• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Liberalism puts too much emphasis on freedom at the expense of other values." Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Liberalism puts too much emphasis on freedom at the expense of other values." Discuss Liberalism, a word that contains the idea of liberty in its very name, is accordingly an ideology or group of ideologies which value human freedom, and seek to promote this value in a political context. Different forms of liberalism can have both different conceptions of freedom, and different views on how liberty is best promoted and preserved, and the political systems which should be employed to bring this about. Whether liberalism emphasises freedom at the expense of other values, then, is dependent upon what kind of liberalism one is criticising and what kind of freedom this liberalism advocates. It also depends on what "other" values one finds important and whether these are sacrificed in the interest of individual liberty. Classical Liberalism places the highest value upon the freedom of the individual, and sees the state as existing solely to guarantee man's "natural rights" of life, liberty and property. ...read more.

Middle

The "freedom to", positive freedoms, are not recognised by classical liberals, and thus individuals whose conditions are manifestly unfree would be considered free nonetheless. The conception of individual liberty as something more than securing from threat one's "natural rights" is something one finds in other forms of liberalism. The main value which underpins utilitarian liberalism is not freedom at all, but the value of "the greatest happiness". John Stuart Mill views the greatest happiness as being best achieved by allowing the individual the maximum liberty which can be maintained (and still fulfil the greatest happiness principle). This is because the development of the "higher pleasures" of the person - intellectual refinement etc - is dependent upon a degree of freedom of thought, expression and action, because humans are generally unhappy as slaves. Utilitarian liberalism does not entirely ignore other values then, since liberty is seen to an extent as a means to an end rather than an end in itself, but it does emphasise freedom to a large extent. ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition, every form of liberalism aims to maximise freedom in some sense, and there are still a diverse range of methods for obtaining it. This is because, as we have seen, there are different views on what actually constitutes freedom: whether it is merely the absence of a constraint by the state, or whether it involves informal social and economic relationships. Freedom could be constructed from a set of different values - equality, security and order, opportunity to develop oneself and share thoughts and experiences with others, participation in the government of oneself and one's society. Although liberalism as a whole tends to take the individual out of social contexts and above humanity on the social level, the value of freedom, and thus some kind of liberalism (most probably a social liberalism, rather than classical liberalism which from today's perspective could be seen as harsh) can be a coherent and just combination of various ideals for the construction of a just society which maintains the integrity and rights of the person. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    Like Mill, Nietzsche valued individualism above all else, but he saw that as a result of the acquiescence to social and political tyranny (e.g. religion) followed a "herd mentality" where everybody follows one another for fear of disapproval by public opinion, or in the case of religion, disapproval by God.

  2. Our freedom to make ethical choices is an illusion Discuss

    Although he believed that freedom to make choices were illusions he argued that it was not the end for moral responsibility. Libetarianists would argue against that freedom is an illusion and it is not the case that all events have a cause; some events are uncaused such as human decisions and choices.

  1. What are Mill’s four main arguments in defence of freedom of speech?

    Another weakness is that the argument is based on a single example which is itself based on anecdotal evidence. From a logical point of view it may not be that this hypocrisy was as widespread or pernicious as Mill, a humanist, portrayed it, and if this is the case it again removes much of the strength of Mill's point.

  2. We do not possess any genuine freedom to act ethically Discuss

    In Catholicism, 7 years is the usual time that a child will experience their first confession and Holy Communion. We must however, when looking at this argument consider the fact that if we are to believe in Free Will, that a person no matter what their upbringing and social conditioning,

  1. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    IVF facilitates such practices as exterminating 'undesirable' traits from our genetic makeup. It is also argued that the medical ethic (of alleviating a situation) is by-passed because the infertility of the parents is never actually treated. They are merely given a way to circumvent the problem.

  2. What are the limitations on our personal liberty? Are all of them justified?

    in a more popular act (to use his example, a person playing sport), or a situation where both parties are not consenting (parental chastisement, a situation in which written law is just as subjective). Also, an interesting fact is that although the European Court of Human Rights ruled that there

  1. Social Contract

    the airport I would have to abide by the road rules lest I wish to be arrested. Even if Hobbes is correct in saying that there is no actual contract, we are left with why should we honour the agreement?

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    party is elected to government must keep these people happy in order to have any chance of being re-elected. Therefore they, not we, have all the control, we are just the tools that they use to achieve their ends by censoring what we see and hear such that we will

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work