• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kantian ethics.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chris Acton October, 2001 Kantian ethics. Immanual Kant Immanual Kant was born in 1724 and lived until the age of 80. He was the son of a saddler, and he was born in K�nigsberg in East Prussia. After leaving the university he spent a number of years in private tutoring, but taking his master's degree in 1755, he settled to teach a variety of subjects as Privatdozent. In 1770 he was appointed to the chair of logic and metaphysics at K�ningsberg. It was after this that he entered on his greatest, "critical" period. He never left K�ningsberg, and he never married. His aim was to make morality a fact like science from a deontological point of view. He says that acting from a sense of duty is good, and acting on that duty is absolutely good. He says that having a good will is more important than the consequences of the act so doing ones duty is always moral because it is a good will. Kant says one should do their duty for no reason other than it being their duty. I think he says this because if you are doing your duty, which is moral, therefore, a good thing, it can't be morally wrong? ...read more.

Middle

Categorical imperatives are the product of reason and you ought to do such and such, regardless of what you want. It is an absolute duty that ignores our emotions. To illustrate this imperative you could imagine a person needing to borrow money, and promising to repay it even though they know they cant. The maxim for this would be: "Whenever you need money borrow it and promise to repay it even though you know you cant." This rule couldn't be universalized because if it was, people wouldn't believe anyone and nobody would ever lend money, even to people who may repay the money. Kant says this rule doesn't work because of the bad consequences but instead he simply says it doesn't work. Lying is an ethical dilemma because sometimes it may bring out more good for a greater number of people than if the lie was not told. He says that lying is always wrong because it couldn't be universalized. There would be no trust between anyone and if a lie is to be successful then it must be believed to be true, so if there was a universal law it would never work anyway. ...read more.

Conclusion

Kant ignores the fact we have emotions and this is obvious because he thinks all human life is equal. I don't know how he can say that he would save the person closest to him no matter who the people were. He thinks we are almost robots. He also says that consequences do not matter but the act of a rational person is based upon the consequences that the act produces. So how can he ignore consequences and have a totally duty based theory. He contradicts himself. For example if a CRAZY gunman wants some friends of mine and they are hiding in my cellar, what do I do if the gunman knocks on my door? Do I tell the truth like a rational person and let them die or do I tell a lie to save lives? Well, Kant says that if I tell a lie, no matter what the consequences are, I am not rationale. So telling the truth and letting them die is the rational thing to do. Kant wants the world to be perfect and wants everyone to follow his theory, and in an imperfect world, his theory sound unconvincing when we look at some dilemmas. His theory is great but not in practice. ?? ?? ?? ?? Chris Acton Kant essay 20/04/07 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    exists as pros and cons, such as "she will be much happier if I tell her a flattering lie - but on the other hand, if she later discovers the truth she will be very unhappy. Therefore, I should tell the truth in the first place."

  2. Kant's theory of Ethics

    This underpins the Human Rights Act, which suggests that all humans have intrinsic worth simply because of our freedom and rational nature. The third formulation is entitled 'The Formula of the Kingdom of Ends' 'Every rational being must so act as if he were by his maxims in every case

  1. Kantian Ethics and Universal Maxims

    Such a maxim, therefore, would be self-defeating. Kant argued that lying was always wrong. We would not reasonably want lying to become a universal law - people would quickly learn not to trust anybody and there would be chaos. If a lie is to become successful, people must believe that

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    His motive for acting in the way that he does is, therefore, pure. It is unconditional. He does not do it in order to get increased trade but simply because he thinks that he ought so to act. Two things need to be said.

  1. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    If it presented head first, the skull was pierced with an iron poker, the brain scooped out, the skull crushed, and the rest of the body removed. In case of a breech birth, pieces of the fetus were removed one by one with various hooks, blades, and grippers.[Note 2] I

  2. "Environmental policy can't be based solely on efficiency arguments. Issues of ethics are at ...

    In different aspects of environmental policy, these different definitions of efficiency hold true, though it is clear that they all have the same thing in mind when referring to efficiency. As it Stands, Utilitarianism (the theory of Jeremy Bentham) is an example of efficiency if it were to be applied to policy.

  1. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    will never determined by some external law or principle, and that it only accords with its own law, and shows that this law, which is the categorical imperative, is the law of free will. This categorical imperative does not impose any external constraint on the free will's activities but arises from the nature of the will.

  2. Philosophy and Ethics: A look at Confucianism and Taoism and their Affects on the ...

    Quiescence is a form of philosophical inaction and is of utmost importance to Taoism. According to Lao-Tzu, quiescence is the mark of the intellectual person and an example of this is if something bad, like an earthquake or a first-degree murder, Lao-Tzu argues that it is best to let the event take its natural course.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work