• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kantian ethics.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chris Acton October, 2001 Kantian ethics. Immanual Kant Immanual Kant was born in 1724 and lived until the age of 80. He was the son of a saddler, and he was born in Knigsberg in East Prussia. After leaving the university he spent a number of years in private tutoring, but taking his master's degree in 1755, he settled to teach a variety of subjects as Privatdozent. In 1770 he was appointed to the chair of logic and metaphysics at Kningsberg. It was after this that he entered on his greatest, "critical" period. He never left Kningsberg, and he never married. His aim was to make morality a fact like science from a deontological point of view. He says that acting from a sense of duty is good, and acting on that duty is absolutely good. He says that having a good will is more important than the consequences of the act so doing ones duty is always moral because it is a good will. Kant says one should do their duty for no reason other than it being their duty. I think he says this because if you are doing your duty, which is moral, therefore, a good thing, it can't be morally wrong? ...read more.

Middle

Categorical imperatives are the product of reason and you ought to do such and such, regardless of what you want. It is an absolute duty that ignores our emotions. To illustrate this imperative you could imagine a person needing to borrow money, and promising to repay it even though they know they cant. The maxim for this would be: "Whenever you need money borrow it and promise to repay it even though you know you cant." This rule couldn't be universalized because if it was, people wouldn't believe anyone and nobody would ever lend money, even to people who may repay the money. Kant says this rule doesn't work because of the bad consequences but instead he simply says it doesn't work. Lying is an ethical dilemma because sometimes it may bring out more good for a greater number of people than if the lie was not told. He says that lying is always wrong because it couldn't be universalized. There would be no trust between anyone and if a lie is to be successful then it must be believed to be true, so if there was a universal law it would never work anyway. ...read more.

Conclusion

Kant ignores the fact we have emotions and this is obvious because he thinks all human life is equal. I don't know how he can say that he would save the person closest to him no matter who the people were. He thinks we are almost robots. He also says that consequences do not matter but the act of a rational person is based upon the consequences that the act produces. So how can he ignore consequences and have a totally duty based theory. He contradicts himself. For example if a CRAZY gunman wants some friends of mine and they are hiding in my cellar, what do I do if the gunman knocks on my door? Do I tell the truth like a rational person and let them die or do I tell a lie to save lives? Well, Kant says that if I tell a lie, no matter what the consequences are, I am not rationale. So telling the truth and letting them die is the rational thing to do. Kant wants the world to be perfect and wants everyone to follow his theory, and in an imperfect world, his theory sound unconvincing when we look at some dilemmas. His theory is great but not in practice. ?? ?? ?? ?? Chris Acton Kant essay 20/04/07 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Kant's theory of Ethics

    One may argue that this is a sensible decision but Kant would argue that even if the shopkeeper is not cheating her customers the action is still morally wrong because she is only doing it to achieve good consequences for herself.

  2. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    Utilitarianism looks intuitively attractive because the right thing to do is what will do the most good, promoting others' happiness and well being, and preventing suffering. Happiness is concieved of as the ultimate good; we may wonder what we want money or fame for, but not what happiness is for.

  1. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    Autonomous and Heteronomous Will It is clear why Kant makes much of the will - the part of the mind which gives impetus to our actions. The truly rational and truly free will is to be distinguished from the rationally constrained and morally fettered will.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    The argument against SL is detailed in Section 3. In Section 4 I consider the risks of putting QL into practice. Section 1. The Sanctity of Life Position What does it mean to attribute sanctity -as opposed to very great value- to a life?

  1. Philosophy and Ethics: A look at Confucianism and Taoism and their Affects on the ...

    Thus, to follow Lao's ideals one should disregard action and everything will be all right. Thus, being the modern standard of an "intellectual" or "learned person" according to Lao endangers the delicate balance between thinking and refusing to think. One who is an intellectual is thus have an imbalance because they think too much.

  2. Kantian Ethics and Universal Maxims

    The debt collectors are threatening action. The man asks himself whether he should borrow money from his friend to get the debt collectors to leave him alone, knowing that he will not be able to repay his friend. If he were to go down this path and borrow money, his

  1. "Environmental policy can't be based solely on efficiency arguments. Issues of ethics are at ...

    In different aspects of environmental policy, these different definitions of efficiency hold true, though it is clear that they all have the same thing in mind when referring to efficiency. As it Stands, Utilitarianism (the theory of Jeremy Bentham) is an example of efficiency if it were to be applied to policy.

  2. Is Christ a Kantian?

    How would I ever know how am I to live today i.e. to listen to music or to spend the day helping in an old folk's home? Who can give me the exact number of times I should practice virtue for this week?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work