• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Natural Tendency to do Good. Being around different people can make a human behave or act in ways that they normally would not. This is true in many possible ways and experiences that people go through.

Free essay example:

Fuller

Chase Fuller

Susan Priest

Philosophy 210

March 9, 2012

                                    Natural Tendency To Do Good

        Being around different people can make a human behave or act in ways that they normally would not. This is true in many possible ways and experiences that people go through. Mencius said, “Persons may be brought to do evil, and that is because the same is done to their nature.” This shows that being in a circumstance of force can make the natural tendency to do good be flawed through whatever it is that is shadowing the mind to make clear judgment. “The tendency of human nature to do good is like that of water to flow downward.” I believe human nature is to do good based upon the right surroundings because things that go on in an exosphere can make one think that certain choices are acceptable in society. What shows how human nature is to do good is how a human has a want to help out another human when they are in a time of need or desperation. Such as to donate food to a homeless shelter, or to give someone who is down and out a cup of coffee or a dollar.

        Human nature is to do good based upon the right surroundings in the exosphere and is supported where Mencius said, “Now you may strike water and make it splash over your forehead, or you may even force it up the hills. But is this the nature of water?” This is what shows that natural tendency to do good is what humans were created to do. I have been in times in life where I made poor decisions based on the forceful circumstances that I chose to be around. There were people around that had addictive criminal thinking where it clouded my mind and was ultimately making me not choose the most logical choice to progress in life positively, rather negatively. These people that were indirectly giving influences toward my life, that fostered an environment that made it seem acceptable to break the law, and gave me an evil action. What I realized is that the choice in having the wrong set of people around me was affectively making me have a circumstance that was progressing into evil actions.

        Where Mencius said, “People tend by their nature toward goodness, and it is only the adverse circumstances of their nurture that erode goodness and engender evil.” This fully supports natural tendency is to do good. People must think in a manner that will allow them to be of the right path and do what is righteous. Human nature has a distinctive tendency towards goodness, but ethical rightness cannot be initiated down to the last element. This is why simply external governors always breakdown in enlightening society. True progress results from learning education in constructive atmospheres.

        Human nature is to do good based upon the right surroundings in the exosphere. Having bad circumstances tend to degrade the human will. However, this is not confirmation of natural evil because a pure thinking person would escape causing harm to other people. So without having a negative external exosphere the simplicity of natural tendency to do goodness will come easily than thinking about it. I have since after putting myself in a negative environment that caused my mind to think that doing evil was something that was tolerated in society, it has now given me options to progress in life. Being around more positive people makes the natural come forth in choices, decisions, and actions. With the rightness inside of someone it makes evil be present, but it does not let the evil pass through and have its way with the individuals mind and action.

        I think it is significant that Mencius credits that human beings have certain natural abilities for goodness. If we did not have these abilities, I do not think any quantity of education could enforce these onto us. In this regard, I do think that education is a kind of attentive attending goodness. Mencius establishes that all people have hearts by engaging to the example of a child about to fall into a well. Mencius says that as soon as people see the child about to fall "they will feel a sense of unease and compassion." It is critical to notice that Mencius is not speaking about any kind of action here but about the instant response. These feelings of distress and empathy are not due to pursuing approval or wanting to reduce frustration. This response justifies Mencius' claim that "People all have hearts that do not tolerate the suffering of others".

        I feel that this falls in with what I have been addressing because in both ways it is what you are taught and what is naturally inside of a humans’ mind. It helps to prove that human nature is to do good based upon the right surroundings in the exosphere. The human only wants a good way of life and not an evil way that only brings despair and anguish through wrong actions. A human’s natural and taught ways of goodness to live and learn through lessons, whether it is through teachings or of actions. I have lived through life having those negative attributes that made me realize it is not an aspect of life I would like to have of being an evil person while going through the journey. That is how I see that the unease and compassion come into play with the natural tendency to do good.

        “When left to follow its natural feelings human nature will do good.” Mencius said that which helps support this argument of human nature is to do good based upon the right surroundings in the exosphere. If not putting yourself into a position to make you strive forward in the direction of virtuous instead of the wicked. With a clear peace of mind it helps to enfold life as it should be and have that natural tendency to do good.

Where Mencius says, “If it becomes evil, it is not the fault of our original capability.” This shows that another man or woman influences a humans thoughts. This proves that the exosphere can have a projection of a negative force behind it creating a circumstance that is not of the capability that the human should have. Mencius noted through these examples of senses: Sense of mercy, sense of shame, sense of respect, sense of right and wrong. He said, “seek and you will find them, neglect and you will lose them.” I feel that this is another reason proving the argument that has been stated throughout this paper to prove that human nature is to do good based upon the right surroundings because things that go on in an exosphere.

A humans’ natural tendency is to do good based upon the right surroundings because of things that go on in an exosphere. This has been proved through the evidence that has been shown though experiences that I have gone through and not only me, but many other people as well. With having the righteous path you can have the fullest extent of your original capability and that is to have the natural human nature to do good based upon the right surroundings because of the things that go on in an exosphere which can make one choose choices that are acceptable in society.

        Novak, Philip. The World's Wisdom. 1st ed. New York: HarperCollins, 1995. Print.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level Religious Studies & Philosophy Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Our freedom to make ethical choices is an illusion Discuss

    However Honderich rejects the claims of quantum physics, saying that they only apply at the subatomic level. The principle of causality is taken for granted when considering freedom as the opposite of causality is randomness. Random events are no freely chosen than behaviour determined by the laws of physics so rejects free will.

  2. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    (2)The Means-End condition states that the bad effect must not be the means by which the good consequence is achieved. (3)The Right Motive condition states that the motive must be the achieving of the good effect only, with the bad effect being only an unintentional side effect.

  1. All of our Choices are Predetermined

    argued in the course of this essay- is freely chosen, at least according to the viewpoint of free will presented by libertarianism.

  2. Examine the different ways in which good is used in meta-ethics Anything people ...

    Intuitionists or non-naturalists believe that you cannot analyse 'good' as a property, so therefore cannot believe in anything that people recognise as 'good'. They also believe that if it is contradicted a duty you ought to know, as in the Prima Facie Duty.

  1. An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

    The belief in the resurrection of the soul is the idea that the immortal soul leaves the body and goes to God, who either accepts or rejects the soul. In this essay I will examine different theories of an embodied afterlife and attempt to evaluate these with reference to other material.

  2. Can computers think?

    Since Turing's paper, there have been many publicised attempts at creating a machine that could pass the test, but most work on the principle of programming the machine with lists of responses in advance to questions. This is quite different from the idea of the machine creating the responses itself.

  1. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    is, and must be, a beginning and an end, and that there are also causal connections between phenomena. For the Chinese order is simply the patterned regularity we find in the world as we discover it and as we add to it.

  2. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    "I am condemned to be free," he states. "This means that no limits to my freedom can be found except freedom itself or, if you prefer, that we are not free to cease being free."1 Sartre tries to explain these difficulties, claiming that obstacles only present themselves through our own choices.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work