• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kants Theory cannot be used to make decisions about abortion. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kant?s Theory cannot be used to make decisions about abortion I will be discussing the above statement by discussing the reasons in support of the statement and reasons that are not in support of the statement Firstly some may say that Kant?s theory cannot be used to make decisions about abortion as Kant does not recognise moral dilemmas. A dictionary definition of a moral dilemma is this - ?A moral dilemma is a complex situation that often involves an apparent mental conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgressing another?. ...read more.

Middle

By contrast others may disagree with the above statement as they believe that by using Kant?s theory they will be able to make a straight forward decision which does not involve emotions and confusion to contribute to the decision made. Kant believed that all moral decisions could be made from his ideas about categorical imperatives: ?Act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a universal law?, in other words, if you want to decide whether an act is morally good, then you should be able to see if everyone else would do that act in the same way (if the act is universal). ...read more.

Conclusion

Kant?s reasoning behind his ideas would be that if it?s right or wrong for one person it should be right or wrong for everyone. So by looking at it this way people will be able to make the correct decision without the need to confine to emotions. In conclusion I believe that Kant theory can be useful but only to a certain extent. This is because if it can be applied to make moral decisions without the factor of emotions to contribute to it, however when looking at something such as abortion which is so controversial and emotional it is very hard to consolidate to only Kant?s reasoning?s. Shobika Gomahan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain Kant's ethical theory

    even though he is aware that he will not be able to the maxim of his action would be "Whenever I am in need of money, I will borrow and promise to pay it back, though I know that this will not be done."

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    Then I see at once that it could never hold as a universal law of nature, but would necessarily contradict itself. For supposing it to be a universal law that everyone when he thinks himself in a difficulty should be able to promise whatever he pleases, with the purpose of

  1. Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality

    Thus a good will seems to constitute the indispensable condition of being even worthy of happiness." -Kant ,Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, 1785 Kant wants to place good will at the very centre of his ethics, and in doing so, he was to go beyond anything that had been written before.

  2. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    Subjective ends Kant defines as any that we take only for ourselves, by inclination or desire etc. Objective ends are those which are willed universally for all, and which serve as the 'for-the-sake-of-which' of all actions. The third (Kingdom of ends)

  1. To what extent, if at all, should conscience be ignored when making ethical decisions?

    and use of conscience, this was explicitly stated in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights (1948), in Article 18 and further emphasised, more recently, in The Human Rights Act (1998), in Article 9.

  2. Absolutism is a more useful tool to make moral decisions than relativism. Discuss.

    The only specifically absolutist rule is "follow the good and avoid the evil"- meaning that they base their absolute decisions on what they deem to be good or evil. The use of evidence to decide whether something is right or wrong is called objectivism.

  1. What are the strengths of Kants moral theory?

    The phenomenal realm is occupied by animals and humans. However whilst humans are physically in the phenomenal realm there mental state is closer to the noumenal realm because humans are not controlled by desires, unlike animals, and think rationally. Through this humans have been recognised as different from animals as

  2. Explain Kants understanding of universal maxims. Can they be applied to Euthanasia?

    2. Treat human?s as ends in themselves. 3. Act as if you live in a kingdom of ends. Universalisation means that the moral laws must be applied in all situations and to all people, at all times. If an action is right for one, it is right for everyone.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work