• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kantian ethics.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chris Acton October, 2001 Kantian ethics. Immanual Kant Immanual Kant was born in 1724 and lived until the age of 80. He was the son of a saddler, and he was born in K�nigsberg in East Prussia. After leaving the university he spent a number of years in private tutoring, but taking his master's degree in 1755, he settled to teach a variety of subjects as Privatdozent. In 1770 he was appointed to the chair of logic and metaphysics at K�ningsberg. It was after this that he entered on his greatest, "critical" period. He never left K�ningsberg, and he never married. His aim was to make morality a fact like science from a deontological point of view. He says that acting from a sense of duty is good, and acting on that duty is absolutely good. He says that having a good will is more important than the consequences of the act so doing ones duty is always moral because it is a good will. Kant says one should do their duty for no reason other than it being their duty. I think he says this because if you are doing your duty, which is moral, therefore, a good thing, it can't be morally wrong? ...read more.

Middle

Categorical imperatives are the product of reason and you ought to do such and such, regardless of what you want. It is an absolute duty that ignores our emotions. To illustrate this imperative you could imagine a person needing to borrow money, and promising to repay it even though they know they cant. The maxim for this would be: "Whenever you need money borrow it and promise to repay it even though you know you cant." This rule couldn't be universalized because if it was, people wouldn't believe anyone and nobody would ever lend money, even to people who may repay the money. Kant says this rule doesn't work because of the bad consequences but instead he simply says it doesn't work. Lying is an ethical dilemma because sometimes it may bring out more good for a greater number of people than if the lie was not told. He says that lying is always wrong because it couldn't be universalized. There would be no trust between anyone and if a lie is to be successful then it must be believed to be true, so if there was a universal law it would never work anyway. ...read more.

Conclusion

Kant ignores the fact we have emotions and this is obvious because he thinks all human life is equal. I don't know how he can say that he would save the person closest to him no matter who the people were. He thinks we are almost robots. He also says that consequences do not matter but the act of a rational person is based upon the consequences that the act produces. So how can he ignore consequences and have a totally duty based theory. He contradicts himself. For example if a CRAZY gunman wants some friends of mine and they are hiding in my cellar, what do I do if the gunman knocks on my door? Do I tell the truth like a rational person and let them die or do I tell a lie to save lives? Well, Kant says that if I tell a lie, no matter what the consequences are, I am not rationale. So telling the truth and letting them die is the rational thing to do. Kant wants the world to be perfect and wants everyone to follow his theory, and in an imperfect world, his theory sound unconvincing when we look at some dilemmas. His theory is great but not in practice. ?? ?? ?? ?? Chris Acton Kant essay 20/04/07 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    maximises the good, but most people don't think a problem through thoroughly before acting - indeed some people believe that facing a full moon whilst holding horseshoes is a cure for cancer. Thus, making utilitarianism a tangible and applicable theory seems very taxing, so usually the extent of attainable calculations

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    not keeping his promise, the promise itself would become impossible, as well as the end that one might have in view in it, since no one would consider that anything was promised to him, but would ridicule all such statements as vain pretences'.

  1. Business Ethics

    the situation, a crisis of confidence will soon emerged (Cenker and Madison (1996). In Japan, Chou Audit Corporation was charged in court for failing to detect "window dressing" practice of Yamaichi Securities - a stock-broking firm that went bust in 1997.

  2. Kant's theory of Ethics

    Kant believed that a 'good' or 'pure' motive is dependent on the autonomous decision of an individual to commit him/herself to a universal moral law, which is binding on every human.

  1. Kantian Ethics and Universal Maxims

    others are telling the truth; so the success of a lie depends on there not being a 'universal law' permitting it. Kant argues that it is never right to treat people as mere means to an end. We are always ends in ourselves, and because of this we are all holy.

  2. Philosophy and Ethics: A look at Confucianism and Taoism and their Affects on the ...

    Thus, similar to Buddhism, birth and death are not seen as the beginning and the end. Rather, life is seen as existence without limit and continuity without a specific starting point: the soul never dies and remains eternal. As a result, when an individual passes away, the soul is not reborn, rather it migrates into another human form.

  1. "Environmental policy can't be based solely on efficiency arguments. Issues of ethics are at ...

    The utilitarian approach to life as put across by Odoevsky, who states that "utility is an essential driving force of all human actions," (A. Frolova 1998) it is said to be the driving force for all laws, legislations, activities and morals.

  2. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    Korsgaard affirms and defends this Kantian view. For her, the notion of autonomy and categorical imperative is the synthesis of the various elements found in voluntarism (notion of moral law), realism (law-providing reason for action), and reflective endorsement (providing reflection authority over the person). Kantian moral constructivism is said to be a source of normativity on obligation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work