should be subordinate to emotions, wants and desires of the individual 'reason is and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them' whereas for Kant, it is the other way around. Another weakness is the difference between the absolute and relative position. Kant takes up the absolute position and does not consider the circumstances and how they can affect humans. He differs from Aristotle, who was interested in virtue ethics, which suggests that you should build on virtues and end up as a better person. Lastly, John Stuart Mill argues that Kant does not have a concern for the consequences of an action and asks if something can really be classed as morally right if it results in the death of thousands of people even if the person thought he was acting out of good will. In conclusion Kant's principle is a humanitarian one. Kant argues that if we use reason to determine our actions then we are less likely to be swayed by conflicting circumstances. We would all be governed by the principles of 'universal law' and 'the end in itself' and shall treat others as human beings worthy of respect. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    outrageous, but the utilitarian view that everyone counts as one appears to promote such an action. However, note that in practice, altruistic acts help many more people and hurt many fewer than sadistic ones do, and so utilitarianism almost always condemns sadism and sanctions altruism.

  2. Examine the key features of situation ethics, and the main criticisms of it, and ...

    If it were the case that agape could always be fairly and accurately dealt out, then laws would be redundant. As it is, there are no such guarantees, and so a degree of law is necessary for human survival. Barclay believes that law is essential for a variety of reasons:

  1. Business Ethics

    Each of the major professional association for accountants has a code of ethics. Although ethical standards in accounting were always an issue in business the general public did not really pay attention to the issue in hand. Nevertheless recent events have brought the issues to the publics' attention, because some companies have not used full disclosure in their financial reporting.

  2. A) Clarify the key features of a deontological theory of ethics

    law-making member of a kingdom of ends' A hypothetical imperative, unlike the categorical is used as a means to an end and comes with an 'if' clause, an example being 'you should exercise IF you wish to get fitter.'

  1. Kantian Ethics and Universal Maxims

    Such a maxim, therefore, would be self-defeating. Kant argued that lying was always wrong. We would not reasonably want lying to become a universal law - people would quickly learn not to trust anybody and there would be chaos. If a lie is to become successful, people must believe that

  2. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    Korsgaard affirms and defends this Kantian view. For her, the notion of autonomy and categorical imperative is the synthesis of the various elements found in voluntarism (notion of moral law), realism (law-providing reason for action), and reflective endorsement (providing reflection authority over the person). Kantian moral constructivism is said to be a source of normativity on obligation.

  1. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    and do not dedicate their life to God, natural moral law does fail to be a practical theory because we do not have a purpose in life to achieve union with God. Aquinas made an assumption that God created the world for a purpose however many people would reject this premise in the 21st century.

  2. Explain the theory of Virtue Ethics

    However there is no difference between the virtues of a community and individuals within that community, the supreme happiness that Aristotle talks about is one for the community, and not just and individual. MacIntyre suggests that philosophy is too far removed from ordinary life and said that it is not

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work