• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Morals codes distinguish between order and chaos and good and evil.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Morals codes distinguish between order and chaos and good and evil. Moral codes provide us with ways to make ethical decisions of our actions which determines either stability or destruction of our individual life, community, and/or society. The moral codes by which we live and survive life enables society to progress in an organized and reasonable fashion. However, ethics, an area of knowledge, possess many problems of knowledge because moral codes by which humans live are not always upheld due to human nature. Moral codes change from culture to culture thus causing conflicts between people and uncertainty of what is moral. We should follow moral codes in order to survive, have order in society, and prosper, however; moral relativism and human nature causes the problems of knowledge in the area of knowledge of ethics. We must follow moral codes to have order in society. For example, a man, who desired to give his daughter her most wanted Christmas gift, robbed a toy store and was later arrested and put in jail. Our morals help us identify the man's actions as ethically wrong. ...read more.

Middle

This is when moral relativism comes into play and causes conflicts within the area of knowledge of ethics. Moral codes vary from culture to culture. A person or group may disobey certain laws because according to them the law does not uphold their moral code, which in turn makes their disobedience of law ethical (Singer 303). For example, Gandhi marched and fasted to relieve oppression of his fellow Indians. However, many people were killed in the process. To the Indians the British were immoral for their oppressive ways and to the British the Indians were immoral for breaking their laws. In Gandhi's case the outcome was a positive societal change. However, civil disobedience, which is inspired by immorality, may sometimes cause more problems than in the beginning because domino affects may take place meaning more and more people may start disobeying more laws because every law might seem unjust to someone. Another instance, Alcohol was outlawed during the 1920s. People who want to quit drinking need alcohol because they must gradually drink less and less instead of completely stopping at one time. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, both types of students must attend class and work together. Problems arise because it is unfair for students who follow their moral code to study and learn their material rather than the students who cheat to make higher grades. However, everyone will not follow their moral codes because it is human nature. Human nature is a problem of knowledge within ethics. We do not wear our seat belts sometimes or perhaps speed everyday because we as humans are not perfect, however; without moral codes we would be lost in our everyday lives because we base our actions and decisions on our moral codes of ethics. Ethics is huge part of our everyday lives. We unconsciously base our decisions on what is right or wrong through our moral codes. We must follow moral codes because society would be in complete disarray and unable to proceed. Secondly, without moral codes, we as humans would not be able to survive our crimes against one another because there would be no laws. Thirdly, moral codes provide us with ways to prosper as individuals and progress in society. Ethics conflict and ever changes from individual to individual and culture to culture, nevertheless; ethics is necessary for us to survive, move forward and prosper in our lives. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Discuss the Relationship between law and morals. Consider how far the law seeks to ...

    to the supposed moral rule that deliberately killing another human being is wrong even when that other has consented to or asked for the killing. Some of these countries (excluding the United Kingdom) have no qualms about killing criminals who have not consented to the killing, but the moral exception

  2. Utilitarianism is unjust

    The experience machine is all about maximizing pleasure; however that does not mean that we actually feel that pleasure. It is the experience of pleasure. Utilitarianism is all about maximizing satisfaction and happiness, and to some people, that is exactly what the Experience Machine does for them.

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    The marriage of the two functions-care and treatment-is hardly more than a hundred years old. But my focus is on the modern setting, on medicine as it functions within the hospital system. It might be of interest to explore the curious Joseph Fletcher is Professor of Medical Ethics at the

  2. What is the task of Kant's groundwork of the metaphysic of morals supposed to ...

    Kant expresses deep dissatisfaction with the idealistic and empirical lines of inquiry. Kant gives a number of arguments to show that Hume's and other theorists' empiricist positions are untenable because they necessarily presupposes the very claims they set out to disprove.

  1. Do we need God to have morals?

    Good and bad are undoubtedly there, religious people say, but we can't see them. This is the case with God. They know that he is there but he is unseen. This suggest that's that there is a bond between the two and in a Christian's sight meaning that we need God to know what is morally right.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    Socrates might have meant that to him, Socrates, an unexamined life is not worth living. This would mean that he would rather die than give up inquiry, which in fact he decided to do. It could mean that to compel a person to live a life of inquiry would make

  1. The Dreamings as being fundamental to Aboriginal cultures & societies

    missn set up ( many grps. lost independence/died out, separatn of kin & loss of language: unable to communicate stories - both fundamental to Abor. spir. ( miscegnatn (interbreeding) occurring in settled areas ( 1830s ( Dispossessn of land, resulting in social, spiritual & economical disintegratn ( 1840-1880s ( Pacificatn by force ( 1880-1911 ( 'Protectn' policies - Abor.

  2. Compare Mill and Kant's ethical theories; which makes a better societal order?

    The categorical imperative is the basis of morality and was stated by Kant in these words: "Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will and general natural law." Therefore, before proceeding to act, you must decide what rule you would be following if you

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work