• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Moral Pluralism

Extracts from this document...


Moral Pluralism Ralph M. Dahm SCI 361 - Environmental Issues and Ethics Dr. Theodore R. Ferguson April 16, 2005 Abstract Moral pluralism acknowledges the existence of opposing ideas and practices. Moral judgments are determined by using more than one criterion. The views of several moral ethicists are examined and considered. Topical examples are provided supporting both sides of moral pluralism as applied to environmental issues. Concerns for and affects on future generations are postulated. The view toward protecting the natural world by the public is visited. Do non-living elements of ecological systems have rights? A "prime directive" is suggested. This directive could be incorporated by the human species when interacting with the natural environment. Moral Pluralism Fournier (2005) defines moral pluralism as using more than one criterion to make moral judgments. Pluralism acknowledges the existence of opposing ideas and practices. This concept does not suggest they are equally valid. Pluralism reigns in the real-world. Humans think of the natural environment as something that exists for their benefit. Protection of the ecosystems frequently results only by regulation. Beatley (1994) embraces moral pluralism by suggesting that "no single paradigm is applicable in all circumstances". He suggests the moral approach to be applied is determined by the specific land-use situation. ...read more.


If the global economy grows by just 2 % per year, in a century it will have grown to 7 times its current size. This means prosperity is increasing worldwide. It is powered by its own momentum. Yet despite being materially better off, future generations may feel worse off due to the loss of a diverse natural environment. The cost of petroleum has risen dramatically. Yet demand for oil continues to rise. Global warming is increasing. Human population is spreading over greater areas of the planet. Pollution continues unabated in many geographic areas. Substantial ecological disruption will result. Numerous plant and animal species will be endangered. According to Leopold (1970) no ethic yet exists for dealing with the relationship between humans and the "land". By "land" Leopold means plants, animals, and ecological systems in general. The human species has a moral obligation to future generations to protect and cherish natural environments. This obligation extends to animals and plants. As the dominant species on Earth humans must assume this responsibility. Yet humans are selective in their moral choices. A report from the Associated Press describes how 4 injured pelicans were discovered in Huntington Beach, California. This incident occurred in early April, 2005. These were endangered brown pelicans. ...read more.


Every organism has innate goodness. They are worthy of our moral concern. Frequently human endeavors cause harm to ecological systems. It is inevitable due to the surging human population. Some species will be negatively impacted. Hopefully, through studied consideration the damage can be minimal. Humans are able to live in harmony with the natural environment with negligible damage to other species. The harm caused by those without moral values toward the environment can be mitigated. All living beings have moral standing. It could be argued that non-living elements of the environment have moral standing too. Even a rock or boulder has its place in ecological systems. Removing the rock because it is "in the way" removes a safe haven for small animals. Moving a boulder from a river so "it flows better" affects aquatic life dependent on the large rock for shelter. The point being every action causes a reaction. Sentient beings need to consider the consequences of their actions on the natural world. Ecosystems are constantly changing and evolving. This is a natural process. Humans need to recognize their actions have significant impact locally and possibly globally. Once the damage has been inflicted it may not be undone. Humans can no longer afford the luxury of moral pluralism. A consistent and thoughtful approach to the interaction of human activity with the natural environment must be the norm. A guiding principle dating back to Hippocrates is appropriate: "First, do no harm. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Does the non-human natural world have an intrinsic value (independent of human interests)? What ...

    someone to represent animal interests and to decide how much, in relation to human interests, animal interests would count; and that because only human beings can raise these moral questions, they are the only ones worthy of making such decisions.

  2. Humans are Eternal Beings

    often hard to distinguish from reality), and finally the 'evil demon' (how do we know that the world 'truths' such as geometry and logic are not being manipulated by an evil demon?). The evil demon can trick you into thinking anything, so that you know nothing.

  1. Business environment

    Globalization of business creates power and legal vacuum situations where mega-size company power can't be matched by small countries. These companies are in a position to tackle undue advantage of their size. More company power and more stockholder powerlessness create more moral responsibility.

  2. In what sense (if any) was Machiavelli's approach to politics 'scientific' rather than 'moral'?

    Therefore in this essay I will study the reasons for Machiavelli's approach, his beliefs on a prince's virtues, cruelty and compassion, and a 'prince's honour'. Machiavelli wanted to know how real power works. He wanted to look at how men get hold of power, how they keep it and what they achieve by it.

  1. Ethics in Business

    It has been suggested that codes should be specific enough to show employees the spirit in which they should do things, yet loose enough to allow freedom of judgment. Human Resources must be careful when establishing a code of ethics.

  2. Examine and comment on the view that religious and/or moral principles provide essential guidelines ...

    But, the word ?capacity? is too subjective, it does not outline whether it means potential capacity or actualised capacity. Instead, the definition I will be using of the term ?person? is when it is constituted as an entity with basic rights.

  1. To what extent do we have an individual moral responsibility to the environment

    However, another Christian view of the world is stewardship, which is the idea that God has given humans the responsibility to care and look after the planet, this is shown in the creation story within Genesis as it emphasises the protection and preservation of God?s creation.

  2. Is Limiting Population Growth a Key Factor in Protecting the Global Environment?

    He also points out that even though Malthus may have been proved wrong in his assumptions, many situations have occurred which reflected other concerns of those who have expressed them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work