• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Outline the theory of Natural Moral Law (18) Natural Moral Law is an absolutist ethical theory which means that there is a moral command that is true to everyone all of the time, so it is universal and hopes to achieve absolute morality; ?As fire burns both here and in Persia? Aristotle. Cicero stated that humans have the ability to reason and follow an intended purpose so that ?true law is right in accordance to nature?. It is based on deontology which originates from the Greek word ?deon? meaning duty. This means the motivation of an action is defined independently of its outcome and the action must be intrinsically good rather than instrumental. As it is concerned with reason Mel Thompson expressed the theory as ?the rational understanding and following of God?s final purpose?. It is a deductive theory because it starts with the basic principles and from these the right course of action in a particular situation is deduced. The theory is a pre-Christian idea which was first introduced by Aristotle, a Greek philosopher. Aristotle believed that there is an efficient cause which allows us to fulfill our Final cause (telos or purpose). For example we plant seeds and water them as an efficient cause to reach the final cause of a flower blossoming. The efficient cause is a statement of fact of descriptive ethics (saying what is there) however the final cause moves to normative ethics (statements about what we should and shouldn?t do) ...read more.


This provides the reason behind an immoral action despite their fundamentally good nature. They are pleasurable but will ultimately lead to a fall short of our potential. These include adultery, binge drinking, overeating and sex. ?A fornicator seeks a pleasure which invokes him in moral guilt.? Bernard Hoose and Richard McCormick have developed natural moral law in recent years in order to simplify it so that it is more applicable in the 21st century. They proposed the idea of Proportionalism which suggests that natural moral law is not just a strict set of absolute laws but a system of guidelines for us to use and navigate ourselves. Hoose said ?it is never right to go against a principle unless there is a proportionate reason which would justify it.? Proportionalism can be used to justify an action such as not treating a terminally ill person because the treatment being suggested may cause more pain for the person as a result and the pain would be disproportionate to the outcome of the treatment not going ahead. Evaluate the view that Natural Moral Law fails to be a practical theory in the 21st century (12) Christians, in particular Roman Catholics, still value Natural Moral Law and use it for guidance because it is an example of absolute morality and provides a set of clear cut rules. There is no need to look at each individual situation because it is unchanging and universal. It is also made accessible by our reason and it makes God?s reason accessible to a believer because humans and God share rationality. ...read more.


The doctrine of double effect and casuistry are also often seen as a way of introducing exceptions to the rules. The leniency which Aquinas applies with the idea of real and apparent goods many allow people to unintentionally commit evil acts because they can justify an act by a good intention because they do not need to consider the consequences of their actions. This shows serious flaws in the practicality of the theory in the 21st century and could potentially justify Hitler?s actions of killing the Jews because he strove for the apparent good of ethnic cleansing. Overall it is really ?a threshold of your own conviction and a matter of personal taste? as Paul Davies said, as to whether you accept the practicality of this principle in the 21st century. It is still practical for many Roman Catholics and provides a definite theory which can be applied universally, however in my opinion it is far too impersonal and impractical when dealing with situations of complexity such as those which we see in the modern world and 21st century, including Euthanasia, Abortion and homosexuality therefore I agree with Bertrand Russell who argues that the theory ?appeals to the respectable middle class.? These have conflicting precepts which make them difficult to determine with an absolutist theory. Personally I prefer the relativist stance which takes each individual situation into account and is more personable and flexible which allows the cultural diversity which we see in the world today. I would agree with Kai Neilson that ?the idea of human natural is a culturally constructed concept, not a scientific one.? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Teenagers today lack moral values and self-discipline. Do you agree?"

    Therefore, unlike in the past, where moral values and self-discipline were the norm, they are scarce in today's younger generation. Teens today generally lack morality, and do not realize the severity of their debauch actions. Instead, they display extremely bad ethics and treat their immoral actions lightly.

  2. To what extent would a follower of Natural Law allow euthanasia?

    some people would argue that this complies with the Doctrine because it is a good act with a bad consequence. For example, Doctor Kevorkian helped Thomas Hyde to commit suicide in 1993. Although Doctor Kevorkian knew this was an illegal act, he justified himself by saying that his primary intention

  1. Discuss the Relationship between law and morals. Consider how far the law seeks to ...

    The Hart v Devlin (1957) debate was trying to answer this very question. Devlin believed that the law should reflect morality and said society has the right to punish any act that offends against its shared morality, but that it should exercise this right only sparingly. In particular, individual privacy should be respected wherever possible.

  2. Critically examine what is meant by natural moral law.

    This is because if purpose isn't reversed then there is no chance of apparent goods. Examples could include abortion, euthanasia or even homosexuality (!) Which all go against one of the three ideals. Previously mentioned was that of the word 'purpose'.

  1. Natural Law

    live within the natural law), would leave us without understanding of whether or not something was "good or bad", for ourselves. How ideal would this existence be? Natural Law enables people to establish common rules to structure communities, links faith with reason, gives guidance on everyday life and links them

  2. Examine the key features of situation ethics, and the main criticisms of it, and ...

    He argued that it is highly improbable for someone to be presented with the extreme circumstances presented by Fletcher, so it is not reasonable to base the principle of situation ethics on these such matters. He wrote in Ethics in a Permissive Society, "It is much easier to agree that

  1. Analyse the important features of Natural Moral Law

    Therefore, all actions that are not in the pursuit of perfection can be explained to be an apparent good. For example, according to Aquinas, Hitler believed that he was doing what was best for Germany; however this is seen as an apparent good as his actions were evil and they affected millions of people.

  2. Explain, with examples, Aquinas theory of Natural Law.

    To sum up the theory of Natural Moral Law, it is basically here and should be used to help people thrive to reach their true and full potential. It allows us all to appreciate the laws and the importance they have in our lives and using the primary precepts we

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work