• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and Illustrate Aristotle(TM)s account of voluntary action and responsibility

Extracts from this document...


Assess Aristotle's claim that man has a function Aristotle believes that man has a function in life. In Book I, chapter 7, he states the following: "...if the function of man is an activity of the soul in accordance with, or implying, a rational principle; and if we hold that the function an individual and of a good individual of the same kind - e.g. of a harpist and of a good harpist and so on generally - is generically the same, the latter's distinctive excellence being attached to the name of the function (because the function of the harpist is to play the harp, but that of the good harpist is to play it well); and if we assume that the function of man is a kind of life, namely, an activity or series of actions of the soul, implying a rational principle; and if the function of a good man is to perform these well and rightly; and if every function is performed well when performed in accordance with its proper excellence: if this is all so, the conclusion is that the good for man is an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue, or if there are more kinds of virtue than one, in accordance with the best and most perfect kind." ...read more.


but this does not add anything factual to it. In comparison, the function of our eyes give us the ability to perceive the world but this adds nothing factually to simply saying that our eyes causes us to perceive. When we speak about function we give it a normative status to causation but this is subjective to every individual. This works for all teleological ideas and it reflects our own interests. As for teleological arguments, they can only be defended, mainly, by religion and also by anthropomorphic ideas of nature. For example, Thomas Aquinas believed that natural law was not made up by humans but rather an unchanging rule or pattern which is there for human beings to discover. Aquinas says that natural law is so complex that it had to have been designed by a higher power and he stated that the only plausible answer is God. However, using God as the answer to the existence and aim of human beings is a weak argument. Jean-Paul Sartre believes in the concept that "existence precedes essence" and that the idea that existence precedes essence means that a human being, as well as human reality, exists prior to any concepts of values or morals. ...read more.


For example, we can gamble, give to charity, make art and become intoxicated by drugs but that does not mean that any of these are our functions. On what grounds does Aristotle use that animals cannot use reason? Surely what we call "reason" is no more than instinctive response but on a conscious level than any action in the animal kingdom. Aristotle could simply argue that these are all examples of humans not using their reason well because a tyrant, terrorist or gambler is using their reason but not in conjunction with their virtues. A good example of this would be the terrorist Osama bin Laden who thought he was doing good for the world where in reality he was creating devastation. In conclusion, although Aristotle's belief of man's function in life gives us as human beings something to aim for (eudaimonia) it does not mean that man definitely has a function in life. Just because our organs work in a certain way does not mean our body must work towards something, and if our bodies are indeed working towards something then why must it be towards eudaimonia? As Sartre says, our function could be made up as we go through life. Why must we live life according to reason? Also, why must it just be reason we function upon? It is these questions that pose a problem to Aristotle's function argument and therefore make his claim flawed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato versus Aristotle on well being

    ring, one just and one unjust, and the unjust man carries out his unjust activities but is clever enough to disguise it and up holds his reputation for being a moral citizen so therefore gets away un punished however conversely the just man whom has been virtuous in all his

  2. Evaluate plato and aristotle on well being

    He starts by determining that all things have their own definite function, and that that function is "that which one can do only with it or best with it (Republic I 352e)." For example, the function of eyes is to see, and since a pruning knife is better suited to pruning than a butcher's knife, its function is to prune.

  1. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    In this sense, determinism and indeterminism both seem to lead to the same dead end, the conclusion since we do not have any true empirical control. The indeterminist then posits that the external world is not actually independent of human perception.

  2. Is active citizenship necessary to the achievement of eudaimonia?

    If man is to realise his nature as a political animal, then the state and its goal of eudaimonia are paramount concerns of his, the former as a means to the achievement of the latter. As the state must achieve self -sufficiency to create circumstances necessary to eudaimonia, then it

  1. Discuss the concept of Natural Law with reference to the ideas of Aristotle and ...

    Both the act and the intention must be good. This is unfair in certain circumstances but it does not take circumstances or situations into account. For example if a starving man steals from a rich greedy man in order to feed his family, this may not be seen as wrong as the intention was good and the circumstances enabled him to do so.

  2. Philosophy - analysis of Nietzsche, Sartre and Tolstoy

    Our Opinion 1. The existentialist point of view is more plausible because it dictates that humanity sets its own goals and values, deciding what it thinks is most important and what is right and wrong 2. An example would be a soldier in Nazi Germany, following orders from his superiors to kill civilians;

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work