• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Meta Ethics can simply be defined as the nature of ethical evaluations.

Extracts from this document...


Meta Ethics Meta Ethics can simply be defined as the nature of ethical evaluations. In basic terms it defines what is meant by a word used in an ethical statement. A meta-ethical theory, unlike a normative ethical theory, does not contain any ethical evaluations, it evaluates the evaluations. In meta ethics there are two kinds of belivers, those who say ethical terms can't be diffined - the non-naturalists, and those who say ethical terms can be diffined - the naturalists. To compare the two, we will look at the differences between the two beliefs using the term 'good'. We use good in everyday life, for example most people would agree that Nottingham Forest are a good football team, expecially when campared to a team like Derby County. But can we actually define what good is? G. E. Moore a non-naturalist said goodness is a simple, undefinable, non-natural property. He didn't mean that goodness is a 'super special' word, it just means it can't be reduced to natural properties like human needs, wants, pleasures, and so forth. ...read more.


That's the idea. That's how you'd know that the cake is good, if you thought that goodness might be a natural property. But if you're Moore, and you think that goodness isn't a natural property, then how do you know that anything is good? How do you distinguish the good things from the bad? Unlike the non-naturalists, naturalists believe that ethical terms can be defined. They believe that words like 'good' can be defined using other words, as they are natural properties and can therefore be defined by other natural properties. So the fact that ethical sentences can be reduced to nonethical sentences is really like saying that ethical sentences are a kind of shorthand, a kind of useful abbreviation, for claims about what are ultimately nonethical facts about human needs, desires, and so on. People would then ask, if good can be defined, how do you define it? One definition states that good is estentially 'Hedonism' another word for pleasure. ...read more.


A girl may agree that abortion is wrong but feel in her situation it is the best decision to make. We tend to make wrong decision only if we feel they will lead to better outcomes, in much the same way as proportionalism. In conclusion we can see that there are many different ways in which the term 'good' is used in Meta ethics. In Intuitionism it is used to describe moral principles that are self evidently right. In Emotivism, when we say something is 'good', it is what we see as being right according to out emotions and feelings. Prescriptivism on the other hand uses reason and logic to determine what is 'good'. Utilitarianists perceive something to be 'good' pending the results that follow the action. How we determine what is 'good' or 'bad' to ourselves, greatly depends on which ethical view we take to situations as a result of our opinion. There is no one definition for what is 'good' and so it is down to us to decide which one we believe to be right and then try to live our lives accordingly. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    The notion of universal law, in terms of euthanasia, Kant would argue that if we were obliged to alleviate suffering by destroying the sufferer, it would be hard to imagine how human life would exist for long. Euthanasia is not an option because you can not universalise the option of active euthanasia.

  2. Business Ethics

    Majid, 2002) noted that comment made by the past President of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountant who lamented that the professionalism of accountants is on a decline. The Ohio Society of Certified Public Accountants raised a similar concern and warned that unless something is done to arrest

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    As of December 1998, no definitive federal legislation has passed regarding cloning. Conclusion There are conflicting ways to view cloning from the perspectives of religion, philosophy, and law, but the issue of cloning will most likely remain a much debated topic in the years to come.

  2. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    belief in the existence of something that I wish to call God'. Neither one of these two statements is logically or empirically testable. For the strict positivist, philosophy is essentially about epistemology (theories of knowledge). Positivists believe that the realms of ethics, aesthetics and theology are outside the ambit of philosophy because they do not constitute proper knowledge.

  1. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    In this way, the logical positivists argued that all ethical statements, which rely on an understanding of 'good' and 'bad', are rendered meaningless. Some logical positivists developed this idea by saying that moral language was not only worthless, it was also nothing more than an expression of our opinion.

  2. For what reasons may situation ethics be regarded as a useful ethical theory?

    In fact the only accountability in Situation Ethics is whether your actions will result in the highest possible expression of love for others. Situation ethics would argue that one of its key strengths is its flexibility; it allows for practical decisions to be made where rule-based ethical systems follow their own absolute commandments.

  1. Explain what is meant by the term meta ethics

    Aristotle is one of the main naturalists. He believed that you could decide whether something was good by looking at whether they fulfilled their Final Cause. So if you looked at a pen, and you knew what it was meant to do, and it was doing it, then you could say that it was a good pen.

  2. How are religious and ethical principles used in the abortion debate?

    human beings is only applicable as an evaluation of their whole lives. There lies a question within the personhood debate; are all human beings persons? Clearly within Christianity the answer would be yes, as all humans have received a soul at conception, which subsequently renders them a 'person.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work