• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Life after death and problem of evil

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Life after death solves the problem of evil. Discuss. The problem of evil is how can an omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient God exist in the face of both moral and natural evil? One theory proposed to defend classical theism is the existence of a life after death. If evil can be justified through punishment and eternal gain, surely there is no problem? There are however, many problems with this argument with criticisms come extensively from non-Christians. The best way to analyse if life after death does solve the problem of evil is to look at it on the basis of two variables: the existence of life after death, the existence of evil and how the three main views combining these variables would answer this question. For a life after death to solve the problem of evil, both must exist. This is an assumption with little proof beyond that of faith, which is why it often only appeals to Christians. Augustine was a key believer in both, he believed that on judgement day those who had sinned would go to hell and those who had not would go to heaven. ...read more.

Middle

This is the view of many atheists, and those Christians who take a more liberal approach to the bible (as it specifically states heaven, a literal Christian would take this as word). As D Z Philips states, a life after death is just the misinterpretation of language and should not be taken as fact. This is one of the few areas where science and religion have a common outlook. One of the fundamental principles of science is that energy cannot be destroyed. If we take the definition of life in an open way, then in fact life after death does exist through energy, just not in the way we our thought to believe. Other theorists such as Hume argue firmly against the existence of life after death. While agnostic, he is a firm believer in the idea of proof. Faith and written word is not enough to prove the existence of God or a life after death, therefore until it can be scientifically proved a life after death does not exist. They key criticism of Hume is can you objectively say that evil exists? ...read more.

Conclusion

Perhaps this is why Pascal's wager works, it is better to believe in a God in case he does exist, than to not believe in one at all. In conclusion, to agree that life after death solves the problem of evil requires the belief that both exist. It is a lot more logical to believe that evil exists, as despite the claims of God's greater plans, or even the scientific version of the larger picture for society, it is clear that some forms of evil will always override these claims. The existence of a life after death is a lot harder to appreciate as a non-Christian. As a firm believer in the idea of proof, I agree with Hume that until it can be proved it does not exist. I do however, I also agree with the idea of an alternative life after death, specifically the idea of energy always existing. It is interesting to see how two very religious originating ideas as evil and heaven can both become ideas that hold true in ideologies outside that of Christianity, and also too in science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. Literary Criticism of Uncle Tom's Cabin [Psychological Lense].

    Stowe's religious views were imprinted into her mind and soul, and they set a path for her. Her path was to enlighten the southerners that agreed with slavery and were cruel to the people they held captive to do their bidding.

  2. The Ideas of Hell and Purgatory: A Wide Shift from Then to Now.

    The Doctrine of Purgatory was established at the Councils of Florence (1438-1443) and Trent (1545-1563). The basic outcomes were that purgatory exists, and that "prayers of the faithful" will help purge a soul to heaven ("Purgatory: History and Current Beliefs").

  1. The Synoptic Problem

    He believed that Q comprised of 230 verses which were true sayings of Jesus. Source Q provides us with evidence for the similarities that occur between Luke and Matthew that Mark cannot account for.

  2. To get to heaven you must behave morally. Discuss.

    And without proof both are making very bold statements that criticise people's purposes for living and many Christians would disagree with their theories. The statement also implies that behaving morally is a direct commandment or creation of God's. The anthropologist Feuerbach argues that morality is an autonomous creation, not part

  1. Critically assess the view that the two Patrick theory solves the puzzle of Patrick

    He believes then, that the work of Palladius was then attributed to Saint Patrick. This means that the memory of Palladius per se, has been subsumed into that of Saint Patrick. O'Rahilly then moves on to attempt to explain the 432 arrival date.

  2. For a Christian euthanasia can never be a good death. Discuss

    He notes that the right to assisted death can entail a responsibility on others to kill. By this means that the doctor or physician will have the responsibility to kill the patient. Even if the patient and family give informed or group of individuals decides to give it.

  1. Contemporary discussion on Augustine

    ?Unexpressed emotions will never die. They are buried alive and will come forth later in uglier ways.? Freud also believes that the Original Sin is not passed down the generation through sexual intercourse, but rather the result of environment, such as family and education.

  2. Reasoned arguments cannot account for the amount of evil in the world. Discuss.

    These qualities can only be achieved by having challenging life experiences with the existence of evil. People supporting this view often draw examples from the Bible, and a good example would be Job. In order to test and strengthen Job?s faith, God takes away all his possessions, as well as his all his children, and later even his health too.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work