• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kants Theory cannot be used to make decisions about abortion. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Kant?s Theory cannot be used to make decisions about abortion I will be discussing the above statement by discussing the reasons in support of the statement and reasons that are not in support of the statement Firstly some may say that Kant?s theory cannot be used to make decisions about abortion as Kant does not recognise moral dilemmas. A dictionary definition of a moral dilemma is this - ?A moral dilemma is a complex situation that often involves an apparent mental conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgressing another?. ...read more.


By contrast others may disagree with the above statement as they believe that by using Kant?s theory they will be able to make a straight forward decision which does not involve emotions and confusion to contribute to the decision made. Kant believed that all moral decisions could be made from his ideas about categorical imperatives: ?Act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a universal law?, in other words, if you want to decide whether an act is morally good, then you should be able to see if everyone else would do that act in the same way (if the act is universal). ...read more.


Kant?s reasoning behind his ideas would be that if it?s right or wrong for one person it should be right or wrong for everyone. So by looking at it this way people will be able to make the correct decision without the need to confine to emotions. In conclusion I believe that Kant theory can be useful but only to a certain extent. This is because if it can be applied to make moral decisions without the factor of emotions to contribute to it, however when looking at something such as abortion which is so controversial and emotional it is very hard to consolidate to only Kant?s reasoning?s. Shobika Gomahan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain Kant's ethical theory

    even though he is aware that he will not be able to the maxim of his action would be "Whenever I am in need of money, I will borrow and promise to pay it back, though I know that this will not be done."

  2. Examine the Strengths and Weaknesses of Kants Ethical Theory

    So it is too rigid, deontological and absolute. Another weakness of this theory is how it fails to accommodate human emotion. 'The law of love is the ultimate law' (Joseph Fletcher) this theory demands that laws be put first above al humans so people will see this as an weakness as it doesn't always seek the well being off others.

  1. Absolutism is a more useful tool to make moral decisions than relativism. Discuss.

    This is called Subjectivism which is another ethical theory. It could be argued that Absolutism can be very useful. It is a "universal code" which someone could use to decide whether something is right or wrong. It can be used very easy to apply as there are no technicalities about it- far easier to apply than relativism All someone

  2. “Without real freedom there would be no ethical decisions to make,” Discuss.

    In a situation like this the responsibility for what was apparently consciously taken ethical action would be left with the physical and conscious self to deal with, whereas the action was taken by the subconscious, as a natural reaction or other phenomena.

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    Subjective ends Kant defines as any that we take only for ourselves, by inclination or desire etc. Objective ends are those which are willed universally for all, and which serve as the 'for-the-sake-of-which' of all actions. The third (Kingdom of ends)

  2. Give an account of Kants theory of ethics.

    This is because consequences could have come about without meaning to in an action, which was meant to be bad, or cause harm. The second kind was called Categorical Imperatives. These principles were absolute in the process of moral reasoning and could be applied anywhere and at anytime.

  1. Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality

    includes the predicate (female). Analytic statements are necessarily true, they must be true because their truth depends on the way words are used and it simply would not make sense to say they were not true.

  2. To what extent, if at all, should conscience be ignored when making ethical decisions?

    these 'absolute pacifists' would argue that it would be better to accept physical harm rather than defend oneself against acts of violence with aggression. The vast majority would disagree with this course of action, stating a right to self- defence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work