• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline cosmological argument presented by Aquinas and discuss strengths and weaknesses.

Extracts from this document...


Outline cosmological argument presented by Aquinas and discuss strengths and weaknesses. The most popular form of the cosmological argument was put forward by St. Thomas Aquinas, a catholic philosopher in his book 'Summa Theological'. He developed five arguments for the existence of god using the cosmological argument. This argument is also known as the first cause argument. The first 'way' was known as the Unmoved Mover. Aquinas observed that everything in the world is in motion, but for these objects to be in motion something must have first started it. However this chain can not be infinitive and must have started with something. Aquinas believed that God was the unmoved mover and that he put the universe in motion. ...read more.


The arguments contradict themselves, because Aquinas claims nothing can go back to infinity and must have had a first cause/motion, But then this leaves us with the question of where God came from. The third way is all about contingent and necessary beings. Aquinas observed that in nature people and objects come in and out of existence. However if things have to come into existence then nothing would ever of existed. There had to be something else here first as nature shows there are necessary beings, objects that are always present. But Aquinas argued that there must have been a very first cause and claimed this presence was God. ...read more.


With humans we are striving to be closest to perfection, Aquinas said that to be closest to perfection then we must use God as our maximum. This is argument is just another version of St.Anselms ontological argument. It does not really e4xpand on it and offers no new insight to why God is our maximum. The fifth way revolves around the concept of purpose. In the world we all must have a purpose, a means to our end. Aquinas used the example of an arrow and a target to demonstrate this point. For the arrow to reach its target it must be directed by the archer. Aquinas' argument claims that God is our archer and we are the arrows being directed to our target. This argument is quite strong, the world does show cause and effect but this argument still doesn't explain how God came into existence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Therefore, all things cannot be contingent. Corollary to this is the conclusion that there must then be such a thing as a necessary existence.16 Aquinas furthers his premise by supposing that there is a hierarchy of being with necessary existence, each lower being dependent upon the higher to infinity.

  2. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    In Aquinas' second way, however, some philosophers have found a weakness. Aquinas conclusion that God must have been the first mover causes many to criticize his premise, as the idea of the existence of a first cause does not demand that this first cause be God.

  1. Explain Aquinas cosmological argument for the existence of God. Humes criticisms ...

    cause and effect, because our minds have developed a tendency of seeing causes and automatically associating effects with them - this is called inductive reasoning. Although I do not believe that Hume's criticisms completely discredit the argument I do agree that this is a constructive point as we cannot assume

  2. St Thomas Aquinas and the Cosmological Argument

    Without a cause, there is no effect. If causes went to infinity, there would be no intermediate cause and no present effects for us. There must be a first efficient cause, which is in itself uncaused, who everyone calls G-d.

  1. Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God. Comment on the claim that ...

    He did this by using an analogy of a triangle. Descartes asks: 'can you imagine a triangle without three sides?' The answer to which is NO - simply because the very definition of a TRI-angle is to have three sides and three angles.

  2. Comment on some weaknesses of the cosmological argument

    The argument has attracted a number of criticisms. Bertrand Russell's ridicule that 'Every man who exists has a mother, and it seems to me your argument is that therefore the human race must have a mother, but obviously the

  1. Do the Strengths of the Design Argument out way the Weaknesses

    created it. Therefore this takes apart one of the premises of the design argument, and consequently making the argument unstable. Hume also argues that if the Design Argument is valid, then what it does is to prove a designer; but not his nature, which is a key point.

  2. Explain Anselms ontological argument.

    god is the greatest being to the conclusion that he must exist. Gaunilo claimed that through Anselm?s reasoning we can potentially prove anything one wishes into existence by proposing it?s the greatest thing or maximally perfect in its calibre. He used the example of an Island, that if we were

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work