• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Natural Moral Law

Extracts from this document...


Natural Moral Law Natural Moral Law is a universal deontological theory that basis itself as an objective and ideal to order human society. The term 'Natural Law' was introduced by Aristotle (384-322 BCE) in his 'Nicomachaen Ethics.' Those who accept natural law argue that all problems about defining 'good' can be resolved by discovering what is natural. From the time of the Ancient Greek philosophers to the present day Natural moral law remains one of the most powerful Ethical theories. The Sophists argued that no one could violate the laws of nature. They believed that the 'strong should dominate the weak.' On the other hand Plato wrote in his 'Republic' that society be the hunters and the weaker to be doctors of the group. Aristotle and the Stoics believed that Natural Law cannot be changed it is by everybody and therefore can be universalised as a universal truth. The basis of natural law is that there is an objectively ideal way to be human and that it is by this ideal we measure our humanity. If our ideal was reached we would be completely happy, as we would have realised our maximum physical, spiritual and mental health. Natural law argues that reason and the law of the universe tells us what is good. ...read more.


The Roman Catholic Church continues to hold the view of natural law set forth by Thomas Aquinas, particularly in his Summa Theologica, this view is also shared by some Protestant churches. They understand human beings to consist of body and mind, the physical and the non-physical and that the two are inextricably linked. Humans are capable of discerning the difference between good and evil because they have a conscience. There are many manifestations of the good that we can pursue. Some, like procreation, are common to other animals, while others, like the pursuit of truth, are inclinations peculiar to the capacities of human beings. To know what is right, one must use one's reason and apply it to Aquinas' precepts. The most important is the primary precept, self preservation. There are also four subsidiary precepts: procreation, education of children, living in society, and worshipping God. In addition to these, there are secondary precepts, which Aquinas did not specify like the other five. Therefore, for a deontological ethical theory they are open to a surprisingly large amount of interpretation and flexibility. Any rule that helps man to live up to the primary or subsidiary precepts can be a secondary precept, for example: * Drunkenness is wrong because it injures one's health, and worse, destroys one's ability to reason, which is fundamental to man as a rational animal (i.e. ...read more.


Natural Law shows what our moral life should be like on the assumption that we are rational beings who live in a world designed by a rational creator. If this is challenged so is Natural Law. However, what we regard as human nature is a product of the culture and society we live in e.g. In the case of sexuality we decide what is natural. Homosexuality can occur in societies therefore God lets it happen so it must be natural on the other hand it could be viewed as a mistake in nature like a handicap. The strengths that can be credited to Natural Law are a product of it's absolutist deontological view of mortality. This is to say that it enables people to establish common rules in order to structure communities Aquinas's view of reason as a means for moral understanding and his idea of a common nature and morality for all people give natural law a universal proposal that goes beyond any one religion or culture. This can be seen as a very positive aspect considering the conflict and disputes that exist between cultures and societies, which uphold similar basic principles for example preserving life at all costs. Natural moral law gives a concrete reason to be moral and provides a firm basis for individuals to be moral and provides a firm basis for individuals to refuse to cross moral boundaries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Discuss the Relationship between law and morals. Consider how far the law seeks to ...

    She had great difficulty in talking, eating and sleeping. She was concerned that her husband would be convicted of a serious offence if he helped her to end her life and therefore sought permission of the court for euthanasia. The courts in the United Kingdom reluctantly refused her request, as did the European Court of Human Rights.

  2. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    it did not treat its employees with insensitivity but their actions seem to contradict this. They even drafted a corporate AIDS policy stating that AIDS is treated like any other illness contracted by an employee. I wonder under the circumstances if an employee with lung cancer would have suffered the

  1. Analyse and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of natural moral law as a definitive ...

    and the results of actions that in turn determine the goodness or badness of an action and not the action in itself.

  2. What is Natural Moral Law? What are the strengths and weaknesses of NML?

    Actuality is the way something is - the more potentials that are realised, the better it is. For example, a developed oak tree is better than a stunted one.

  1. Religious Studies - Ethics: Natural Moral Law

    This belief opposes the Protestant viewpoint where emphasis is put on scripture and revelation. Aquinas thought that human nature is essentially good and are generally drawn to what is good and right, however, he accepted that it was possible for humans to be mislead into following an 'apparent good' rather than a real good.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Natural Law.

    the middle-east) which all uphold similar basic principles such as conserving life. Moreover, natural moral law gives a concrete reason to be moral and provides a firm basis for individuals to refuse to cross moral boundaries. It also provides justification and support for those ideas popular in today's world such as human rights, whilst condemning actions such as torture, irrespective of consequences.

  1. Analyse the important features of Natural Moral Law

    For example, to help an old lady across the road is seen as a good exterior act, however to impress someone can be seen as a bad exterior act.

  2. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    of these primary precepts can be upheld with secondary precepts which are the practical human rules that govern our daily behaviour and are more flexible. ?It?s secondary precepts ...though they are unalterable in the majority of cases...can nevertheless be changed on some particular and rare occasion?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work