• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Mills objection to the teleological argument is stronger than the objections of Hume. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


?Mill?s objection to the teleological argument is stronger than the objections of Hume? The teleological argument (TA) stems from the word ?telos?, which means ?purpose? or ?end?. The TA is the idea that there must be a designer who designed the earth for a specific purpose. However, many people oppose the idea of a designer such as Hume and Mill. J.S Mill is a strong critic of the design argument, however he does not say that the world could not have been designed, but evidence of this does not point towards the perfectly good biblical God. Mill see?s this through observing nature and the disorder of the universe. He uses the fact that living creatures inflict cruelty onto one another and that many animals are designed and live in inhumane ways. An example of this is the female digger wasp as used in an example by Dawkins. A female will lay her eggs in a caterpillar and purposefully sting her prey as to paralyse it but not kill it. ...read more.


Mill believed that there could not be an omnibenevolent God as all evidence points towards a God who wants to inflict suffering and pain on his creation. He also argued that it does not make sense to use the world as evidence for a good God. However, many theists would argue that Mill?s criticism is weak as human?s are the primary reason for evil in the world due to the Original Sin where Adam and Eve disobeyed God and were thrown from the Garden of Eden. This helps the TA to recover as Mill fails to see human influence of natural evil amongst the world and how there could still be God, but evil is just down to humans. Hume is also a critic of the TA and draws most of his criticisms from empirical evidence. He argues that as humans we do not have sufficient knowledge of the origins of the world to assume that there is only one designer. ...read more.


He also argued that this world could be a prototype by an ?apprentice? God who went on to create bigger and better worlds and that is why there is evil in the world as God make mistakes on his first attempt. This criticism also causes issues for the TA as there is no evidence to suggest it wasn?t the traditional theistic God and was in fact a team of weaker Gods. Although many theists like Paley would argue that it?s only an analogy and faith is strong enough, it raises issues within the TA. Overall, Mill?s objection to the TA is not stronger than those presented by Hume as Mill?s oppositions can be explained to recover the TA such as that there is an evil for purpose. Whereas Hume creates a strong and almost flawless argument against the TA as he uses empirical evidence and uses the Epicurean thesis to explain that there doesn?t have to be a designer at all, it could all have happened randomly. These flaws within the TA blemish the majority of the analogies such as Paley?s watch and Aquinas?s archer and arrow. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    If the bird of prey didn't kill it would simply be 'the bird' and not 'the bird of prey'. As an argument that there is a problem with the construction of language this certainly seems a strong one, however Nietzsche attempts to apply this to human morality.

  2. What is the most telling objection to Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle?

    But how do we distinguish between these two types of pleasure? People's opinions as to what are higher and lower pleasures differ widely, and it is difficult to see how general agreement could be reached. Mill proposed, "Competent judges", who have experienced both higher and lower pleasure decide.

  1. (A) Explain Hume's objections to teleological arguments (B) God is the most likely explanation ...

    That would argue for a pluralist view of God rather than just a single. Hume did not expect us to be able to understand God in the way that we make sense of the physical world around us. Hume would also point to the evolution of our world as an argument against the teleological argument.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    - "If he has spoiled his life by mismanagement, we shall not for that reason desire to spoil it further" At this point, Mill makes a clear distinction between the part of a person's life which concerns only himself and that which concerns others.

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    This is arguable though because scientists are frequently coming up with new theories of natural creation such as evolution and 'the big bang.' Some would dispute that God designed evolution to develop the world though. Finally, Paley deduced that just because we had not seen God then that doesn't mean

  2. How, and with what success, does Hume deal with the apparent anomaly of the ...

    And with this experiment in introspection, Hume then postulates his first thesis, "... That all our simple ideas in their first appearance are deriv'd from simple impressions, which are correspondent to them, and which they exactly represent." We may call this the Copy Principle, as it simply states that every simple idea is a copy of a corresponding impression.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work