• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kantian ethics.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chris Acton October, 2001 Kantian ethics. Immanual Kant Immanual Kant was born in 1724 and lived until the age of 80. He was the son of a saddler, and he was born in K�nigsberg in East Prussia. After leaving the university he spent a number of years in private tutoring, but taking his master's degree in 1755, he settled to teach a variety of subjects as Privatdozent. In 1770 he was appointed to the chair of logic and metaphysics at K�ningsberg. It was after this that he entered on his greatest, "critical" period. He never left K�ningsberg, and he never married. His aim was to make morality a fact like science from a deontological point of view. He says that acting from a sense of duty is good, and acting on that duty is absolutely good. He says that having a good will is more important than the consequences of the act so doing ones duty is always moral because it is a good will. Kant says one should do their duty for no reason other than it being their duty. I think he says this because if you are doing your duty, which is moral, therefore, a good thing, it can't be morally wrong? ...read more.

Middle

Categorical imperatives are the product of reason and you ought to do such and such, regardless of what you want. It is an absolute duty that ignores our emotions. To illustrate this imperative you could imagine a person needing to borrow money, and promising to repay it even though they know they cant. The maxim for this would be: "Whenever you need money borrow it and promise to repay it even though you know you cant." This rule couldn't be universalized because if it was, people wouldn't believe anyone and nobody would ever lend money, even to people who may repay the money. Kant says this rule doesn't work because of the bad consequences but instead he simply says it doesn't work. Lying is an ethical dilemma because sometimes it may bring out more good for a greater number of people than if the lie was not told. He says that lying is always wrong because it couldn't be universalized. There would be no trust between anyone and if a lie is to be successful then it must be believed to be true, so if there was a universal law it would never work anyway. ...read more.

Conclusion

Kant ignores the fact we have emotions and this is obvious because he thinks all human life is equal. I don't know how he can say that he would save the person closest to him no matter who the people were. He thinks we are almost robots. He also says that consequences do not matter but the act of a rational person is based upon the consequences that the act produces. So how can he ignore consequences and have a totally duty based theory. He contradicts himself. For example if a CRAZY gunman wants some friends of mine and they are hiding in my cellar, what do I do if the gunman knocks on my door? Do I tell the truth like a rational person and let them die or do I tell a lie to save lives? Well, Kant says that if I tell a lie, no matter what the consequences are, I am not rationale. So telling the truth and letting them die is the rational thing to do. Kant wants the world to be perfect and wants everyone to follow his theory, and in an imperfect world, his theory sound unconvincing when we look at some dilemmas. His theory is great but not in practice. ?? ?? ?? ?? Chris Acton Kant essay 20/04/07 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    exists as pros and cons, such as "she will be much happier if I tell her a flattering lie - but on the other hand, if she later discovers the truth she will be very unhappy. Therefore, I should tell the truth in the first place."

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    This is clear to see. If these two negative maxims - do not bother to tell the truth or to keep a promise - were to be universalised, then truth-telling and promise-keeping would soon fall into disuse. No one would believe anyone.

  1. Kant's theory of Ethics

    If everyone made promises they could not keep, then the act of 'promising' itself would be impossible, as no one would believe your promise and laugh at any such utterances as vain pretences. Kant believes we should only live by those maxims that would still make sense when universalised, to include all people.

  2. Business Ethics

    The public expects and needs to be assured that accountants do their jobs diligently and with conscience that what they (the accountants) do is to serve them (the public). In short, what accountants need to understand is that doing their job well will not only benefits the organization they served, but also the economy as a whole.

  1. Kantian Ethics and Universal Maxims

    For Kant, human reason is the key and by making laws for ourselves based on reason we become 'law-abiding members of a kingdom of ends' - a community in which the laws adopted by all the individuals will be in harmony, with disagreements sorted out by reasoned argument.

  2. Philosophy and Ethics: A look at Confucianism and Taoism and their Affects on the ...

    Thus, similar to Buddhism, birth and death are not seen as the beginning and the end. Rather, life is seen as existence without limit and continuity without a specific starting point: the soul never dies and remains eternal. As a result, when an individual passes away, the soul is not reborn, rather it migrates into another human form.

  1. "Environmental policy can't be based solely on efficiency arguments. Issues of ethics are at ...

    Valdimir Odoevsky, "one of the most brilliant and influential representatives of progressive thought [in Russia]" (A. Frolova 1998) of his time, produced a development of the utilitarian theory of J. Bentham, which is illustrated in Alla Frolova's article 'Ecological reasoning: Ethical alternatives'.

  2. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    Korsgaard affirms and defends this Kantian view. For her, the notion of autonomy and categorical imperative is the synthesis of the various elements found in voluntarism (notion of moral law), realism (law-providing reason for action), and reflective endorsement (providing reflection authority over the person). Kantian moral constructivism is said to be a source of normativity on obligation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work