• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

meta ethics

Extracts from this document...


(1)a) Explain how meta-ethics is different from normative ethics. (33) Normative ethical theories are different moral codes of behaviour, the principles we might out into action, the rules by which we might live, the criteria we might use when making moral judgement. Utilitarianism, Kantian ethics, religious ethics, situation ethics, virtue ethics and natural law are all example of normative theories of ethics, they try to shoe us how to behave. normative ethical theories debate at ways we should of deciding what was 'good', 'bad', 'right' and 'wrong' believing them to have an absolute value. Where as... Meta ethics is a term used to describe the study of the meaning of ethical languages. What we are doing when we use words such as 'Good'? Are we expressing our feelings of approval? Meta ethical philosophers try work out what we are doing when we use moral language, because if there is no agreement about the meaning of ethical language, then ethical debates are pointless and will never achieve anything. ...read more.


Ayer believed that facts are either observable or logically necessary; moral statements are neither. They cannot be sientifically or logically proven. They are emotive expressions. Stevenson deleloped this idea, saying moral statements express subjective beliefs. Prescriptivism is the idea that moral statements instruct behaviour or hope to lead to behaviour. Prescriptivism was produced by R.M. Hare B) 'Everyone knows what good means.' Discuss. (17) Many would agree with this statement such as Normative ethical theories like Utilitarianism, Kantian ethics, religious ethics, situation ethics, virtue ethics and natural law. These theories try to show us how to behave, and debate at ways we should know what is 'good', 'bad', 'right' and 'wrong' believing them to have an absolute value. And therefore everyone knows what good is and normative ethical theories just simply shows use a good way to behave and what is 'good', 'bad', 'right' and 'wrong'. Natural Law holds that there is a good natural order to the human world which ought to be followed. Therefore natural law says that everyone should know what good is and follow the natural rules to keep the goodness. ...read more.


They cannot be scientifically or logically proven. They are emotive expressions. Stevenson developed this idea, saying moral statements express subjective beliefs. Moore thought that there is a difference between good things and goodness itself. An action may be good because it is an act of generosity, but good isn't identical to generosity. When we add 'good' to a sentence it has an affect that is different to that of the adjectives. A good knife is better than a bad knife, but when we use the word good we are probably talking about sharpness or shininess, however a good knife isn't morally better than a bad knife. We may use a good knife to stab someone, which is a morally bad thing to do. When we are calling someone good we are saying something very different from calling them 'tall' or 'short'. We may be referring to their character, or the kind things they do. The moral sense of good refers to actions, consequences, situations, people, characters, choices and lifestyles. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Religious Language cannot be proved, therefore it is meaningless

    He said Flew missed the point that believers have a commitment to trust in God based on their faith, and for this reason they do not allow evidence to undermine their faith. Mitchell says they look for answers to prove to themselves God exists.

  2. Explain and discuss the four major theories of meta-ethics; Naturalism, Emotivism, Intuitionism and Prescriptivism.

    For example, is thinking that murder is wrong, wrong? Should we be thinking that murder is right? This can also suggest that naturalism is flawed, as it does not account for the changes in our morals over periods of time.

  1. Business Ethics

    This means the results are relevant to a situation. Being relevant does not mean it is hundred percent accurate. Instead, being relevant means the probability is high that the research results reflect what is actually happening or what will happen.

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    On the contrary, in an article in U.S. News & World Report, one Rabbi was quoted as saying that although Judaism does not oppose "the use of technology to improve nature's shortcoming. . .cloning humans. . . 'is an area where we cannot go. It violates the mystery of what it means to be human.'"

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    even if they do not result in bad acts. Once this is recognised, it can be argued that utilitarianism becomes a much more complex and rich moral theory, and may align much more closely with our moral intuitions. Intentions are addressed much more seriously in deontological ethics, reflected in Kant's opinion that "the aim of life is not to achieve happiness, but to deserve it".

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    as such has the same right to life as the rest of us', I am doing no more than finding other reasons which appeal to my emotions and original feelings. Stevenson said that when we strip away all of the 'rational arguments' for moral behaviour, that is, choosing to do

  1. Business Ethics

    A final group of authors, called deontologists, explains the ethical judgement by the respect of others. Kant criticise universal law theories, because they can lead us to act immorally in the search of happiness. Regarding to Kant, the ends never justify the means.

  2. Situation Ethics

    Positivism - faith comes before reason and anything else. People must see for themselves that love is the most important thing. iv) Personalism - a situationist believes you put people first, not laws, and that, "There are no "values" in the sense of inherent goods - value is what happens to something when it happens to be useful to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work