• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Miracles part b

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the philosophical problems related to purported evidence for miracles (28) b) There are many philosophical problems relating to purported evidence for miracles and there are also many criticisms put forward by philosophers. The main criticiser of miracles is Hume. Hume put forward many criticisms which appear to discredit apparent miracles. However there are also criticisms which suggest that Hume's problems with the evidence for miracles aren't sufficient to reject the existence of miracles. One of the most important criticisms of miracles put forward was from Hume. He said that "there is not to be found in all history, any miracle attested by a sufficient number of men, of such unquestioned good sense, education and learning, as to secure us against all delusion." He argues that no single man is reliable and trustworthy enough to be believed, and that no miracle has been witnessed by enough people to be believed or proven to be true. This is important because if his argument to be believed, then miracles don't exist and have never occurred. However Hume didn't actually specify how many men constituted a sufficient number, or how good sense, education and learning was to be measured and judged. ...read more.


He used the Principle of Credulity which says that we should trust people and not be sceptical of what they say. He said that "if it seems to a person that X is present, then X probably is present." He also said that it should be up to the sceptic to prove the miracle didn't happen, not the other way round. He said that it is "reasonable to believe that the experiences of others are probably as they report them" which is supported by the Principle of Testimony, that states that people are unlikely to lie. This is important because it uses the opposite assumption of human nature to Hume. Hume assumes that people are untrustworthy and lie, whereas Swinburne argues that people don't always lie. A less important but still substantial criticism is Hume's comments on human nature and excitement. He said that it's in human nature to love excitement, and so people could be easily persuaded that they've experienced a miracle and talk about it more because it's exciting. He also states that miracles witnessed and recorded thousands of years ago are unreliable because the witnesses were "primitive and uneducated." ...read more.


Although philosophers such as Swinburne say that we must trust people, there have been numerous false claims of miracles occurring and so we must not be gullible and require some form of evidence. It is today widely accepted that the laws of nature are changeable or extendable and so events don't "violate" them which makes Hume's definition quite inadequate. However Hume's definition is regarded as the classical understanding of miracles, and has been accepted over time and so must be given some credit even if it isn't completely believable. Throughout history, miracles have been the subject of much debate due to the lack of evidential support backing them up. Hume's argument regarding testimonies is important and accurate when referring to miracles witnessed by one person with out any kind of other evidence. However it's not possible to determine if every single witness of a miracle is lying and many events thought to have been miracles have since been proved using today's science and more advances in science could further disprove thing events thought to have been miracles have since been proved using today's science and more advances in science could further disprove things we would assume to be miracles today. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Assess Humes reasons for rejecting miracles

    The miracles of people being cured at Lourdes, as well as those reported in the Bible simply show that miracles were used to cover up a lack of understanding of a way the world worked and to increase people's faith in God, something which is no longer necessary as most

  2. Moot-court Reflective Report.

    well in advanced, and had spent a lot of time preparing it, so we were ready. However, when it was finally our turn to present our argument to the judge, it got postponed until the next day. This was disappointing as were had mentally prepared ourselves to deliver our arguments to the moot judge.

  1. How, and with what success, does Hume deal with the apparent anomaly of the ...

    The problem of this lies in the basis of the empiricist doctrine at which Hume is following, namely, that all ideas must be preceded by experience, yet, in this example, it is demonstrated that it is possible for an idea to precede sensation experience, as the man is able to

  2. The idea of miracles is a major obstacle to faith in the modern world ...

    If one was to adopt Holland's approach, then the fact that science can explain what some call miracles is irrelevant, because ordinary coincidences can be seen as God's work. There is by no means unanimous agreement on what it means to say 'miracle', and definitions vary in strength from an

  1. Hume has shown miracles do not exist

    Hume doesn't believe in chance or in supernatural intervention. Hence, he asks for us to go with the evidence and consider which state of affairs is more probable, a miracle or a more ordinary explanation. Hume's argument from induction asks us to rely on logic Hume continues to argue against the existence of miracles in his practical arguments.

  2. Philosophers Views on Miracles Essay

    Hume believes that most miracle testimonies come from barbarous nations; this means that their trusts in seeing a miracle were unreliable and had not been touched with science or enlighten. I agree on the terms of what David Hume argues due to the fact that miracles have not been witnessed by others but are only mere testimonies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work