• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Moral absolutism. Moralism seems to be an essential component of American conservatism, whose adherents feel far more comfortable evaluating ethicality in terms of simple rules (i.e. morals) than in terms of harm/benefit.

Extracts from this document...


Mrs Kirk Ethics - Moral absolutism Moralism, also know as moral absolutism, is the practice of interpreting the ethicality of various subjects (actions, people, etc.) as good or bad things based solely in terms of how well they conform to a particular moral code rather than by attempting to evaluate the harm or benefit caused by those subjects. It can also be described as "the belief that there are absolute standards against which moral questions can be judged, and that certain actions are right or wrong, devoid of the context of the act." Most moralists allow for some exceptions to their moral rules, permitting conscience and empathy to override in cases where "sticking to the rules" would be clearly harmful. Those who refuse to allow exceptions to moral rules tend to be regarded as extremists Most religion is based on moralism, as one of the defining characteristics of religion is reliance on dogmatic rules for evaluating ethicality rather than an open and rational examination of the effects of ethically-significant entities. ...read more.


If someone was absolutist about following the commandments then they would never kill steal or cheat, attributes that a sociable citizen of today's society would need to be able to live. In essence being absolutist allows for a lot of communities to remain healthy happy places due to a strict moral code held by its people, a creed which they will never break due to either strong moral will or fear of what would happen if they ever did. Does this mean moral absolutism is a justifiable thing, no it does not, while yes there is evidence to show that it can help a community rather than hinder it , moral absolutism has been shown time and time again to be a bad, inhuman thing, that has caused misery amongst many people. For example, repeating what I said earlier about homosexuals and how they are viewed amongst most religious groups is nothing more than a prosecution of a minority, no different from racism, which brings me to my second point. ...read more.


These finalistic views don't have a place in today's society, a society that is constantly changing and evolving, learning to accept what before was deemed different and showing understanding to a once ignorantly feared subject. They prospered before in a world where people did not have a say in their own lives, lives which were run by ancient scripts and texts that didn't change with the time or attitudes and remained defiant to the evolution of mankind. Moral absolutism is not justified as a practical option in today's moral climate and is constantly at war with the changing views of communities and government's, and yes it does have a strong moral stature, an almost incorruptible sense to its harsh cold views, but this is still unable to secure its place in the modern world, for its greatest flaw is that moral absolutism is a simply un-human prospect, with no place inside our minds as well as our community. John Clarke 12 Jmt ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Discuss the Relationship between law and morals. Consider how far the law seeks to ...

    In particular, individual privacy should be respected wherever possible. He recognised that some immoral acts might be tolerated. Hart on the other hand, thought that there is little or no shared morality in the modern pluralist society beyond his "minimum content" for the protection of persons and property and there is no freedom if we can do only these acts that others approve of.

  2. Can moral absolutism be justified?

    of higher importance that doing something just because it is believed to be intrinsically right. This is prominent in the teachings of Jesus Christ. Another weakness in the appliance of moral absolutism is the disagreement it could cause amongst different cultures.

  1. Moral Absolutism can Never be Justified. Discuss

    Similarly Absolutism is arguably the root cause of conflict. Deontological ethics gives us the permission to abuse those that disagree with us, since we are fighting for our perception of human rights, which ultimately affect us all. It allows pro-Israel thinkers to classify critics of Israeli policy as anti-Semites.

  2. Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

    It brings attention to the fact that sexual acts between husband and wife would be seen as perfectly okay as long as it was in private but if it public then it would be considered immoral. However, sexual acts between two homosexuals would be considered immoral whether it was private or in public.

  1. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    It cannot, and, as we have clearly seen, does not prevent crime outside of insultingly simple models of human behavioral response. Where is the purpose? The purpose of the Death Penalty lies in anger and hatred. Often has it been said that anyone who would not want a murderer of a relative to die is "sick."

  2. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    This is the least important therefore if this conflicts with the other laws it can be dismissed. Each of the laws is dependant on the one more superior to it therefore each of the laws needs to be considered when making decisions.

  1. Examine and comment on the view that religious and/or moral principles provide essential guidelines ...

    pro-choice supporters that life begins at conception as embryology textbooks and pro-choice advocates concede that human life begins when the egg and sperm unite. ?It is the penetration of the ovum by a sperm and the resulting mingling of nuclear material each brings to the union that constitutes the initiation

  2. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    The Roman Catholics Church would say permitting abortion may be killing a human entity who has a full entitlement to life. From the moment of conception, the nature of prenatal existence is merely the evolving of human growth and development, which does not cease until death.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work