• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Moral absolutism. Moralism seems to be an essential component of American conservatism, whose adherents feel far more comfortable evaluating ethicality in terms of simple rules (i.e. morals) than in terms of harm/benefit.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mrs Kirk Ethics - Moral absolutism Moralism, also know as moral absolutism, is the practice of interpreting the ethicality of various subjects (actions, people, etc.) as good or bad things based solely in terms of how well they conform to a particular moral code rather than by attempting to evaluate the harm or benefit caused by those subjects. It can also be described as "the belief that there are absolute standards against which moral questions can be judged, and that certain actions are right or wrong, devoid of the context of the act." Most moralists allow for some exceptions to their moral rules, permitting conscience and empathy to override in cases where "sticking to the rules" would be clearly harmful. Those who refuse to allow exceptions to moral rules tend to be regarded as extremists Most religion is based on moralism, as one of the defining characteristics of religion is reliance on dogmatic rules for evaluating ethicality rather than an open and rational examination of the effects of ethically-significant entities. ...read more.

Middle

If someone was absolutist about following the commandments then they would never kill steal or cheat, attributes that a sociable citizen of today's society would need to be able to live. In essence being absolutist allows for a lot of communities to remain healthy happy places due to a strict moral code held by its people, a creed which they will never break due to either strong moral will or fear of what would happen if they ever did. Does this mean moral absolutism is a justifiable thing, no it does not, while yes there is evidence to show that it can help a community rather than hinder it , moral absolutism has been shown time and time again to be a bad, inhuman thing, that has caused misery amongst many people. For example, repeating what I said earlier about homosexuals and how they are viewed amongst most religious groups is nothing more than a prosecution of a minority, no different from racism, which brings me to my second point. ...read more.

Conclusion

These finalistic views don't have a place in today's society, a society that is constantly changing and evolving, learning to accept what before was deemed different and showing understanding to a once ignorantly feared subject. They prospered before in a world where people did not have a say in their own lives, lives which were run by ancient scripts and texts that didn't change with the time or attitudes and remained defiant to the evolution of mankind. Moral absolutism is not justified as a practical option in today's moral climate and is constantly at war with the changing views of communities and government's, and yes it does have a strong moral stature, an almost incorruptible sense to its harsh cold views, but this is still unable to secure its place in the modern world, for its greatest flaw is that moral absolutism is a simply un-human prospect, with no place inside our minds as well as our community. John Clarke 12 Jmt ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Discuss the Relationship between law and morals. Consider how far the law seeks to ...

    In particular, individual privacy should be respected wherever possible. He recognised that some immoral acts might be tolerated. Hart on the other hand, thought that there is little or no shared morality in the modern pluralist society beyond his "minimum content" for the protection of persons and property and there is no freedom if we can do only these acts that others approve of.

  2. Moral Absolutism can Never be Justified. Discuss

    Similarly Absolutism is arguably the root cause of conflict. Deontological ethics gives us the permission to abuse those that disagree with us, since we are fighting for our perception of human rights, which ultimately affect us all. It allows pro-Israel thinkers to classify critics of Israeli policy as anti-Semites.

  1. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    suffering from psychotic delusions while waiting for their deaths and others so mentally underdeveloped that they request snow cones for their final meals. We continue to lower the age at which a child can be, criminally, treated as an adult and executed.

  2. Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

    The causes of homosexuality can often be split up into different categories; biological, psychoanalytical and social learning theories. And of course many doctors and psychologists seem to go for a combination of all three. However, despite the general consensus that we do not know the cause of homosexuality, there have been certain aspects of it that people agree on.

  1. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    For example; a women may choose to achieve success in her work rather than become a mother and reproduce and not follow this primary precept. Her life is surely not more immoral? This shows that the theory fails to be practical when there are specific moral injunctions which conflict with the more general principles.

  2. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    After viability, the mother?s rights can no longer take priority. Medicine is not advanced enough to discover the exact point the foetus is viable; the only way of finding out would result in the foetus being killed. Because we are biological entities, we develop at different rates depending on environmental

  1. Examine and comment on the view that religious and/or moral principles provide essential guidelines ...

    pro-choice supporters that life begins at conception as embryology textbooks and pro-choice advocates concede that human life begins when the egg and sperm unite. ?It is the penetration of the ovum by a sperm and the resulting mingling of nuclear material each brings to the union that constitutes the initiation

  2. Explain the differences between Cultural Relativism and Cultural Absolutism

    However, these values are not absolute. This theory is known as Cultural Relativism. It is the idea that people around the world will have different morals because our cultures are different, and that it is possible for two cultures to have completely opposite values. We can observe this in the world today, for example, The Ik

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work