• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kant's theory of Ethics

Extracts from this document...


` Kant and the Deontological Argument Immanuel Kant was born in Konigsberg, East Prussia, 1724, and died in 1804 and so, was alive during much of the 18th Century. One of his most important pieces of work was the development of his own theory of ethics, which aimed to prove that ethics should be based on reason. That is why Kant's theory is considered to be of a deontological nature. The historical context of the 18th Century is important when trying to realise why Kant came up with his particular ethical theory based on reason. This period of time is named the 'Enlightenment Period' during which there was increased recognition of the need for the development of an ethical theory based on reason, and reason alone. Kant was, to a great extent, influenced by German pietism i.e. the view that religion should be based on human experience rather than study or rational proof. He stands as part of the 'European Enlightenment', the movement that aimed to go beyond authority and superstition so as to deal with morality based solely on human reason. In its basics, Kant's moral theory is deontological, meaning it rests on the concept of duty or obligation (derived from the Greek word 'ontos' meaning duty/obligation). Kant argues we should handle our affairs through duty to the moral law. Kant starts off by arguing that reason is the primary source of knowledge. ...read more.


This is in contrast to the 'hypothetical imperative', which is not absolute. The hypothetical imperative is characterised by the word 'if' 'IF you want to gain praise, you should help people' whereas the categorical imperative is characterised by the word 'ought' 'you OUGHT to follow the categorical imperative because it is the moral law'. The categorical imperative is not dependent on anyone's desire to make it an imperative; it is binding not just in some situations and for certain people, but always, for everyone. There are three formulations of Kant's categorical imperative. The first is 'The Formula of Universal Law'. This states 'Act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a universal law' (Fundamental Principles, page 38) that is to say, whatever moral law we choose to guide our actions, the law must make rational sense when universalised. In this case we can use the example of 'The False Promise'. A man is forced to take out a loan. He knows he will not be able to repay it but he knows that he will not get the loan if he does not promise to repay the money. He does not know whether to take the money and lie, or tell the truth and not be able to take out a loan. Suppose he decides to lie. ...read more.


As well as this Kant's view of human reason can differ from others. David Hume believed that reason should be subordinate to emotions, wants and desires of the individual 'reason is and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them' whereas for Kant, it is the other way around. Another weakness is the difference between the absolute and relative position. Kant takes up the absolute position and does not consider the circumstances and how they can affect humans. He differs from Aristotle, who was interested in virtue ethics, which suggests that you should build on virtues and end up as a better person. Lastly, John Stuart Mill argues that Kant does not have a concern for the consequences of an action and asks if something can really be classed as morally right if it results in the death of thousands of people even if the person thought he was acting out of good will. In conclusion Kant's principle is a humanitarian one. Kant argues that if we use reason to determine our actions then we are less likely to be swayed by conflicting circumstances. We would all be governed by the principles of 'universal law' and 'the end in itself' and shall treat others as human beings worthy of respect. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. A) Clarify the key features of a deontological theory of ethics

    be killed, deontology would prevent the lives of the ten being saved and all would be killed together. As such, despite the equality being perceived as a strength, it can be described as a weakness in others. There is also support for using duty as the motive of an action.

  2. Examine the distinguishing features of a deontological ethical theory.

    The first of these strengths is that it takes into account justice. Many see this as it corrects the utilitarian presumption that the punishment of an innocent man is acceptable if the majority are gaining the most happiness. In Kant's theory the morality of an action does not come from

  1. Examine the key features of situation ethics, and the main criticisms of it, and ...

    that the most important commandment is to love God and love your neighbour. Hr also said that love and justice are the same, and love is justice distributed, that love is not liking and always wills the neighbour's good and that situation ethics is a teleological theory that identifies the

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    It is, if you like, content-free. All that it requires of us is the duty to examine any rule or maxim (which we may wish to recommend or adopt) in the light of the non-contradictory and universal logic of the moral law.

  1. Business Ethics

    * Most amoral managers today are unintentional, there may still exist a few who simply do not see a role for ethics in business or management decision making (Carroll, 1987). Fortunately, intentional amoral managers are a vanishing breed. (Robert Frederick, 2002, A companion to business ethics, Wiley- Blackwell)

  2. Kantian Ethics and Universal Maxims

    maxim would be: 'Whenever you need a loan, promise to repay it, even though you know you cannot do so.' Could this maxim become a universal law? No, says Kant. If it did, people would no longer believe each other and nobody would lend money.

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    In five years the total dollar cost was $3,750,000; 900 patients were treated at a cost of $4,166.65 each. For the same amount 20,000 outpatients could have been treated per year, or 100,000 altogether. Or, a screening program could have been set up in East Harlem to detect lead poisoning

  2. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    but Aquinas assumes our final cause is to achieve communion with God. As Jean-Paul Sartre said ?man creates his own values and determines a meaning to his life, for in the beginning the human being does not possess any identity or value?, there is no need for a God to give us a purpose in life.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work