• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Morality is rational and objective - discuss

Extracts from this document...


According to Kant morality is rational and objective. It is based on rational human reasoning. For Kant it is not the consequences of an action that make it moral but the reasoning or intention that goes behind the choices one makes. What Kant is saying is that the only thing which can be qualified as good is good intention. When the intention behind an action is good, (what Kant calls the Good Will) then the act is morally plausible because it is being done out of duty. The will in this sense is seen as the power of rationale behind a moral choice and out of this is borne the dignity of man. On the other hand, acting out of inclination (emotions) is not moral because it is either based on self interest or because one is bound to do so by his conscience. Acting out of duty in Kant's point of view is acting in respect to the moral law which is determined by what he calls the "Categorical Imperative". The Categorical Imperative is bound by three basic principles which state that before an action takes place there is the need to consider the maxim on which one is acting. If this maxim is generalized, would it continue to make sense? Does it contradict itself? Would you choose to live in a world where everyone follows this maxim? ...read more.


Kobby is a glutton, very mean and selfish. He's also walking down the same streets of Accra eating his favorite fruit cake (of which he has eaten a little over half) freshly baked from the bakery. Kobby sees this same old man and realizes that if he does not give this old man some food, he'll probably die in the next few seconds. Kobby hesitates but eventually gives out his cake to the old man. According to Kant, Kobby's actions are moral because they were not out of inclination but out of the duty. The intention behind the action is to ensure that a fellow human being who is also entitled to food for sustenance and life is preserved. He is basically acting on the maxim "Share and give to the needy" if this maxim was to be generalized, it would perfectly enhance peace and equity in society. Secondly the idea is conceivable. Such a maxim treats the old man as an end because Kobby saw him as being entitled to the basic necessities of life and in giving him food helped preserve his humanity. Hence, it is possible to act on such a maxim and for Kant, this is moral. At the heart of Kant's argument is that ultimately people act out of self-interest for one reason or the other and that actions based on emotions or inclinations are not moral because there was no reasoning behind them. ...read more.


In the first principle of the Categorical Imperative Kant states that 'Only act on a maxim that you could will should become a universal law'. Our culture, nurturing and experiences inevitably formulate and mould the way we act to situations and circumstances. Morality cannot be universally objective as Kant says. It could however be socially or culturally objective. Society and culture form the basis of moral law. After all whoever will be passing judgment on our actions are the people in our societies because most of these laws are unwritten. Hence to act in such a way that your maxim may become a universal law could be misleading. The issue of morality is an abstract one and not yet universally definable. However, what is clear and specific is the fact that man is a rational being and usually acts to ensure self preservation or a better well-being for himself directly or indirectly. Therefore, even though most of us believe that we act out of genuine compassion for our fellow man, we do so after thinking of what the actions will yield. As such Kant may be justified to an extent in saying that most of our action are carried out in self -interest. More so it can be said that there exist a significant minority of people who can be said to have achieved a higher sense of morality and as such do things without reasoning or a sense of duty to moral law but out of what they personally believe to be right or wrong. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    Kant is indeed ingenious and, I think, sound in suggesting that freedom...is a necessary presupposition of all thinking. This may serve as a defence of the presupposition...but it is not sufficient to justify this presupposition.' (p.244). 3. The third objection is to do with the 'conflict of duties'.

  2. (a) Examine the reasons why some argue that morality is linked ...

    Humanism emphasizes morals without religion and strongly refutes the view that morality must entail a religious base. Whereas the Christian regards morality as something that has been imposed on man from above by a supernatural lawgiver, the humanist regards it as something that has been worked out and is still

  1. Deontology - looking for an objective basis to ground all moral action.

    Hence, for example, a deontologist cannot lie even when the lie would prevent the loss of several innocent lives. Deontology constraints or laws are always formulated as negatives: 'do not' rather than 'do'. These constraints start to define what is obligatory or what constitutes our duty.

  2. Religion and Morality

    to go against your own self-interest for the benefit of others, as self-sacrificial acts are looked upon well by God. This provides more answers to the question 'Why be Moral?' The DCT can be accessed through the Decalogue in the Bible (Exodus 20, old Testament), which provides a set of ten absolute, deontological commands by God.

  1. Is there a link between Morality and Religion?

    believe in God and religion then how are they then able to make moral decisions? Ideas such as supernaturalism states it is impossible to know- it is this proposal of which a moral judgment describes God will; 'x is good' means 'God desires x '.

  2. Describe Kant’s theory of Duty as the basis of morality (33 marks).

    will' and that a man of good will is one that follows where his duty lies. This is done for the very reason that it is the right thing to do and we have a responsibility to do it. It does not come from self-interest, calculating consequences, looking at specific

  1. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    In order for intervention to count as humanitarian, at least part of the basic reason for intervening must be to end suffering or oppression, though there might be other reasons which also motivate, for example national interest."2 However, humanitarian intervention, as suggested by the title of this essay, is ruled out by the morality of states.

  2. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    fairly normal thing to do, and they also do not allow us to use emotion or previous experiences to work out right and wrong, good or bad.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work