• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline cosmological argument presented by Aquinas and discuss strengths and weaknesses.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline cosmological argument presented by Aquinas and discuss strengths and weaknesses. The most popular form of the cosmological argument was put forward by St. Thomas Aquinas, a catholic philosopher in his book 'Summa Theological'. He developed five arguments for the existence of god using the cosmological argument. This argument is also known as the first cause argument. The first 'way' was known as the Unmoved Mover. Aquinas observed that everything in the world is in motion, but for these objects to be in motion something must have first started it. However this chain can not be infinitive and must have started with something. Aquinas believed that God was the unmoved mover and that he put the universe in motion. ...read more.

Middle

The arguments contradict themselves, because Aquinas claims nothing can go back to infinity and must have had a first cause/motion, But then this leaves us with the question of where God came from. The third way is all about contingent and necessary beings. Aquinas observed that in nature people and objects come in and out of existence. However if things have to come into existence then nothing would ever of existed. There had to be something else here first as nature shows there are necessary beings, objects that are always present. But Aquinas argued that there must have been a very first cause and claimed this presence was God. ...read more.

Conclusion

With humans we are striving to be closest to perfection, Aquinas said that to be closest to perfection then we must use God as our maximum. This is argument is just another version of St.Anselms ontological argument. It does not really e4xpand on it and offers no new insight to why God is our maximum. The fifth way revolves around the concept of purpose. In the world we all must have a purpose, a means to our end. Aquinas used the example of an arrow and a target to demonstrate this point. For the arrow to reach its target it must be directed by the archer. Aquinas' argument claims that God is our archer and we are the arrows being directed to our target. This argument is quite strong, the world does show cause and effect but this argument still doesn't explain how God came into existence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    In Aquinas' second way, however, some philosophers have found a weakness. Aquinas conclusion that God must have been the first mover causes many to criticize his premise, as the idea of the existence of a first cause does not demand that this first cause be God.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    If this were the case, then there would be nothing now - but such an idea is absurd since we have the evidence of existent things which we can perceive.14 Yet, that could be because everything comes out of existence, then back into existence.

  1. St Thomas Aquinas and the Cosmological Argument

    * NECESSITY AND CONTINGENCY: - Aquinas observed that, in nature, there were things with contingent existences. Since it is possible for such things not to exist, there must be some time at which these things did not in fact exist.

  2. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of - The Thomist Cosmological Argument of the Existence ...

    since that relation implies a priority in time and in a beginning of existence?" So things that exist from eternity can't have a cause, otherwise they wont have existed from eternity. Hume continued to say that even if the universe did begin, it does not necessarily mean that anything caused it to come into existence.

  1. Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God. Comment on the claim that ...

    Subsequently, Anselm made a quick rebuttal by stating that the analogies used by Guanilo bear no similarities to God and thus cannot withstand the argument. This is because the idea of an island is contingent and not necessary. This means that the island can always be improved or you can

  2. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

    Frederick Copelston, like William Lane Craig was a modern day philosopher and put this argument into modern times. He thought that everything in the Universe is contingent (dependant on something else). The Universe is simply the totality of contingent things and is therefore contingent.

  1. Do the Strengths of the Design Argument out way the Weaknesses

    created it. Therefore this takes apart one of the premises of the design argument, and consequently making the argument unstable. Hume also argues that if the Design Argument is valid, then what it does is to prove a designer; but not his nature, which is a key point.

  2. Explain Anselms ontological argument.

    This fool says that god ceases to exist in reality, merely as an idea. 4. It is greater to exist both in the understanding and in reality, than essentially just in the understanding. 5. The greatest possible being, for it to be the greatest must truly exist in both modes: reality and understanding.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work